42 U.S.C. § 6346 — Sustainable manufacturing initiative
submitted 5 years ago by Pub. L. 94-163 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 228 words · no verdicts yet
A translation hasn’t been published for this section yet. The official text below is complete and authoritative.
As part of the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy of the Department of Energy, the Secretary*, on the request of a manufacturer, shall carry out onsite technical assessments to identify opportunities for—
maximizing the energy efficiency of industrial processes and cross-cutting systems;
preventing pollution and minimizing waste;
improving efficient use of water in manufacturing processes;
conserving natural resources; and
achieving such other goals as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
To implement any recommendations resulting from an onsite technical assessment carried out under subsection (a) and to accelerate the adoption of new and existing technologies and processes that improve energy efficiency, the Secretary shall coordinate with—
the Advanced Manufacturing Office of the Department of Energy;
the Building Technologies Office of the Department of Energy;
the Federal Energy Management Program of the Department of Energy; and
the private sector and other appropriate agencies, including the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
As part of the industrial efficiency programs of the Department of Energy, the Secretary shall carry out a joint industry-government partnership program to research, develop, and demonstrate new sustainable manufacturing and industrial technologies and processes that maximize the energy efficiency of industrial plants, reduce pollution, and conserve natural resources.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 94–163, title III, § 376, as added Pub. L. 117–58, div. D, title V, § 40522(a), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1067.)
- 2021Enacted · Pub. L. 94-163 · 135 Stat. 1067
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 94-163 on 2021-11-15.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case