ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 300aa–13Determination of eligibility and compensation

submitted 82 years ago by Pub. L. 99-660 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 527 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law tells special masters when to award vaccine injury compensation. Petitioners must prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence, backed by medical records. The special master or court also weighs all relevant medical evidence in the record.

(a) General rule A petitioner gets compensation if the special master or court finds, based on the whole record, that: (A) the petitioner proved — by a preponderance of the evidence, meaning it is more likely than not — everything the petition needs to show under section 300aa–11(c)(1); and (B) it is not more likely than not that the illness, disability, injury, condition, or death came from a cause unrelated to the vaccine. This finding cannot rest on the petitioner's own claims alone — it needs medical records or medical opinion to back it up. "Factors unrelated to the administration of the vaccine" does not include any idiopathic, unexplained, unknown, hypothetical, or undocumentable cause. It may include things like infection, toxins, trauma (including birth trauma and related lack of oxygen), or metabolic problems that have no known link to the vaccine involved — but only where the evidence in the record shows that, in this particular case, that other cause was actually the main reason for the petitioner's illness, disability, injury, condition, or death. (b) Matters to be considered Along with all other relevant medical and scientific evidence in the record, the special master or court must consider any diagnosis, conclusion, medical judgment, or autopsy or coroner's report in the record about the cause and course of the injury, and the results of any diagnostic or evaluative tests, including their summaries and conclusions. None of this is automatically binding on the special master or court — in weighing it, the special master or court must consider the entire record and the full course of the injury, disability, illness, or condition up to the date of judgment. The special master or court may also find that the first symptoms of an injury actually occurred within the Vaccine Injury Table's time window, even though that symptom was not recorded, or was recorded as happening outside that window — but only if the evidence shows, by a preponderance, that the symptoms really did begin within the Table's time window. (c) "Record" defined For this section, "record" means the record built by the special masters of the United States Court of Federal Claims in a proceeding on a petition filed under section 300aa–11.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) General rule
(1)

Compensation shall be awarded under the Program to a petitioner if the special master or court finds on the record as a whole—

(A)

that the petitioner has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence the matters required in the petition by section 300aa–11(c)(1) of this title, and

(B)

that there is not a preponderance of the evidence that the illness, disability, injury, condition, or death described in the petition is due to factors unrelated to the administration of the vaccine described in the petition.

The special master or court may not make such a finding based on the claims of a petitioner alone, unsubstantiated by medical records or by medical opinion.

(2)

For purposes of paragraph (1), the term “factors unrelated to the administration of the vaccine”—

(A)

does not include any idiopathic, unexplained, unknown, hypothetical, or undocumentable cause, factor, injury, illness, or condition, and

(B)

may, as documented by the petitioner’s evidence or other material in the record, include infection, toxins, trauma (including birth trauma and related anoxia), or metabolic disturbances which have no known relation to the vaccine involved, but which in the particular case are shown to have been the agent or agents principally responsible for causing the petitioner’s illness, disability, injury, condition, or death.

(b) Matters to be considered
(1)

In determining whether to award compensation to a petitioner under the Program, the special master or court shall consider, in addition to all other relevant medical and scientific evidence contained in the record—

(A)

any diagnosis, conclusion, medical judgment, or autopsy or coroner’s report which is contained in the record regarding the nature, causation, and aggravation of the petitioner’s illness, disability, injury, condition, or death, and

(B)

the results of any diagnostic or evaluative test which are contained in the record and the summaries and conclusions.

Any such diagnosis, conclusion, judgment, test result, report, or summary shall not be binding on the special master or court. In evaluating the weight to be afforded to any such diagnosis, conclusion, judgment, test result, report, or summary, the special master or court shall consider the entire record and the course of the injury, disability, illness, or condition until the date of the judgment of the special master or court.

(2)

The special master or court may find the first symptom or manifestation of onset or significant aggravation of an injury, disability, illness, condition, or death described in a petition occurred within the time period described in the Vaccine Injury Table even though the occurrence of such symptom or manifestation was not recorded or was incorrectly recorded as having occurred outside such period. Such a finding may be made only upon demonstration by a preponderance of the evidence that the onset or significant aggravation of the injury, disability, illness, condition, or death described in the petition did in fact occur within the time period described in the Vaccine Injury Table.

(c) “Record” defined

For purposes of this section, the term “record” means the record established by the special masters of the United States Court of Federal Claims in a proceeding on a petition filed under section 300aa–11 of this title.

Source credit: (July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXI, § 2113, as added Pub. L. 99–660, title III, § 311(a), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3763; amended Pub. L. 100–203, title IV, § 4307(4), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–224; Pub. L. 101–239, title VI, § 6601(j), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2290; Pub. L. 101–502, § 5(c), Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1287; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, § 902(b)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1944Enacted · Pub. L. 99-660 · 100 Stat. 3763
  • 1987Amended · Pub. L. 100-203 · 101 Stat. 1330
  • 1989Amended · Pub. L. 101-239 · 103 Stat. 2290
  • 1990Amended · Pub. L. 101-502 · 104 Stat. 1287
  • 1992Amended · Pub. L. 102-572 · 106 Stat. 4516

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 99-660 on 1944-07-01.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case