46 U.S.C. § 30528 — Vicarious liability for medical malpractice with regard to crew
submitted 20 years ago by Pub. L. 109-304 to r/title-46-SHIPPING · 104 words · no verdicts yet
This section addresses vicarious liability for medical malpractice with regard to crew. It sets out the definitions, duties, limits, exceptions, or procedures stated in the explanation.
In a civil action by any person in which the owner* or operator of a vessel* or employer of a crewmember is claimed to have vicarious liability for medical malpractice with regard to a crewmember occurring at a shoreside facility, and to the extent the damages resulted from the conduct of any shoreside doctor, hospital, medical facility, or other health care provider, the owner, operator, or employer is entitled to rely on any statutory limitations of liability applicable to the doctor, hospital, medical facility, or other health care provider in the State* of the United States in which the shoreside medical care was provided.
In a civil action by any person in which the owner* or operator of a vessel* or employer of a crewmember is claimed to have vicarious liability for medical malpractice with regard to a crewmember occurring at a shoreside facility, and to the extent the damages resulted from the conduct of any shoreside doctor, hospital, medical facility, or other health care provider, the owner, operator, or employer is entitled to rely on any statutory limitations of liability applicable to the doctor, hospital, medical facility, or other health care provider in the State* of the United States in which the shoreside medical care was provided.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 109–304, § 6(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1515, § 30510; renumbered § 30528, Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXV, § 11503(a)(3), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4130.)
- 2006Enacted · Pub. L. 109-304 · 120 Stat. 1515
- 2022Amended · Pub. L. 117-263 · 136 Stat. 4130
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 109-304 on 2006-10-06.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case