0
46 U.S.C. § 11107 — Unlawful engagements void
submitted 43 years ago by Pub. L. 98-89 to r/title-46-SHIPPING · 65 words · no verdicts yet
in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice
A translation hasn’t been published for this section yet. The official text below is complete and authoritative.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
An engagement of a seaman contrary to a law of the United States is void. A seaman so engaged may leave the service of the vessel* at any time and is entitled to recover the highest rate of wages at the port from which the seaman was engaged or the amount agreed to be given the seaman at the time of engagement, whichever is higher.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 580.)
history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
- 1983Enacted · Pub. L. 98-89 · 97 Stat. 580
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 98-89 on 1983-08-26.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case