ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

43 U.S.C. § 390h–2Feasibility studies

submitted 34 years ago by Pub. L. 102-575 to r/title-43-PUBLIC-LANDS · 383 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Authorizes the Secretary to help fund feasibility studies for water reclamation and reuse projects recommended under section 390h–1, usually splitting costs 50/50, and lists what these studies must consider.

(a) General authority; federal and non-federal cost shares: The Secretary may work with federal, state, regional, and local authorities on studies to test whether water reclamation and reuse projects, recommended for study under section 390h–1, are workable. The federal share of these feasibility studies cannot exceed 50 percent of the total — except the Secretary can raise the federal share if the non-federal participant proves financial hardship and cannot afford at least 50 percent. The Secretary may count in-kind services from the non-federal participant as part of its cost share, if the Secretary decides those services will substantially help complete the study. (b) Federal share considered project costs; reimbursement: The federal share of feasibility studies — including those in sections 390h–4 and 390h–6 through 390h–8 — counts as project costs and gets reimbursed under federal reclamation law, if the studied project is actually built. (c) Matters to be considered: Besides what other federal laws require, feasibility studies by the Secretary or a non-federal project sponsor must consider, among other things: (1) near- and long-term water demand and supply in the study area; (2) all potential uses for reclaimed water; (3) at least two alternative methods or technologies for reclaiming, distributing, and reusing water for the project; (4) public health and environmental quality issues tied to using reclaimed water; (5) whether the reclamation and reuse measures being studied would (A) reduce, delay, or eliminate the need for new or bigger water supplies, (B) reduce or eliminate existing diversions from natural waterways or withdrawals from aquifers, or (C) reduce demand on existing federal water supply facilities; (6) the market or dedicated use for reclaimed water in the project's service area; and (7) whether the non-federal project sponsor can afford to pay its share of construction costs each year.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) General authority; Federal and non-Federal cost shares

The Secretary is authorized to participate with appropriate Federal, State, regional, and local authorities in studies to determine the feasibility of water reclamation and reuse projects recommended for such study pursuant to section 390h–1 of this title. The Federal share of the costs of such feasibility studies shall not exceed 50 per centum of the total, except that the Secretary may increase the Federal share of the costs of such feasibility study if the Secretary determines, based upon a demonstration of financial hardship on the part of the non-Federal participant, that the non-Federal participant is unable to contribute at least 50 per centum of the costs of such study. The Secretary may accept as part of the non-Federal cost share the contribution of such in-kind services by the non-Federal participant that the Secretary determines will contribute substantially toward the conduct and completion of the study.

(b) Federal share considered project costs; reimbursement

The Federal share of feasibility studies, including those described in sections 390h–4 and 390h–6 through 390h–8 of this title, shall be considered as project costs and shall be reimbursed in accordance with the Federal reclamation laws, if the project studied is implemented.

(c) Matters to be considered

In addition to the requirements of other Federal laws, feasibility studies conducted by the Secretary or the non-Federal project sponsor under sections 390h to 390h–39 of this title shall consider, among other things—

(1)

near- and long-term water demand and supplies in the study area;

(2)

all potential uses for reclaimed water;

(3)

at least two alternative measures or technologies available for water reclamation, distribution, and reuse for the project under consideration;

(4)

public health and environmental quality issues associated with use of reclaimed water;

(5)

whether development of the water reclamation and reuse measures under study would—

(A)

reduce, postpone, or eliminate development of new or expanded water supplies,

(B)

reduce or eliminate the use of existing diversions from natural watercourses or withdrawals from aquifers, or

(C)

reduce the demand on existing Federal water supply facilities;

(6)

the market or dedicated use for reclaimed water in the project’s service area; and

(7)

the financial capability of the non-Federal project sponsor to fund its proportionate share of the project’s construction costs on an annual basis.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 102–575, title XVI, § 1604, Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4665; Pub. L. 104–266, § 4, Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3295.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1992Enacted · Pub. L. 102-575 · 106 Stat. 4665
  • 1996Amended · Pub. L. 104-266 · 110 Stat. 3295

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 102-575 on 1992-10-30.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case