44 U.S.C. § 1109 — Printing documents in two or more editions; full number and allotment of full quota
submitted 58 years ago by Pub. L. 90-620 to r/title-44-PUBLIC-PRINTING-AND-DOCUMENTS · 113 words · no verdicts yet
An authorized number of copies may be printed in multiple editions if their total does not exceed the authorized number. The full number may still be printed, and Senators and Representatives may receive their full allotments, when a legitimate demand is known.
The head of an executive department, independent agency, or Government establishment may ask the Director of the Government Publishing Office to supply an authorized number of copies of a public document or report in two or more editions instead of one. The editions together may not exceed the otherwise authorized number. This section does not stop the Government from printing the full authorized number or giving Senators and Representatives their full allotments when a legitimate demand for the full number is known.
The number of copies of a public document or report authorized to be printed for an executive department, independent agency, or establishment of the Government may be supplied in two or more editions, instead of one, upon a requisition on the Director of the Government Publishing Office by the head of the department or independent office, but the aggregate of the editions may not exceed the number of copies otherwise authorized. This section does not preclude the printing of the full number of a document or report, or the allotment of the full quota to Senators and Representatives, as otherwise authorized, when a legitimate demand for the full complement is known to exist.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1262; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, § 1301(c)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)
- 1968Enacted · Pub. L. 90-620 · 82 Stat. 1262
- 2014Amended · Pub. L. 113-235 · 128 Stat. 2537
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 90-620 on 1968-10-22.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case