ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

49 U.S.C. § 1153Judicial review

submitted 32 years ago by Pub. L. 103-272 to r/title-49-TRANSPORTATION · 555 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section explains how people, the Federal Aviation Administration Administrator, and the Coast Guard Commandant may seek judicial review of specified Board orders. It sets filing deadlines, court powers, record and notice duties, limits on objections, and standards for factual findings.

(a) General. — The appropriate court of appeals of the United States or the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit may review a final order of the National Transportation Safety Board under this chapter. A person disclosing a substantial interest in the order may apply for review by filing a petition by 60 days after the order of the Board is issued. (b) Persons Seeking Judicial Review of Aviation Matters. — (1) A person disclosing a substantial interest in an order related to an aviation matter issued by the Board under this chapter may apply for review of the order by filing a petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit or in the court of appeals of the United States for the circuit in which the person resides or has its principal place of business. The petition must be filed by 60 days after the order is issued. The court may allow the petition to be filed after the 60 days only if there was a reasonable ground for not filing within that 60-day period. (2) When a petition is filed under paragraph (1) of this subsection, the clerk of the court immediately must send a copy of the petition to the Board. The Board must file with the court a record of the proceeding in which the order was issued. (3) When the petition is sent to the Board, the court has exclusive jurisdiction to affirm, amend, modify, or set aside any part of the order and may order the Board to conduct further proceedings. After reasonable notice to the Board, the court may grant interim relief by staying the order or taking other appropriate action when cause for its action exists. Findings of fact by the Board, if supported by substantial evidence, are conclusive. (4) In reviewing an order under this subsection, the court may consider an objection to an order of the Board only if the objection was made in the proceeding conducted by the Board or if there was a reasonable ground for not making the objection in the proceeding. (5) A decision by a court under this subsection may be reviewed only by the Supreme Court under section 1254 of title 28. (c) Administrator Seeking Judicial Review of Aviation Matters. — When the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration decides that an order of the Board under section 44703(d), 44709, or 46301(d)(5) of this title will have a significant adverse impact on carrying out this chapter related to an aviation matter, the Administrator may obtain judicial review of the order under section 46110 of this title. The Administrator must be made a party to the judicial review proceedings. Findings of fact of the Board are conclusive if supported by substantial evidence. (d) Commandant Seeking Judicial Review of Maritime Matters. — If the Commandant of the Coast Guard decides that an order of the Board issued under a review of a Coast Guard action under section 1133 of this title will have an adverse impact on maritime safety or security, the Commandant may obtain judicial review of the order under subsection (a). The Commandant, in the official capacity of the Commandant, must be a party to the judicial review proceedings.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)General.—

The appropriate court of appeals of the United States or the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit may review a final order of the National Transportation Safety Board under this chapter. A person disclosing a substantial interest in the order may apply for review by filing a petition not later than 60 days after the order of the Board is issued.

(b)Persons Seeking Judicial Review of Aviation Matters.—
(1)

A person disclosing a substantial interest in an order related to an aviation matter issued by the Board under this chapter may apply for review of the order by filing a petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit or in the court of appeals of the United States for the circuit in which the person resides or has its principal place of business. The petition must be filed not later than 60 days after the order is issued. The court may allow the petition to be filed after the 60 days only if there was a reasonable ground for not filing within that 60-day period.

(2)

When a petition is filed under paragraph (1) of this subsection, the clerk of the court immediately shall send a copy of the petition to the Board. The Board shall file with the court a record of the proceeding in which the order was issued.

(3)

When the petition is sent to the Board, the court has exclusive jurisdiction to affirm, amend, modify, or set aside any part of the order and may order the Board to conduct further proceedings. After reasonable notice to the Board, the court may grant interim relief by staying the order or taking other appropriate action when cause for its action exists. Findings of fact by the Board, if supported by substantial evidence, are conclusive.

(4)

In reviewing an order under this subsection, the court may consider an objection to an order of the Board only if the objection was made in the proceeding conducted by the Board or if there was a reasonable ground for not making the objection in the proceeding.

(5)

A decision by a court under this subsection may be reviewed only by the Supreme Court under section 1254 of title 28.

(c)Administrator Seeking Judicial Review of Aviation Matters.—

When the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration decides that an order of the Board under section 44703(d), 44709, or 46301(d)(5) of this title will have a significant adverse impact on carrying out this chapter related to an aviation matter, the Administrator may obtain judicial review of the order under section 46110 of this title. The Administrator shall be made a party to the judicial review proceedings. Findings of fact of the Board are conclusive if supported by substantial evidence.

(d)Commandant Seeking Judicial Review of Maritime Matters.—

If the Commandant of the Coast Guard decides that an order of the Board issued pursuant to a review of a Coast Guard action under section 1133 of this title will have an adverse impact on maritime safety or security, the Commandant may obtain judicial review of the order under subsection (a). The Commandant, in the official capacity of the Commandant, shall be a party to the judicial review proceedings.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 103–272, § 1(d), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 756; Pub. L. 108–293, title VI, § 622, Aug. 9, 2004, 118 Stat. 1063; Pub. L. 112–95, title III, § 301(b), Feb. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 56.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1994Enacted · Pub. L. 103-272 · 108 Stat. 756
  • 2004Amended · Pub. L. 108-293 · 118 Stat. 1063
  • 2012Amended · Pub. L. 112-95 · 126 Stat. 56

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 103-272 on 1994-07-05.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case