42 U.S.C. § 285e–4 — Awards for leadership and excellence in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias
submitted 82 years ago by Pub. L. 99-660 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 193 words · no verdicts yet
The Institute's Director must give awards to senior researchers with major Alzheimer's achievements. Recipients use the funds for research, and may train promising junior researchers. Awards last one year, and can be renewed for up to six more years.
The Director* of the Institute shall make awards to senior researchers who have made distinguished achievements in biomedical research in areas relating to Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Awards under this section shall be used by the recipients to support research in areas relating to such disease and dementias, and may be used by the recipients to train junior researchers who demonstrate exceptional promise to conduct research in such areas.
The Director of the Institute may make awards under this section to researchers at centers supported under section 285e–2 of this title and to researchers at other public and nonprofit private entities.
The Director of the Institute shall make awards under this section only to researchers who have been recommended for such awards by the National Advisory Council on Aging.
The Director of the Institute shall establish procedures for the selection of the recipients of awards under this section.
Awards under this section shall be made for a one-year period, and may be renewed for not more than six additional consecutive one-year periods.
Source credit: (July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, § 445B, formerly Pub. L. 99–660, title IX, § 931, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3807; renumbered § 445B of act July 1, 1944, and amended Pub. L. 100–607, title I, § 142(a), (d)(1), Nov. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 3057.)
- 1944Enacted · Pub. L. 99-660 · 100 Stat. 3807
- 1944Amended · Pub. L. 100-607 · 102 Stat. 3057
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 99-660 on 1944-07-01.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case