ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

43 U.S.C. § 373fPartnerships, grants, and cooperative agreements with local joint powers authorities

submitted 12 years ago by Pub. L. 113-76 to r/title-43-PUBLIC-LANDS · 264 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Secretary of the Interior may partner with, fund, or sign cooperative agreements with local joint powers authorities to advance planning and feasibility studies for water storage projects Congress has authorized. Environmental review documents must be shared with the partner authority, and reviews must move quickly using the shortest process available. The Bureau may skip its own study if the project can be done faster as a non-federal project or doesn't meet federal cost-benefit standards, and federal money only goes toward projects with a real federal interest.

From now on, the Secretary may partner with, give a grant to, or sign a cooperative agreement with a local joint powers authority — set up under state law by irrigation districts, other local water districts, and local governments — to help advance planning and feasibility studies for a water storage project Congress has authorized. The Secretary must make sure that any documents from preparing those studies, and from the required environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act, are shared with the joint powers authority the Secretary is working with. The Secretary, acting through the Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation, must also make sure that any required environmental reviews are finished quickly, using the shortest process the law allows, including for feasibility studies and draft or final environmental impact statements. The Bureau does not have to finish its own feasibility study or environmental impact statement if the Commissioner decides, and the Secretary agrees, that the joint powers authority can move the project forward faster as a non-federal project, or if the project doesn't meet the usual federal cost-benefit standards. Finally, the Secretary cannot give financial help toward these studies or projects unless there is a real, demonstrable federal interest in them.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

The Secretary may hereafter partner, provide a grant to, or enter into a cooperative agreement with local joint powers authorities formed pursuant to State law by irrigation districts and other local water districts and local governments, to advance planning and feasibility studies authorized by Congress for water storage project: Provided, That the Secretary shall ensure that all documents associated with the preparation of planning and feasibility studies and applicable environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act [42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.] for a project covered by this section shall be made available to any joint powers authority with whom the Secretary enters into an agreement to advance such project: Provided further, That the Secretary, acting through the Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation, shall ensure that all applicable environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act, to the degree such reviews are required, are completed on an expeditious basis and that the shortest existing applicable process under the National Environmental Policy Act shall be utilized, including in the completion of feasibility studies, Draft Environmental Impact Statements (DEIS) and Final Environmental Impact Statements (FEIS): Provided further, That the Bureau of Reclamation need not complete the applicable feasibility study, DEIS or FEIS if the Commissioner determines, and the Secretary concurs, that the project can be expedited by a joint powers authority as a non-Federal project or if the project fails to meet applicable Federal cost-benefit requirements or standards: Provided further, That the Secretary shall not provide financial assistance towards these studies or projects, unless there is a demonstrable Federal interest.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 113–76, div. D, title II, § 208, Jan. 17, 2014, 128 Stat. 164.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2014Enacted · Pub. L. 113-76 · 128 Stat. 164

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 113-76 on 2014-01-17.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case