ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 300j–3dWater supply cost savings

submitted 10 years ago by Pub. L. 114-322 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 239 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The EPA must build a clearinghouse sharing cost-saving info on alternative drinking water systems, like wells. Applicants for small water system funding must certify they considered well-based alternatives first. The GAO must report to Congress on how these alternatives are used and how much they save.

(a) Clearinghouse: The EPA, working with the Secretary of Agriculture, must (1) build a technology clearinghouse with information on how cost-effective innovative and alternative drinking water delivery systems are — including wells and well systems — and (2) share that information with the public, and with communities and nonprofits that are seeking federal funding for drinking water delivery systems serving 500 people or fewer. (b) Self-certification requirement: If a local government or nonprofit applies for federal grant or loan money — whether directly from the federal government or through a state — to build, replace, or fix up a drinking water delivery system serving 500 people or fewer, it must certify that it considered publicly owned individual wells, shared wells, or community wells as alternative water sources. (c) Report to Congress: No later than 3 years after December 16, 2016, the Comptroller General had to send Congress a report describing (1) how these innovative and alternative drinking water delivery systems are being used, (2) the range of cost savings communities get from using them, and (3) how communities are using the technical assistance programs the EPA and the Secretary of Agriculture run.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Drinking water technology clearinghouse

The Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture, shall—

(1)

develop a technology clearinghouse for information on the cost-effectiveness of innovative and alternative drinking water delivery systems, including wells and well systems; and

(2)

disseminate such information to the public and to communities and not-for-profit organizations seeking Federal funding for drinking water delivery systems serving 500 or fewer persons.

(b) Water system assessment

In any application for a grant or loan for the purpose of construction, replacement, or rehabilitation of a drinking water delivery system serving 500 or fewer persons, the funding for which would come from the Federal Government (either directly or through a State), a unit of local government or not-for-profit organization shall self-certify that the unit of local government or organization has considered, as an alternative drinking water supply, drinking water delivery systems sourced by publicly owned—

(1)

individual wells;

(2)

shared wells; and

(3)

community wells.

(c) Report to Congress

Not later than 3 years after December 16, 2016, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report that describes—

(1)

the use of innovative and alternative drinking water delivery systems described in this section;

(2)

the range of cost savings for communities using innovative and alternative drinking water delivery systems described in this section; and

(3)

the use of drinking water technical assistance programs operated by the Administrator and the Secretary of Agriculture.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 114–322, title II, § 2108, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1728.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2016Enacted · Pub. L. 114-322 · 130 Stat. 1728

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 114-322 on 2016-12-16.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case