ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 2258Joint Committee on Atomic Energy abolished

submitted 80 years ago by Pub. L. 95-110 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 178 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A translation hasn’t been published for this section yet. The official text below is complete and authoritative.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Abolition

The Joint Committee on Atomic Energy is abolished.

(b) References in rules, etc., on and after September 20, 1977

Any reference in any rule, resolution, or order of the Senate or the House of Representatives or in any law, regulation, or Executive order to the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy shall, on and after September 20, 1977, be considered as referring to the committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives which, under the rules of the Senate and the House, have jurisdiction over the subject matter of such reference.

(c) Transfer of records, data, etc.; copies

All records, data, charts, and files of the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy are transferred to the committees of the Senate and House of Representatives which, under the rules of the Senate and the House, have jurisdiction over the subject matters to which such records, data, charts, and files relate. In the event that any record, data, chart, or file shall be within the jurisdiction of more than one committee, duplicate copies shall be provided upon request.

Source credit: (Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, § 301, as added Pub. L. 95–110, § 1, Sept. 20, 1977, 91 Stat. 884; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, § 902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1946Enacted · Pub. L. 95-110 · 91 Stat. 884
  • 1992Amended · Pub. L. 102-486 · 106 Stat. 2944

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 95-110 on 1946-08-01.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case