ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 300gg–44State flexibility in individual market reforms

submitted 82 years ago by Pub. L. 104-191 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 1,171 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A state can skip the federal individual-market coverage rule. It must run an approved "alternative mechanism" instead. That mechanism must offer eligible people a choice of coverage with no preexisting condition exclusions.

(a) Waiver of requirements where implementation of acceptable alternative mechanism (1) In general: The federal rule in section 300gg–41 does not apply to individual-market health coverage in a state, as long as the state is using an approved substitute plan (called an "acceptable alternative mechanism"). To qualify, the mechanism must: give every eligible person a choice of health coverage; not exclude coverage for preexisting conditions; include at least one coverage option that is as good as standard comprehensive coverage sold in that state, or comparable to a standard option under the state's group or individual insurance laws; and be one of three specific types: a model law described in (c)(1), a qualified high-risk pool described in (c)(2), or another mechanism described in (c)(3). (2) Permissible forms of mechanisms: The alternative can be a public or private system — like an insurance pool or program, mandatory group conversion policies, guaranteed issue of one or more individual plans, or open enrollment by one or more insurers — or any combination of these, as long as it's designed to give individuals in that state's individual market access to health benefits. (b) Application of acceptable alternative mechanisms (1) Presumption (A) In general: A state is presumed to have an acceptable alternative mechanism starting July 1, 1997, if by April 1, 1997 the state's chief executive officer tells the Secretary the state has enacted or intends to enact, by January 1, 1998 (or July 1, 1998 for states described in (B)(ii)), the law needed to implement a mechanism reasonably designed to be acceptable, and gives the Secretary the information needed to review it. (B) Delay permitted for certain States (i) Effect of delay: For a state described in clause (ii) that already gave notice under (A)(i), to keep the presumption going after July 1, 1998, its chief executive officer must, by April 1, 1998, notify the Secretary that the state has enacted the needed legislation for a mechanism reasonably designed to be acceptable as of July 1, 1998, and supply the review information. (ii) States described: This delay applies to a state whose legislature does not meet within the 12-month period beginning August 21, 1996. (C) Continued application: To keep the presumption, the state must give the Secretary the same review information every three years. (2) Notice: If the Secretary finds, after reviewing that information and consulting the state's chief executive officer and insurance commissioner, that the mechanism isn't acceptable or isn't being implemented, the Secretary must (A) notify the state of that preliminary finding and of what happens under paragraph (3) if the state doesn't fix it, and (B) give the state a reasonable chance to modify or replace the mechanism so it can qualify, or to actually implement it. (3) Final determination: If, after that notice and chance, the Secretary still finds the mechanism doesn't qualify or isn't being implemented, the Secretary must notify the state that it's no longer considered to have an acceptable alternative mechanism, and that the section 300gg–41 requirements now apply to that state's individual-market coverage, starting on a date the Secretary specifies. (4) Limitation on secretarial authority: The Secretary can only make a finding under (2) or (3) on the ground that the mechanism isn't acceptable or isn't being implemented — no other ground is allowed. (5) Future adoption of mechanisms: If a state submits its notice and information after January 1, 1997, the mechanism is treated as acceptable, effective 90 days after the Secretary's 90-day review period ends, unless the Secretary makes a rejecting finding under paragraph (3) within that same 90-day period. (c) Provision related to risk (1) Adoption of NAIC models: The "model act" referred to in (a)(1)(D)(i) means the NAIC's Small Employer and Individual Health Insurance Availability Model Act (the parts that apply to individual coverage) or the NAIC's Individual Health Insurance Portability Model Act, both adopted June 3, 1996. (2) Qualified high risk pool: For (a)(1)(D)(ii), a "qualified high risk pool" is a high-risk pool that (A) gives every eligible person coverage (or comparable coverage) with no preexisting-condition exclusion, and (B) sets premiums and covered benefits consistent with the NAIC Model Health Plan for Uninsurable Individuals Act as it stood on August 21, 1996. (3) Other mechanisms: For (a)(1)(D)(iii), a qualifying mechanism either (A) provides for risk adjustment, risk spreading among insurers or policies, or other financial subsidy for eligible people (including help to participating insurers), or (B) lets every eligible person choose from all individual health coverage otherwise available.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Waiver of requirements where implementation of acceptable alternative mechanism
(1) In general

The requirements of section 300gg–41 of this title shall not apply with respect to health insurance coverage offered in the individual market in the State so long as a State is found to be implementing, in accordance with this section and consistent with section 300gg–62(b) of this title, an alternative mechanism (in this section referred to as an “acceptable alternative mechanism”)—

(A)

under which all eligible individuals are provided a choice of health insurance coverage;

(B)

under which such coverage does not impose any preexisting condition exclusion with respect to such coverage;

(C)

under which such choice of coverage includes at least one policy form of coverage that is comparable to comprehensive health insurance coverage offered in the individual market in such State or that is comparable to a standard option of coverage available under the group or individual health insurance laws of such State; and

(D)

in a State which is implementing—

(i)

a model act described in subsection (c)(1),

(ii)

a qualified high risk pool described in subsection (c)(2), or

(iii)

a mechanism described in subsection (c)(3).

(2) Permissible forms of mechanisms

A private or public individual health insurance mechanism (such as a health insurance coverage pool or programs, mandatory group conversion policies, guaranteed issue of one or more plans of individual health insurance coverage, or open enrollment by one or more health insurance issuers), or combination of such mechanisms, that is designed to provide access to health benefits for individuals in the individual market in the State in accordance with this section may constitute an acceptable alternative mechanism.

(b) Application of acceptable alternative mechanisms
(1) Presumption
(A) In general

Subject to the succeeding provisions of this subsection, a State is presumed to be implementing an acceptable alternative mechanism in accordance with this section as of July 1, 1997, if, by not later than April 1, 1997, the chief executive officer of a State—

(i)

notifies the Secretary that the State has enacted or intends to enact (by not later than January 1, 1998, or July 1, 1998, in the case of a State described in subparagraph (B)(ii)) any necessary legislation to provide for the implementation of a mechanism reasonably designed to be an acceptable alternative mechanism as of January 1, 1998,1 (or, in the case of a State described in subparagraph (B)(ii), July 1, 1998); and

(ii)

provides the Secretary with such information as the Secretary may require to review the mechanism and its implementation (or proposed implementation) under this subsection.

(B) Delay permitted for certain States
(i) Effect of delay

In the case of a State described in clause (ii) that provides notice under subparagraph (A)(i), for the presumption to continue on and after July 1, 1998, the chief executive officer of the State by April 1, 1998—

(I)

must notify the Secretary that the State has enacted any necessary legislation to provide for the implementation of a mechanism reasonably designed to be an acceptable alternative mechanism as of July 1, 1998; and

(II)

must provide the Secretary with such information as the Secretary may require to review the mechanism and its implementation (or proposed implementation) under this subsection.

(ii) States described

A State described in this clause is a State that has a legislature that does not meet within the 12-month period beginning on August 21, 1996.

(C) Continued application

In order for a mechanism to continue to be presumed to be an acceptable alternative mechanism, the State shall provide the Secretary every 3 years with information described in subparagraph (A)(ii) or (B)(i)(II) (as the case may be).

(2) Notice

If the Secretary finds, after review of information provided under paragraph (1) and in consultation with the chief executive officer of the State and the insurance commissioner or chief insurance regulatory official of the State, that such a mechanism is not an acceptable alternative mechanism or is not (or no longer) being implemented, the Secretary—

(A)

shall notify the State of—

(i)

such preliminary determination, and

(ii)

the consequences under paragraph (3) of a failure to implement such a mechanism; and

(B)

shall permit the State a reasonable opportunity in which to modify the mechanism (or to adopt another mechanism) in a manner so that may be an acceptable alternative mechanism or to provide for implementation of such a mechanism.

(3) Final determination

If, after providing notice and opportunity under paragraph (2), the Secretary finds that the mechanism is not an acceptable alternative mechanism or the State is not implementing such a mechanism, the Secretary shall notify the State that the State is no longer considered to be implementing an acceptable alternative mechanism and that the requirements of section 300gg–41 of this title shall apply to health insurance coverage offered in the individual market in the State, effective as of a date specified in the notice.

(4) Limitation on secretarial authority

The Secretary shall not make a determination under paragraph (2) or (3) on any basis other than the basis that a mechanism is not an acceptable alternative mechanism or is not being implemented.

(5) Future adoption of mechanisms

If a State, after January 1, 1997, submits the notice and information described in paragraph (1), unless the Secretary makes a finding described in paragraph (3) within the 90-day period beginning on the date of submission of the notice and information, the mechanism shall be considered to be an acceptable alternative mechanism for purposes of this section, effective 90 days after the end of such period, subject to the second sentence of paragraph (1).

(c) Provision related to risk
(1) Adoption of NAIC models

The model act referred to in subsection (a)(1)(D)(i) is the Small Employer and Individual Health Insurance Availability Model Act (adopted by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners on June 3, 1996) insofar as it applies to individual health insurance coverage or the Individual Health Insurance Portability Model Act (also adopted by such Association on such date).

(2) Qualified high risk pool

For purposes of subsection (a)(1)(D)(ii), a “qualified high risk pool” described in this paragraph is a high risk pool that—

(A)

provides to all eligible individuals health insurance coverage (or comparable coverage) that does not impose any preexisting condition exclusion with respect to such coverage for all eligible individuals, and

(B)

provides for premium rates and covered benefits for such coverage consistent with standards included in the NAIC Model Health Plan for Uninsurable Individuals Act (as in effect as of August 21, 1996).

(3) Other mechanisms

For purposes of subsection (a)(1)(D)(iii), a mechanism described in this paragraph—

(A)

provides for risk adjustment, risk spreading, or a risk spreading mechanism (among issuers or policies of an issuer) or otherwise provides for some financial subsidization for eligible individuals, including through assistance to participating issuers; or

(B)

is a mechanism under which each eligible individual is provided a choice of all individual health insurance coverage otherwise available.

Source credit: (July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVII, § 2744, as added Pub. L. 104–191, title I, § 111(a), Aug. 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 1984; amended Pub. L. 104–204, title VI, § 605(b)(1), Sept. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 2942.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1944Enacted · Pub. L. 104-191 · 110 Stat. 1984
  • 1996Amended · Pub. L. 104-204 · 110 Stat. 2942

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 104-191 on 1944-07-01.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case