41 U.S.C. § 1126 — Policy regarding consideration of contractor past performance
submitted 15 years ago by Pub. L. 111-350 to r/title-41-PUBLIC-CONTRACTS · 220 words · no verdicts yet
A translation hasn’t been published for this section yet. The official text below is complete and authoritative.
The Administrator shall prescribe for executive agencies guidance regarding consideration of the past contract performance of offerors in awarding contracts. The guidance shall include—
standards for evaluating past performance with respect to cost (when appropriate), schedule, compliance with technical or functional specifications, and other relevant performance factors that facilitate consistent and fair evaluation by all executive agencies;
policies for the collection and maintenance of information on past contract performance that, to the maximum extent practicable, facilitate automated collection, maintenance, and dissemination of information and provide for ease of collection, maintenance, and dissemination of information by other methods, as necessary;
policies for ensuring that—
offerors are afforded an opportunity to submit relevant information on past contract performance, including performance under contracts entered into by the executive agency concerned, other departments and agencies of the Federal Government, agencies of State and local governments, and commercial customers; and
the information submitted by offerors is considered; and
the period for which information on past performance of offerors may be maintained and considered.
If there is no information on past contract performance of an offeror or the information on past contract performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past contract performance.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 111–350, § 3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3689.)
- 2011Enacted · Pub. L. 111-350 · 124 Stat. 3689
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 111-350 on 2011-01-04.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case