ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 299c–1Peer review with respect to grants and contracts

submitted 82 years ago by Pub. L. 106-129 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 511 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law requires expert review before AHRQ funds research. Peer review groups must recommend approval before the Director can award any grant or contract. The Director also sets rules for how peer review works.

(a) Requirement of review Every application for a grant, cooperative agreement, or contract under this subchapter must go through technical and scientific peer review. Each peer review group must report its findings and recommendations to the Director, in whatever form and manner the Director requires. (b) Approval as precondition of awards The Director cannot approve an application unless a peer review group set up under subsection (c) has recommended it for approval. (c) Establishment of peer review groups The Director must create as many technical and scientific peer review groups as needed. These groups don't have to follow the usual federal civil-service hiring rules, or the pay-classification rules under the General Schedule. Members must be people whose training or experience makes them highly qualified for the work. No more than 25 percent of any group's members can be federal officers or employees, and those federal members can't get extra pay for this work beyond their regular compensation. These groups can keep operating until a law says otherwise. Every member must, at minimum: (A) agree in writing to keep information they see through the group's work confidential, except for records and information that are already public; and (B) agree in writing to step aside from reviewing any specific application where they have a personal conflict of interest, or even the appearance of one — such as working for the applicant, owning its stock, or having any financial or other arrangement that could bias the review. (d) Authority for procedural adjustments in certain cases For applications where direct costs won't exceed $100,000, the Director can adjust the usual peer-review procedures — for example, to encourage new researchers to enter the field, to encourage clinical-practice-oriented or provider-based research, or for other purposes the Director finds appropriate. (e) Regulations The Director must issue formal regulations spelling out how peer review under this section will be conducted.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Requirement of review
(1) In general

Appropriate technical and scientific peer review shall be conducted with respect to each application for a grant, cooperative agreement, or contract under this subchapter.

(2) Reports to Director

Each peer review group to which an application is submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall report its finding and recommendations respecting the application to the Director in such form and in such manner as the Director shall require.

(b) Approval as precondition of awards

The Director may not approve an application described in subsection (a)(1) unless the application is recommended for approval by a peer review group established under subsection (c).

(c) Establishment of peer review groups
(1) In general

The Director shall establish such technical and scientific peer review groups as may be necessary to carry out this section. Such groups shall be established without regard to the provisions of title 5 that govern appointments in the competitive service, and without regard to the provisions of chapter 51, and subchapter III of chapter 53, of such title that relate to classification and pay rates under the General Schedule.

(2) Membership

The members of any peer review group established under this section shall be appointed from among individuals who by virtue of their training or experience are eminently qualified to carry out the duties of such peer review group. Officers and employees of the United States may not constitute more than 25 percent of the membership of any such group. Such officers and employees may not receive compensation for service on such groups in addition to the compensation otherwise received for these duties carried out as such officers and employees.

(3) Duration

Notwithstanding section 1013(a) of title 5, peer review groups established under this section may continue in existence until otherwise provided by law.

(4) Qualifications

Members of any peer review group shall, at a minimum, meet the following requirements:

(A)

Such members shall agree in writing to treat information received, pursuant to their work for the group, as confidential information, except that this subparagraph shall not apply to public records and public information.

(B)

Such members shall agree in writing to recuse themselves from participation in the peer review of specific applications which present a potential personal conflict of interest or appearance of such conflict, including employment in a directly affected organization, stock ownership, or any financial or other arrangement that might introduce bias in the process of peer review.

(d) Authority for procedural adjustments in certain cases

In the case of applications for financial assistance whose direct costs will not exceed $100,000, the Director may make appropriate adjustments in the procedures otherwise established by the Director for the conduct of peer review under this section. Such adjustments may be made for the purpose of encouraging the entry of individuals into the field of research, for the purpose of encouraging clinical practice-oriented or provider-based research, and for such other purposes as the Director may determine to be appropriate.

(e) Regulations

The Director shall issue regulations for the conduct of peer review under this section.

Source credit: (July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IX, § 942, formerly § 922, as added Pub. L. 106–129, § 2(a), Dec. 6, 1999, 113 Stat. 1665; renumbered § 932, Pub. L. 109–41, § 2(a)(3), July 29, 2005, 119 Stat. 424; renumbered § 942, Pub. L. 111–148, title III, § 3013(a)(2), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 381; amended Pub. L. 117–286, § 4(a)(243), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4332.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1944Enacted · Pub. L. 106-129 · 113 Stat. 1665
  • 2005Amended · Pub. L. 109-41 · 119 Stat. 424
  • 2010Amended · Pub. L. 111-148 · 124 Stat. 381
  • 2022Amended · Pub. L. 117-286 · 136 Stat. 4332

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 106-129 on 1944-07-01.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case