ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 300h–4Optional demonstration by States relating to oil or natural gas

submitted 82 years ago by Pub. L. 96-502 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 433 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

States may show, in an alternate way, that their oil and gas injection program still protects drinking water. This alternate showing can be used again if EPA later revises the underlying requirements. A state keeps enforcement power under this route until EPA rules the showing is outdated.

(a) Approving a state program using an alternate showing. When EPA decides whether to approve a state's UIC program covering (1) injection of brine or other fluids from oil or gas production or gas storage, or (2) injection for secondary or tertiary oil or gas recovery, the state doesn't have to make the showing normally required under section 300h–1(b)(1)(A). Instead, the state can demonstrate that this part of its program meets the requirements of section 300h(b)(1)(A)-(D) and is an effective program — including good recordkeeping and reporting — that prevents injection that would endanger drinking water. (b) If EPA later revises those underlying requirements. If the Administrator revises or amends a regulation covering the injection described in subsection (a), a state that already made the subsection (a) demonstration doesn't have to make the showing normally required under section 300h–1(b)(1)(B) either. It can instead demonstrate, for that specific change, that its program still meets section 300h(b)(1)(A)-(D) and is still an effective program to prevent injection that endangers drinking water. (c) Primary enforcement responsibility under this route. (1) Section 300h–1(b)(3) — the normal rule for losing enforcement responsibility — doesn't apply to the part of a state's program approved through the subsection (a) (and, if used, subsection (b)) demonstration. (2) If EPA approves that part of the program based on the demonstration, the state keeps primary enforcement responsibility for it until the Administrator rules that the demonstration is no longer valid. After that ruling, the Administrator can step in the same way as under section 300h–1(c). (3) Before issuing any such ruling, the Administrator must give the public a chance for a hearing.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Approval of State underground injection control program; alternative showing of effectiveness of program by State

For purposes of the Administrator’s approval or disapproval under section 300h–1 of this title of that portion of any State underground injection control program which relates to—

(1)

the underground injection of brine or other fluids which are brought to the surface in connection with oil or natural gas production or natural gas storage operations, or

(2)

any underground injection for the secondary or tertiary recovery of oil or natural gas,

in lieu of the showing required under subparagraph (A) of section 300h–1(b)(1) of this title the State may demonstrate that such portion of the State program meets the requirements of subparagraphs (A) through (D) of section 300h(b)(1) of this title and represents an effective program (including adequate recordkeeping and reporting) to prevent underground injection which endangers drinking water sources.

(b) Revision or amendment of requirements of regulation; showing of effectiveness of program by State

If the Administrator revises or amends any requirement of a regulation under section 300h of this title relating to any aspect of the underground injection referred to in subsection (a), in the case of that portion of a State underground injection control program for which the demonstration referred to in subsection (a) has been made, in lieu of the showing required under section 300h–1(b)(1)(B) of this title the State may demonstrate that, with respect to that aspect of such underground injection, the State program meets the requirements of subparagraphs (A) through (D) of section 300h(b)(1) of this title and represents an effective program (including adequate recordkeeping and reporting) to prevent underground injection which endangers drinking water sources.

(c) Primary enforcement responsibility of State; voiding by Administrator under duly promulgated rule
(1)

Section 300h–1(b)(3) of this title shall not apply to that portion of any State underground injection control program approved by the Administrator pursuant to a demonstration under subsection (a) of this section (and under subsection (b) of this section where applicable).

(2)

If pursuant to such a demonstration, the Administrator approves such portion of the State program, the State shall have primary enforcement responsibility with respect to that portion until such time as the Administrator determines, by rule, that such demonstration is no longer valid. Following such a determination, the Administrator may exercise the authority of subsection (c) of section 300h–1 of this title in the same manner as provided in such subsection with respect to a determination described in such subsection.

(3)

Before promulgating any rule under paragraph (2), the Administrator shall provide opportunity for public hearing respecting such rule.

Source credit: (July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XIV, § 1425, as added Pub. L. 96–502, § 2(a), Dec. 5, 1980, 94 Stat. 2737; amended Pub. L. 99–339, title II, § 201(a), June 19, 1986, 100 Stat. 653.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1944Enacted · Pub. L. 96-502 · 94 Stat. 2737
  • 1986Amended · Pub. L. 99-339 · 100 Stat. 653

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 96-502 on 1944-07-01.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case