ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 1320a–2aReviews of child and family services programs, and of foster care and adoption assistance programs, for conformity with State plan requirements

submitted 91 years ago by Pub. L. 103-432 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 620 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Secretary must create regulations to review State child-and-family-services and foster-care and adoption-assistance programs for substantial conformity with State plans, implementing regulations, and approved plans. The regulations must set review timing, withholding rules, correction opportunities, and administrative and judicial appeals.

(a) General rule. Consulting with the State agencies that administer State programs under parts B and E of subchapter IV, the Secretary must issue regulations reviewing those programs for substantial conformity with: (1) State-plan requirements under those parts; (2) the Secretary’s implementing regulations; and (3) the relevant approved State plans. (b) Review system. The regulations must: (1) set a timetable, including (A) an initial review of every State program; (B) a timely review after a program is found not substantially conforming; and (C) less frequent reviews for programs found substantially conforming. They must allow the Secretary to return to more frequent reviews when information suggests a program may not conform. (2) They must identify the requirements reviewed, including section 671(a)(27), and the criteria for measuring conformity and deciding whether a substantial failure occurred. (3) They must state how to calculate Federal matching funds to withhold, and ensure that: (A) funds are not withheld unless the program substantially fails to conform; (B) funds are not withheld for a failure caused by the State’s reliance on and correct use of a formal written statement of Federal law or policy supplied by the Secretary; and (C) the amount withheld relates to the extent of the failure. (4) For a program found substantially nonconforming, they must require the Secretary: (A) to give the State a chance to adopt and carry out a Secretary-approved corrective-action plan designed to end the failure; (B) to provide feasible technical assistance for developing and carrying out that plan; (C) to suspend withholding while the plan is in effect; and (D) to cancel the withholding if successful completion of the plan ends the failure. (c) Appeals and court review. The regulations must: (1) require the Secretary, within 10 days after a final finding that a State program does not conform, to notify the State of (A) the basis and (B) any Federal matching amount to be withheld; (2) give the State 60 days after receiving that notice, or, if later, after failing to continue or complete a corrective-action plan, to appeal to the Departmental Appeals Board; and (3) give the State 60 days after receiving the Board’s decision to seek judicial review of an adverse decision by appealing to the United States district court for the district where the responsible agency’s principal or headquarters office is located.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) In general

The Secretary, in consultation with the State agencies administering the State programs under parts B and E of subchapter IV, shall promulgate regulations for the review of such programs to determine whether such programs are in substantial conformity with—

(1)

State plan requirements under such parts B and E,

(2)

implementing regulations promulgated by the Secretary, and

(3)

the relevant approved State plans.

(b) Elements of review system

The regulations referred to in subsection (a) shall—

(1)

specify the timetable for conformity reviews of State programs, including—

(A)

an initial review of each State program;

(B)

a timely review of a State program following a review in which such program was found not to be in substantial conformity; and

(C)

less frequent reviews of State programs which have been found to be in substantial conformity, but such regulations shall permit the Secretary to reinstate more frequent reviews based on information which indicates that a State program may not be in conformity;

(2)

specify the requirements subject to review (which shall include determining whether the State program is in conformity with the requirement of section 671(a)(27) of this title), and the criteria to be used to measure conformity with such requirements and to determine whether there is a substantial failure to so conform;

(3)

specify the method to be used to determine the amount of any Federal matching funds to be withheld (subject to paragraph (4)) due to the State program’s failure to so conform, which ensures that—

(A)

such funds will not be withheld with respect to a program, unless it is determined that the program fails substantially to so conform;

(B)

such funds will not be withheld for a failure to so conform resulting from the State’s reliance upon and correct use of formal written statements of Federal law or policy provided to the State by the Secretary; and

(C)

the amount of such funds withheld is related to the extent of the failure to so conform; and

(4)

require the Secretary, with respect to any State program found to have failed substantially to so conform—

(A)

to afford the State an opportunity to adopt and implement a corrective action plan, approved by the Secretary, designed to end the failure to so conform;

(B)

to make technical assistance available to the State to the extent feasible to enable the State to develop and implement such a corrective action plan;

(C)

to suspend the withholding of any Federal matching funds under this section while such a corrective action plan is in effect; and

(D)

to rescind any such withholding if the failure to so conform is ended by successful completion of such a corrective action plan.

(c) Provisions for administrative and judicial review

The regulations referred to in subsection (a) shall—

(1)

require the Secretary, not later than 10 days after a final determination that a program of the State is not in conformity, to notify the State of—

(A)

the basis for the determination; and

(B)

the amount of the Federal matching funds (if any) to be withheld from the State;

(2)

afford the State an opportunity to appeal the determination to the Departmental Appeals Board within 60 days after receipt of the notice described in paragraph (1) (or, if later, after failure to continue or to complete a corrective action plan); and

(3)

afford the State an opportunity to obtain judicial review of an adverse decision of the Board, within 60 days after the State receives notice of the decision of the Board, by appeal to the district court of the United States for the judicial district in which the principal or headquarters office of the agency responsible for administering the program is located.

Source credit: (Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XI, § 1123A, formerly § 1123, as added Pub. L. 103–432, title II, § 203(a), Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4454; renumbered § 1123A, Pub. L. 104–193, title V, § 504, Aug. 22, 1996, 110 Stat. 2278; amended Pub. L. 109–432, div. B, title IV, § 405(c)(1)(B)(ii), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 2999.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1935Enacted · Pub. L. 103-432 · 108 Stat. 4454
  • 1996Amended · Pub. L. 104-193 · 110 Stat. 2278
  • 2006Amended · Pub. L. 109-432 · 120 Stat. 2999

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 103-432 on 1935-08-14.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case