ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

47 U.S.C. § 276Provision of payphone service

submitted 92 years ago by Pub. L. 104-104 to r/title-47-TELECOMMUNICATIONS · 565 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Bell phone companies can't unfairly subsidize or favor their own payphones. The FCC must set rules for fair payphone pay, ending old subsidies, within 9 months of February 8, 1996. State rules that conflict with these FCC rules don't apply, and the section defines "payphone service."

(a) Nondiscrimination safeguards: After the rules under subsection (b) take effect, a Bell operating company providing payphone service (1) cannot subsidize that service, directly or indirectly, from its telephone exchange service or exchange access operations, and (2) cannot prefer or discriminate in favor of its own payphone service. (b) Regulations: (1) Contents of regulations: Within 9 months after February 8, 1996, the Commission had to take all necessary actions to prescribe regulations that (A) establish a compensation plan so all payphone service providers are fairly compensated, and rates and charges are just and reasonable, for completed calls using their payphones — except emergency calls and telecommunications relay service calls for hearing-disabled individuals are not subject to this compensation; (B) discontinue the old intrastate and interstate carrier access charge payphone elements and payments, and all payphone subsidies from basic exchange and exchange access revenues, replacing them with the new compensation plan; (C) prescribe nonstructural safeguards for Bell operating company payphone service, at least as strong as those adopted in the Computer Inquiry-III proceeding; (D) let Bell operating company payphone providers negotiate with the location provider and select carriers for interLATA (long-distance) calls, the same right independent payphone providers already have, unless the Commission decides in its rulemaking that this is not in the public interest; and (E) let all payphone service providers negotiate with the location provider and select carriers for intraLATA calls. (2) Public interest telephones: In this rulemaking, the Commission had to decide whether "public interest payphones" — provided for public health, safety, and welfare, where there would otherwise be no payphone — should be maintained, and if so, make sure they are fairly and equitably supported. (3) Existing contracts: Nothing in this section affects existing contracts between location providers and payphone service providers or interLATA/intraLATA carriers that were in force as of February 8, 1996. (c) State preemption: To the extent state requirements conflict with the Commission's regulations, the Commission's regulations preempt the state requirements. (d) "Payphone service" defined: This means providing public or semi-public pay telephones, plus inmate telephone service and certain advanced communications services (described in section 153(1)(A), (B), (D), and (E)) in correctional institutions, and any related services.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Nondiscrimination safeguards

After the effective date of the rules prescribed pursuant to subsection (b), any Bell operating company that provides payphone service—

(1)

shall not subsidize its payphone service directly or indirectly from its telephone exchange service operations or its exchange access operations; and

(2)

shall not prefer or discriminate in favor of its payphone service.

(b) Regulations
(1) Contents of regulations

In order to promote competition among payphone service providers and promote the widespread deployment of payphone services to the benefit of the general public, within 9 months after February 8, 1996, the Commission shall take all actions necessary (including any reconsideration) to prescribe regulations that—

(A)

establish a compensation plan to ensure that all payphone service providers are fairly compensated, and all rates and charges are just and reasonable, for completed intrastate and interstate communications using their payphone or other calling device, except that emergency calls and telecommunications relay service calls for hearing disabled individuals shall not be subject to such compensation;

(B)

discontinue the intrastate and interstate carrier access charge payphone service elements and payments in effect on February 8, 1996, and all intrastate and interstate payphone subsidies from basic exchange and exchange access revenues, in favor of a compensation plan as specified in subparagraph (A);

(C)

prescribe a set of nonstructural safeguards for Bell operating company payphone service to implement the provisions of paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a), which safeguards shall, at a minimum, include the nonstructural safeguards equal to those adopted in the Computer Inquiry-III (CC Docket No. 90–623) proceeding;

(D)

provide for Bell operating company payphone service providers to have the same right that independent payphone providers have to negotiate with the location provider on the location provider’s selecting and contracting with, and, subject to the terms of any agreement with the location provider, to select and contract with, the carriers that carry interLATA calls from their payphones, unless the Commission determines in the rulemaking pursuant to this section that it is not in the public interest; and

(E)

provide for all payphone service providers to have the right to negotiate with the location provider on the location provider’s selecting and contracting with, and, subject to the terms of any agreement with the location provider, to select and contract with, the carriers that carry intraLATA calls from their payphones.

(2) Public interest telephones

In the rulemaking conducted pursuant to paragraph (1), the Commission shall determine whether public interest payphones, which are provided in the interest of public health, safety, and welfare, in locations where there would otherwise not be a payphone, should be maintained, and if so, ensure that such public interest payphones are supported fairly and equitably.

(3) Existing contracts

Nothing in this section shall affect any existing contracts between location providers and payphone service providers or interLATA or intraLATA carriers that are in force and effect as of February 8, 1996.

(c) State preemption

To the extent that any State requirements are inconsistent with the Commission’s regulations, the Commission’s regulations on such matters shall preempt such State requirements.

(d) “Payphone service” defined

As used in this section, the term “payphone service” means the provision of public or semi-public pay telephones, the provision of inmate telephone service and advanced communications services described in subparagraphs (A), (B), (D), and (E) of section 153(1) of this title in correctional institutions, and any ancillary services.

Source credit: (June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title II, § 276, as added Pub. L. 104–104, title I, § 151(a), Feb. 8, 1996, 10 Stat. 106; amended Pub. L. 117–338, § 2(a), Jan. 5, 2023, 136 Stat. 6156.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1934Enacted · Pub. L. 104-104 · 10 Stat. 106
  • 2023Amended · Pub. L. 117-338 · 136 Stat. 6156

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 104-104 on 1934-06-19.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case