ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 5909Relationship to antitrust laws

submitted 52 years ago by Pub. L. 93-577 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 174 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A translation hasn’t been published for this section yet. The official text below is complete and authoritative.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)

Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to convey to any individual, corporation, or other business organization immunity from civil or criminal liability, or to create defenses to actions, under the antitrust laws.

(b)

As used in this section, the term “antitrust law” means—

(1)

the Act entitled “An Act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies”, approved July 2, 1890 (15 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), as amended;

(2)

the Act entitled “An Act to supplement existing laws against unlawful restraints and monopolies, and for other purposes”, approved October 15, 1914 (15 U.S.C. 12 et seq.) as amended;

(3)

the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.), as amended;

(4)

sections 73 and 74 of the Act entitled “An Act to reduce taxation, to provide revenue for the Government, and for other purposes”, approved August 27, 1894 (15 U.S.C. 8 and 9), as amended; and

(5)

the Act of June 19, 1936, chapter 592 (15 U.S.C. 13, 13a, 13b, and 21a).

Source credit: (Pub. L. 93–577, § 10, Dec. 31, 1974, 88 Stat. 1891.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1974Enacted · Pub. L. 93-577 · 88 Stat. 1891

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 93-577 on 1974-12-31.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case