42 U.S.C. § 18933 — Software security and authentication
submitted 4 years ago by Pub. L. 117-167 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 279 words · no verdicts yet
The NIST Director must rate the severity of open-source software vulnerabilities and publish voluntary guidance to fix them. The Director must also research AI-based cybersecurity defenses and digitally sign all software the Institute releases. The Director must help train agency inspectors general and develop software supply-chain security practices.
(a) Vulnerabilities in open source software. The Director* must assign severity ratings to known vulnerabilities in open source software, and produce voluntary guidance to help entities that maintain open source software repositories find and fix them.
(b) Artificial intelligence-enabled defenses. The Director must research and test ways to make AI-enabled cybersecurity more effective, including by generating optimized data sets to train AI defense systems, and by evaluating how different network designs strengthen network security.
(c) Authentication of Institute* software. The Director must make sure all software the Institute releases is digitally signed and kept up to date, so stakeholders can verify it's genuine and hasn't been tampered with when they install and run it.
(d) Assistance to Inspectors General. If funding is available, the Director must give technical help to improve training for individual federal agencies' Inspectors General and staff, who must perform the annual independent review of each agency's information security program required under section 3555 of title 44.
(e) Software supply chain security practices*.
(1) The Director, working with industry, academia, and other agencies as appropriate, must develop security outcomes and practices, including security controls, control enhancements, supplemental guidance, or other supporting information, to help software developers and operators identify, assess, and manage cybersecurity risks across a software product's full lifecycle.
(2) The Director must reach out to and coordinate with federal agencies, relevant industry stakeholders, and standards organizations, as appropriate, to encourage voluntary adoption of these software lifecycle security practices by federal agencies and industry.
The Director* shall assign severity metrics to identified vulnerabilities with open source software and produce voluntary guidance to assist the entities that maintain open source software repositories to discover and mitigate vulnerabilities.
The Director shall carry out research and testing to improve the effectiveness of artificial intelligence-enabled cybersecurity, including by generating optimized data sets to train artificial intelligence defense systems and evaluating the performance of varying network architectures at strengthening network security.
The Director shall ensure all software released by the Institute is digitally signed and maintained to enable stakeholders to verify its authenticity and integrity upon installation and execution.
Subject to available funding, the Director shall provide technical assistance to improve the education and training of individual Federal agency Inspectors General and staff who are responsible for the annual independent evaluation they are required to perform of the information security program and practices* of Federal agencies under section 3555 of title 44.
The Director shall, in coordination with industry, academia, and other Federal agencies, as appropriate, develop a set of security outcomes and practices, including security controls, control enhancements, supplemental guidance, or other supporting information to enable software developers and operators to identify, assess, and manage cybersecurity risks over the full lifecycle of software products.
The Director shall conduct outreach and coordination activities to share technical expertise with Federal agencies, relevant industry stakeholders, and standards development organizations, as appropriate, to encourage the voluntary adoption of the software lifecycle security practices by Federal agencies and industry stakeholders.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title II, § 10224, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1478.)
- 2022Enacted · Pub. L. 117-167 · 136 Stat. 1478
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 117-167 on 2022-08-09.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case