42 U.S.C. § 2000e–16c — Coverage of previously exempt State employees
submitted 35 years ago by Pub. L. 102-166 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 450 words · no verdicts yet
A translation hasn’t been published for this section yet. The official text below is complete and authoritative.
The rights, protections, and remedies provided pursuant to section 2000e–16b of this title shall apply with respect to employment of any individual chosen or appointed, by a person* elected to public office in any State* or political subdivision of any State by the qualified voters thereof—
to be a member of the elected official’s personal staff;
to serve the elected official on the policymaking level; or
to serve the elected official as an immediate advisor with respect to the exercise of the constitutional or legal powers of the office.
Any individual referred to in subsection (a) may file a complaint alleging a violation, not later than 180 days after the occurrence of the alleged violation, with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which, in accordance with the principles and procedures set forth in sections 554 through 557 of title 5, shall determine whether a violation has occurred and shall set forth its determination in a final order. If the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission determines that a violation has occurred, the final order shall also provide for appropriate relief.
Section 2000e–5(d) of this title shall apply with respect to any proceeding under this section.
For purposes of the application described in subparagraph (A), the term “any charge filed by a member of the Commission alleging an unlawful employment practice” means a complaint filed under this section.
Any party aggrieved by a final order under subsection (b) may obtain a review of such order under chapter 158 of title 28. For the purpose of this review, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission shall be an “agency” as that term is used in chapter 158 of title 28.
To the extent necessary to decision and when presented, the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law and interpret constitutional and statutory provisions. The court shall set aside a final order under subsection (b) if it is determined that the order was—
arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not consistent with law;
not made consistent with required procedures; or
unsupported by substantial evidence.
In making the foregoing determinations, the court shall review the whole record or those parts of it cited by a party, and due account shall be taken of the rule of prejudicial error.
If the individual referred to in subsection (a) is the prevailing party in a proceeding under this subsection,1 attorney’s fees may be allowed by the court in accordance with the standards prescribed under section 2000e–5(k) of this title.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 102–166, title III, § 304, formerly § 321, Nov. 21, 1991, 105 Stat. 1097; renumbered § 304 and amended Pub. L. 104–1, title V, § 504(a)(3), (4), Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 41.)
- 1991Enacted · Pub. L. 102-166 · 105 Stat. 1097
- 1995Amended · Pub. L. 104-1 · 109 Stat. 41
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 102-166 on 1991-11-21.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case