ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

43 U.S.C. § 1521 — Central Arizona Project

submitted 58 years ago by Pub. L. 90-537 to r/title-43-PUBLIC-LANDS · 737 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Secretary must construct, operate, and maintain the Central Arizona Project for water supply, flood control, fish and wildlife, recreation, and other stated purposes. The section lists its principal works and limits its Colorado River diversions when water is insufficient.

(a) Construction and operation. To furnish irrigation and municipal water to water-deficient areas of Arizona and western New Mexico, divert or exchange water, control floods, conserve and develop fish and wildlife, improve recreation, and serve other purposes, the Secretary must construct, operate, and maintain the Central Arizona Project. Its principal works are: (1) main conduits and canals, including the Hayden-Rhodes Aqueduct and pumping plants, carrying water from Lake Havasu to Orme Dam or a suitable alternative, with feasible capacity up to 3,000 cubic feet per second. Capacity above 2,500 cubic feet per second may carry Colorado River water only when Lake Powell is full, when releases prevent it exceeding elevation 3,700 feet above mean sea level, or when releases are made under 43 U.S.C. § 1552(a)(3). Costs of capacity above 2,500 cubic feet per second must be repaid from Arizona funds under § 1543(f) or from sources other than the development fund; (2) Orme Dam and Reservoir and a power pumping plant, or a suitable alternative; (3) Buttes Dam and Reservoir, operated without prejudicing Gila River users’ rights in the 1935 Globe Equity No. 59 decree; (4) Hooker Dam and Reservoir or a suitable alternative, built to give effect to § 1524(f); (5) Charleston Dam and Reservoir; (6) Tucson aqueducts and pumping plants; (7) Fannin-McFarland Aqueduct; (8) related canals, regulating facilities, hydroelectric plants, and electric transmission facilities needed to operate the principal works; (9) related distribution and drainage works; and (10) appurtenant works. (b) In a year when the Secretary determines that insufficient mainstream Colorado River water is available to release enough for 7,500,000 acre-feet of annual consumptive use in Arizona, California, and Nevada, the Arizona v. California decree must be administered so Central Arizona Project diversions are limited enough to assure 4,400,000 acre-feet for California’s present perfected rights, certain existing contract users, and existing Federal reservations, and equivalent protection for users of the same character in Arizona and Nevada. Nevada users may not bear a greater share of shortages than they would without this subsection. This does not change priorities among senior users or amend the decree. (c) The (b) limit does not apply while the Secretary determines and proclaims that operating means augment the Colorado River system’s supply enough to make sufficient mainstream water available for the 7,500,000 acre-feet release.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Construction and operation; Hayden-Rhodes Aqueduct and pumping plants; Orme Dam and Reservoir; Buttes Dam and Reservoir; Hooker Dam and Reservoir; Charleston Dam and Reservoir; Tucson aqueducts and pumping plants; Fannin-McFarland Aqueduct; related and appurtenant works

For the purposes of furnishing irrigation water and municipal water supplies to the water-deficient areas of Arizona and western New Mexico through direct diversion or exchange of water, control of floods, conservation and development of fish and wildlife resources, enhancement of recreation opportunities, and for other purposes, the Secretary shall construct, operate, and maintain the Central Arizona Project, consisting of the following principal works: (1) a system of main conduits and canals, including a main canal and pumping plants (Hayden-Rhodes Aqueduct and pumping plants), for diverting and carrying water from Lake Havasu to Orme Dam or suitable alternative, which system may have a capacity of 3,000 cubic feet per second or whatever lesser capacity is found to be feasible: Provided, That any capacity in the Hayden-Rhodes Aqueduct in excess of 2,500 cubic feet per second shall be utilized for the conveyance of Colorado River water only when Lake Powell is full or releases of water are made from Lake Powell to prevent the reservoir from exceeding elevation 3,700 feet above mean sea level or when releases are made pursuant to the proviso in section 1552(a)(3) of this title: Provided further, That the costs of providing any capacity in excess of 2,500 cubic feet per second shall be repaid by those funds available to Arizona pursuant to the provision of section 1543(f) of this title, or by funds from sources other than the development fund; (2) Orme Dam and Reservoir and power pumping plant or suitable alternative; (3) Buttes Dam and Reservoir, which shall be so operated as not to prejudice the rights of any user in and to the waters of the Gila River as those rights are set forth in the decree entered by the United States District Court for the District of Arizona on June 29, 1935, in United States against Gila Valley Irrigation District and others (Globe Equity Numbered 59); (4) Hooker Dam and Reservoir or suitable alternative, which shall be constructed in such a manner as to give effect to the provisions of subsection (f) of section 1524 of this title; (5) Charleston Dam and Reservoir; (6) Tucson aqueducts and pumping plants; (7) Fannin-McFarland Aqueduct; (8) related canals, regulating facilities, hydroelectric powerplants, and electric transmission facilities required for the operation of said principal works; (9) related water distribution and drainage works; and (10) appurtenant works.

(b) Limitation on water diversions in years of insufficient main stream Colorado River water

Article II(B)(3) of the decree of the Supreme Court of the United States in Arizona against California (376 U.S. 340) shall be so administered that in any year in which, as determined by the Secretary, there is insufficient main stream Colorado River water available for release to satisfy annual consumptive use of seven million five hundred thousand acre-feet in Arizona, California, and Nevada, diversions from the main stream for the Central Arizona Project shall be so limited as to assure the availability of water in quantities sufficient to provide for the aggregate annual consumptive use by holders of present perfected rights, by other users in the State of California served under existing contracts with the United States by diversion works heretofore constructed, and by other existing Federal reservations in that State, of four million four hundred thousand acre-feet of mainstream water, and by users of the same character in Arizona and Nevada. Water users in the State of Nevada shall not be required to bear shortages in any proportion greater than would have been imposed in the absence of this subsection. This subsection shall not affect the relative priorities, among themselves, of water users in Arizona, Nevada, and California which are senior to diversions for the Central Arizona Project, or amend any provisions of said decree.

(c) Augmentation of water supply of Colorado River system

The limitation stated in subsection (b) of this section shall not apply so long as the Secretary shall determine and proclaim that means are available and in operation which augment the water supply of the Colorado River system in such quantity as to make sufficient mainstream water available for release to satisfy annual consumptive use of seven million five hundred thousand acre-feet in Arizona, California, and Nevada.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 90–537, title III, § 301, Sept. 30, 1968, 82 Stat. 887; Pub. L. 100–345, § 2(b), June 24, 1988, 102 Stat. 643; Pub. L. 102–575, title XIII, § 1302, Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4662.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1968Enacted · Pub. L. 90-537 · 82 Stat. 887
  • 1988Amended · Pub. L. 100-345 · 102 Stat. 643
  • 1992Amended · Pub. L. 102-575 · 106 Stat. 4662

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 90-537 on 1968-09-30.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case