ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 6603Sense of Congress on innovation acceleration research

submitted 19 years ago by Pub. L. 110-69 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 170 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A translation hasn’t been published for this section yet. The official text below is complete and authoritative.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Sense of Congress on support and promotion of innovation in the United States

It is the sense of Congress that each Federal research agency should strive to support and promote innovation in the United States through high-risk, high-reward basic research projects that—

(1)

meet fundamental technological or scientific challenges;

(2)

involve multidisciplinary work; and

(3)

involve a high degree of novelty.

(b) Sense of Congress on setting annual funding goals for basic research

It is the sense of Congress that each Executive agency that funds research in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics should set a goal of allocating an appropriate percentage of the annual basic research budget of such agency to funding high-risk, high-reward basic research projects described in subsection (a).

(c) Definitions

In this section:

(1) Basic research

The term “basic research” has the meaning given such term in the Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A–11.

(2) Executive agency

The term “Executive agency” has the meaning given such term in section 105 of title 5.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 110–69, title I, § 1008, Aug. 9, 2007, 121 Stat. 581; Pub. L. 114–329, title II, § 204(a)(2), Jan. 6, 2017, 130 Stat. 2998.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2007Enacted · Pub. L. 110-69 · 121 Stat. 581
  • 2017Amended · Pub. L. 114-329 · 130 Stat. 2998

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 110-69 on 2007-08-09.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case