ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 290aa–3Peer review

submitted 82 years ago by Pub. L. 98-24 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 318 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Secretary must have experts review large grants, contracts, and agreements before awarding them. Reviewers for mental illness grants must mostly be licensed treatment professionals. The Secretary can make limited public exceptions to these rules.

(a) Before awarding a grant, cooperative agreement, or contract that costs more than the "simple acquisition threshold" set in section 134 of title 41, the Secretary must have qualified experts review it. This is called peer review, and the Secretary sets it up after talking with the Assistant Secretary. (b) People on a peer review group must be highly qualified through their training or experience. No more than one-fourth of any peer review group can be United States government officers or employees. If a peer review group is reviewing a grant, agreement, or contract about treating mental illness, at least half its members must be licensed, experienced professionals in preventing, diagnosing, treating, or helping people recover from mental illness or co-occurring mental illness and substance use disorders. Those members must hold a medical degree, a doctoral degree in psychology, or an advanced nursing or social work degree from an accredited program. As much as possible, the Secretary and Assistant Secretary must make sure these groups include people from both urban and rural areas. (c) If a grant or cooperative agreement's direct cost is more than the simple acquisition threshold, the Secretary can only award it if: (1) it passed the peer review required by subsection (a); and (2) the right advisory council recommends it. (d) The Secretary may create limited exceptions to the rules on federal employee participation and advisory council approval. The Secretary must make public the circumstances that allow such an exception.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) In general

The Secretary, after consultation with the Assistant Secretary, shall require appropriate peer review of grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts to be administered through the agency which exceed the simple acquisition threshold as defined in section 134 of title 41.

(b) Members

The members of any peer review group established under subsection (a) shall be individuals who by virtue of their training or experience are eminently qualified to perform the review functions of the group. Not more than one-fourth of the members of any such peer review group shall be officers or employees of the United States. In the case of any such peer review group that is reviewing a grant, cooperative agreement, or contract related to mental illness treatment, not less than half of the members of such peer review group shall be licensed and experienced professionals in the prevention, diagnosis, or treatment of, or recovery from, mental illness or co-occurring mental illness and substance use disorders and have a medical degree, a doctoral degree in psychology, or an advanced degree in nursing or social work from an accredited program, and the Secretary, in consultation with the Assistant Secretary, shall, to the extent possible, ensure such peer review groups include broad geographic representation, including both urban and rural representatives.

(c) Advisory council review

If the direct cost of a grant or cooperative agreement (described in subsection (a)) exceeds the simple acquisition threshold as defined by section 134 of title 41, the Secretary may make such a grant or cooperative agreement only if such grant or cooperative agreement is recommended—

(1)

after peer review required under subsection (a); and

(2)

by the appropriate advisory council.

(d) Conditions

The Secretary may establish limited exceptions to the limitations contained in this section regarding participation of Federal employees and advisory council approval. The circumstances under which the Secretary may make such an exception shall be made public.

Source credit: (July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, § 504, formerly § 506, as added Pub. L. 98–24, § 2(b)(7), Apr. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 178; amended Pub. L. 99–158, § 3(c), Nov. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 879; renumbered § 507 and amended Pub. L. 99–570, title IV, §§ 4004(a), 4007, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–109, 3207–115; renumbered § 504 and amended Pub. L. 102–321, title I, § 104, July 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 333; Pub. L. 102–352, § 2(a)(7), Aug. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 938; Pub. L. 105–392, title IV, § 412, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3590; Pub. L. 106–310, div. B, title XXXIV, § 3401(b), Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1218; Pub. L. 114–255, div. B, title VI, §§ 6001(c)(2), 6009, Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1203, 1215.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1944Enacted · Pub. L. 98-24 · 97 Stat. 178
  • 1985Amended · Pub. L. 99-158 · 99 Stat. 879
  • 1986Amended · Pub. L. 99-570 · 100 Stat. 3207
  • 1992Amended · Pub. L. 102-321 · 106 Stat. 333
  • 1992Amended · Pub. L. 102-352 · 106 Stat. 938
  • 1998Amended · Pub. L. 105-392 · 112 Stat. 3590
  • 2000Amended · Pub. L. 106-310 · 114 Stat. 1218
  • 2016Amended · Pub. L. 114-255 · 130 Stat. 1203, 1215

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 98-24 on 1944-07-01.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case