ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 18301 — Findings

submitted 16 years ago by Pub. L. 111-267 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 829 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Congress found that human spaceflight has inspired the nation since the first Mercury flight in 1961. It said NASA should keep exploring space, keep the Space Station running, and build new rockets and crew vehicles instead of relying only on Russia. It also said the U.S. should encourage commercial space companies while still keeping its own government-run space transportation system.

Congress makes fifteen findings.

(1) Since the first Mercury flight on May 5, 1961, the U.S. human spaceflight program has made Americans proud and inspired the country.

(2) Setting clear human exploration goals, and sticking to them, is essential. That gives NASA's civilian space program a long-term focus and keeps it steady and strong.

(3) NASA is, and should stay, an agency with many missions. It should keep a balanced mix of science, aeronautics, and human spaceflight and exploration.

(4) In the 50 years since NASA was created, space activities have grown much more complex. Civilian, commercial, and national security uses of space now overlap more and more. This creates both opportunities and challenges for NASA and the country.

(5) Getting to space is extremely hard. That challenge pushed the U.S. to develop technology and industry that made the country more advanced. Space activity should be tied to real human needs: influence, relationships, security, economic growth, trade, and the human condition.

(6) The country's economic health depends on keeping its aerospace industry, skilled workers, and expertise busy with exciting, demanding work. That work should keep the U.S. a leader in space exploration.

(7) Astronauts are essential to make sure the International Space Station pays off and keeps growing safely. Russia's Soyuz vehicle has kept letting U.S. astronauts reach the ISS, for routine trips and as a backup for rescue. But the Space Shuttle is retiring, and the U.S. will then have no way of its own to launch and bring back crews. Without a U.S. system, none of the ISS partners will have a backup way for humans to reach and leave the station. The U.S. needs to build its own capability as soon as possible.

(8) U.S. commercial companies already have some launch capability, and more is coming. These companies could support astronaut crews. Any new way to get crews to the ISS must keep the mission and the astronauts safe. Commercial services could make space more available and cheaper to reach.

(9) Commercial transportation systems can offer real value. Still, it is in the national interest for the government to keep operating its own space transportation system for crew and cargo.

(10) Congress repeats a promise it made in the 2005 and 2008 NASA Authorization Acts: to help develop commercial launch and delivery systems for crew and cargo trips to the ISS. Congress says again that NASA should use U.S. commercial crew transfer and rescue services as much as possible.

(11) It's critical to find the right mix of NASA and other federal programs. That mix should let the government partner with, build on, and encourage private and international efforts, both near Earth and farther away.

(12) The 2005 and 2008 Authorization Acts named the U.S. part of the ISS a National Laboratory. That gives federal agencies, university researchers, other research groups, and others a chance to use microgravity for basic science and possible economic gain.

(13) For some replacement parts the ISS needs to keep running, the Space Shuttle may be the only vehicle, built or planned, that can carry them there soon. The government needs to find backup ways to deliver these parts, backed by an independent study of what will really be available.

(14) The U.S. must build, as fast as possible, new vehicles that can launch both astronauts and cargo to low-Earth orbit and beyond.

(15) The country needs space and export-control policies. These policies must protect national security while still letting the U.S. and its aerospace industry work with other countries on science and human spaceflight, and compete well in the world market.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Congress makes the following findings:

(1)

The United States human space flight program has, since the first Mercury flight on May 5, 1961, been a source of pride and inspiration for the Nation.

(2)

The establishment of and commitment to human exploration goals is essential for providing the necessary long term focus and programmatic consistency and robustness of the United States civilian space program.

(3)

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is and should remain a multi-mission agency with a balanced and robust set of core missions in science, aeronautics, and human space flight and exploration.

(4)

In the 50 years since the establishment of NASA, the arena of space has evolved substantially. As the uses and users of space continue to expand, the issues and operations in the regions closest to Earth have become increasingly complex, with a growing number of overlaps between civil, commercial and national security activities. These developments present opportunities and challenges to the space activities of NASA and the United States.

(5)

The extraordinary challenges of achieving access to space both motivated and accelerated the development of technologies and industrial capabilities that have had widespread applications which have contributed to the technological excellence of the United States. It is essential to tie space activity to human challenges ranging from enhancing the influence, relationships, security, economic development, and commerce of the United States to improving the overall human condition.

(6)

It is essential to the economic well-being of the United States that the aerospace industrial capacity, highly skilled workforce, and embedded expertise remain engaged in demanding, challenging, and exciting efforts that ensure United States leadership in space exploration and related activities.

(7)

Crewmembers provide the essential component to ensure the return on investment from and the growth and safe operation of the ISS. The Russian Soyuz vehicle has allowed continued human presence on the ISS for United States crewmembers with its ability to serve as both a routine and backup capability for crew delivery, rescue, and return. With the impending retirement of the Space Shuttle, the United States will find itself with no national crew delivery and return system. Without any other system, the United States and all the ISS partners will have no redundant system for human access to and from the ISS. It is therefore essential that a United States capability be developed as soon as possible.

(8)

Existing and emerging United States commercial launch capabilities and emerging launch capabilities offer the potential for providing crew support assets. New capabilities for human crew access to the ISS should be developed in a manner that ensures ISS mission assurance and safety. Commercial services offer the potential to broaden the availability and access to space at lower costs.

(9)

While commercial transportation systems have the promise to contribute valuable services, it is in the United States national interest to maintain a government operated space transportation system for crew and cargo delivery to space.

(10)

Congress restates its commitment, expressed in the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2005 1 (Public Law 109–155) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2008 1 (Public Law 110–422), to the development of commercially developed launch and delivery systems to the ISS for crew and cargo missions. Congress reaffirms that NASA shall make use of United States commercially provided ISS crew transfer and crew rescue services to the maximum extent practicable.

(11)

It is critical to identify an appropriate combination of NASA and related United States Government programs, while providing a framework that allows partnering, leveraging and stimulation of the existing and emerging commercial and international efforts in both near Earth space and the regions beyond.

(12)

The designation of the United States segment of the ISS as a National Laboratory, as provided by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2005 1 and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2008,1 provides an opportunity for multiple United States Government agencies, university-based researchers, research organizations, and others to utilize the unique environment of microgravity for fundamental scientific research and potential economic development.

(13)

For some potential replacement elements necessary for ISS sustainability, the Space Shuttle may represent the only vehicle, existing or planned, capable of carrying those elements to the ISS in the near term. Additional or alternative transportation capabilities must be identified as contingency delivery options, and accompanied by an independent analysis of projected availability of such capabilities.

(14)

The United States must develop, as rapidly as possible, replacement vehicles capable of providing both human and cargo launch capability to low-Earth orbit and to destinations beyond low-Earth orbit.

(15)

There is a need for national space and export control policies that protect the national security of the United States while also enabling the United States and its aerospace industry to undertake cooperative programs in science and human space flight in an effective and efficient manner and to compete effectively in the global market place.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 111–267, § 2, Oct. 11, 2010, 124 Stat. 2807.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2010Enacted · Pub. L. 111-267 · 124 Stat. 2807

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 111-267 on 2010-10-11.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case