ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

43 U.S.C. § 390h–17Lakehaven, Washington, Water Reclamation and Reuse Project

submitted 24 years ago by Pub. L. 102-575 to r/title-43-PUBLIC-LANDS · 97 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Authorizes the Secretary to help the Lakehaven Utility District, Washington, build a project reclaiming wastewater and degraded groundwater, including land acquisition, capping the federal share at 25 percent.

(a) Authorization: The Secretary, working with the Lakehaven Utility District, Washington, may help design, plan, build, and acquire land for a project to reclaim and reuse wastewater, including degraded groundwater, inside and outside the district's service area. (b) Cost share: The federal share of the project's cost cannot exceed 25 percent of the total. (c) Limitation: The Secretary may not fund the project's operation and maintenance.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Authorization

The Secretary, in cooperation with the Lakehaven Utility District, Washington, is authorized to participate in the design, planning, and construction of, and land acquisition for, a project to reclaim and reuse wastewater, including degraded groundwaters, within and outside of the service area of the Lakehaven Utility District.

(b) Cost share

The Federal share of the cost of the project authorized by this section shall not exceed 25 percent of the total cost of the project.

(c) Limitation

The Secretary shall not provide funds for the operation and maintenance of the project authorized by this section.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 102–575, title XVI, § 1635, as added Pub. L. 107–344, § 1, Dec. 17, 2002, 116 Stat. 2893.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2002Enacted · Pub. L. 102-575 · 116 Stat. 2893

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 102-575 on 2002-12-17.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case