ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 16462 — Service allocation

submitted 21 years ago by Pub. L. 109-58 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 216 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section covers a utility's associate company that supplies goods or services. If asked, the Commission must review and approve how the associate company's costs are shared. The Commission must also exempt certain single-state companies and low-impact transactions from this review.

(a) Definition of public utility: In this section, "public utility" means what section 824(e) of title 16 says it means.

(b) FERC review: Sometimes an associate company is set up just to sell non-power goods or administrative or management services to a public utility in the same holding-company system. If the system or a state commission with jurisdiction over the utility asks, the Commission must, after this part's effective date, review and authorize how much of that associate company's costs get allocated to the utility.

(c) Effect on Federal and State law: This section does not affect the Commission's or a state commission's authority under other applicable law.

(d) Rules: Within 4 months after August 8, 2005, the Commission must issue rules, effective no earlier than this part's effective date, that exempt from this section: any company in a holding-company system whose public-utility operations happen mostly in a single state, and any other class of transactions the Commission finds is not relevant to a public utility's rates.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Definition of public utility

In this section, the term “public utility” has the meaning given the term in section 824(e) of title 16.

(b) FERC review

In the case of non-power goods or administrative or management services provided by an associate company organized specifically for the purpose of providing such goods or services to any public utility in the same holding company system, at the election of the system or a State commission having jurisdiction over the public utility, the Commission, after the effective date of this part, shall review and authorize the allocation of the costs for such goods or services to the extent relevant to that associate company.

(c) Effect on Federal and State law

Nothing in this section shall affect the authority of the Commission or a State commission under other applicable law.

(d) Rules

Not later than 4 months after August 8, 2005, the Commission shall issue rules (which rules shall be effective no earlier than the effective date of this part) to exempt from the requirements of this section any company in a holding company system whose public utility operations are confined substantially to a single State and any other class of transactions that the Commission finds is not relevant to the jurisdictional rates of a public utility.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 109–58, title XII, § 1275, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 977.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2005Enacted · Pub. L. 109-58 · 119 Stat. 977

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 109-58 on 2005-08-08.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case