ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 19084 — Advanced computing

submitted 4 years ago by Pub. L. 117-167 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 783 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Director must track and plan for the Foundation's growing need for advanced computing power. This means gathering data, publishing reports, and updating a five-year roadmap. The Director must also pilot three secure computing centers at colleges to protect sensitive research data.

(a) Computing needs. To learn what computing resources Foundation-funded projects actually need, the Director must require award proposals that need advanced computing, as appropriate, to estimate their computational needs. The Director must encourage the use of, and provide access to, tools that make this easier, including tools identified in a 2016 National Academies report called "Future Directions for NSF Advanced Computing Infrastructure to Support U.S. Science and Engineering in 2017-2020."

(b) Reports. Every two years, the Director must write and publish a summary of how much advanced computing capability, and what kinds, the Foundation needs to fully meet its project needs identified under subsection (a).

(c) Roadmap. To guide decisions about investing in advanced computing, the Director must build, publish, and regularly update a five-year roadmap. This roadmap must: describe the advanced computing resources that would fully meet expected project needs, including through the Mid-Scale Research Infrastructure program and the Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction account; draw on input from the community, information in research proposals and allocation requests, insight from operators of Foundation-funded cyberinfrastructure, and Foundation-wide information gathering; take into account the computing needs of planned major facilities; reflect expected technology trends; inform users and potential partners about future facilities and services; address the needs of groups historically underrepresented in STEM and of regions where advanced computing is scarce but in high demand; consider how Foundation-supported advanced computing can be used by the Directorate for Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships; and update Congress on the funding level needed to fully meet the research community's computing needs.

(d) Securing American research from cyber theft. [Paragraph (1) was omitted from the law as printed.] Paragraph (2) sets up a computing enclave pilot program. (A) In general: Working with the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the Secretary of Energy, and other relevant federal agencies, the Director must set up a pilot program that makes awards to keep federally supported research data secure and to help regional colleges and their researchers comply with rules for safeguarding sensitive information. (B) Structure: The Director must pick three colleges — each with an established graduate program and a track record of handling secure information safely — to develop, install, maintain, and keep running secure computing enclaves. (C) Regionalization: In choosing these colleges, the Director must favor ones that can also serve other colleges in their region, and must spread the enclaves out geographically so they meet different regions' needs. (D) Program elements: The Director must work with the chosen colleges to develop an approved blueprint for meeting federal data protection rules; a detailed, confidential list of every software, firmware, and product component needed to build more secure computing enclaves; template policies and procedures for running a secure computing enclave in a research setting; a template system security plan; and a process for managing an action plan and milestones for the enclave. (E) Sustainability: When reviewing applications, the Director must consider whether the applicant has a realistic plan to keep the computing enclave running long-term, even after federal funding ends. (F) Duration: As long as funding is available, the pilot program must run for at least three years. (G) Report: Within six months after the pilot ends, the Director must report to Congress. That report must assess the pilot, including the security benefits the enclaves provided; recommend whether to expand the network of secure computing enclaves; and recommend whether other federal agencies should use secure computing enclaves as part of a wider effort to secure federal research. (H) Authorization of appropriations: Congress authorized $38,000,000 for fiscal years 2023 through 2025 to carry out this computing enclave pilot program.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Computing needs

To gather information about the computational needs of Foundation-funded projects, the Director shall require award proposals submitted to the Foundation, as appropriate, to include estimates of computational resource needs for projects that require use of advanced computing. The Director shall encourage and provide access to tools that facilitate the inclusion of these measures, including those identified in the 2016 National Academies report entitled “Future Directions for NSF Advanced Computing Infrastructure to Support U.S. Science and Engineering in 2017–2020”.

(b) Reports

The Director shall document and publish every two years a summary of the amount and types of advanced computing capabilities that are needed to fully meet the Foundation’s project needs as identified under subsection (a).

(c) Roadmap

To set priorities and guide strategic decisions regarding investments in advanced computing capabilities, the Director shall develop, publish, and regularly update a 5-year advanced computing roadmap that—

(1)

describes the advanced computing resources and capabilities that would fully meet anticipated project needs, including through investments in the Mid-Scale Research Infrastructure program and the Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction account;

(2)

draws on community input, information contained in research proposals, allocation requests, insights from Foundation-funded cyber-infrastructure operators, and Foundation-wide information gathering regarding community needs;

(3)

considers computational needs of planned major facilities;

(4)

reflects anticipated technology trends;

(5)

informs users and potential partners about future facilities and services;

(6)

addresses the needs of groups historically underrepresented in STEM and geographic regions with low availability and high demand for advanced computing resources;

(7)

considers how Foundation-supported advanced computing capabilities can be leveraged for activities through the Directorate for Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships; and

(8)

provides an update to Congress about the level of funding necessary to fully meet computational resource needs for the research community.

(d) Securing American research from cyber theft
(1) Omitted

(2) Computing enclave pilot program
(A) In general

The Director, in consultation with the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the Secretary of Energy, and the heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies, shall establish a pilot program to make awards to ensure the security of federally supported research data and to assist regional institutions of higher education and their researchers in compliance with regulations regarding the safeguarding of sensitive information and other relevant regulations and Federal guidelines.

(B) Structure

In carrying out the pilot program established pursuant to subparagraph (A), the Director shall select, for the development, installation, maintenance, or sustainment of secure computing enclaves, three institutions of higher education that have an established graduate student program and a demonstrated history of working with secure information, consistent with appropriate security protocols.

(C) Regionalization
(i) In general

In selecting universities pursuant to subparagraph (B), the Director shall give preference to institutions of higher education with the capability of serving other regional universities.

(ii) Geographic dispersal

The enclaves should be geographically dispersed to better meet the needs of regional interests.

(D) Program elements

The Director shall work with institutions of higher education selected pursuant to subparagraph (B) to—

(i)

develop an approved design blueprint for compliance with Federal data protection protocols;

(ii)

develop a comprehensive and confidential list, or a bill of materials, of each binary component of the software, firmware, or product that is required to deploy additional secure computing enclaves;

(iii)

develop templates for all policies and procedures required to operate the secure computing enclave in a research setting;

(iv)

develop a system security plan template; and

(v)

develop a process for managing a plan of action and milestones for the secure computing enclave.

(E) Sustainability

In reviewing applications for awards, the Director shall review and consider plans and prospects of the applicant institution of higher education to ensure long-term sustainability of the computing enclave, beyond the availability of Federal funds.

(F) Duration

Subject to other availability of appropriations, the pilot program established pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall operate for not less than 3 years.

(G) Report
(i) In general

The Director shall report to Congress not later than 6 months after the completion of the pilot program under subparagraph (A).

(ii) Contents

The report required under clause (i) shall include—

(I)

an assessment of the pilot program under subparagraph (A), including an assessment of the security benefits provided by such secure computing enclaves;

(II)

recommendations related to the value of expanding the network of secure computing enclaves; and

(III)

recommendations on the efficacy of the use of secure computing enclaves by other Federal agencies in a broader effort to expand security of Federal research.

(H) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Director, $38,000,000 for fiscal years 2023 through 2025, to carry out the activities outlined in this paragraph.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title III, § 10374, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1571.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2022Enacted · Pub. L. 117-167 · 136 Stat. 1571

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 117-167 on 2022-08-09.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case