ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

49 U.S.C. § 33106Exemption for passenger motor vehicles equipped with anti-theft devices

submitted 32 years ago by Pub. L. 103-272 to r/title-49-TRANSPORTATION · 539 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A manufacturer can ask for an exemption from parts marking by using an anti-theft device instead. Only a limited number of lines can be exempted each model year. The Secretary must decide within 120 days, and can later cancel an exemption that isn't working.

(a) Definitions — (1) "Anti-theft device" means a theft-deterrent device that (A) is in addition to what federal safety standard 114 already requires; (B) the manufacturer believes will actually help reduce or deter theft; and (C) doesn't use a signal reserved by state law for police, emergency, or school vehicles. (2) "Standard equipment" means equipment already installed when the vehicle is delivered from the manufacturer, not an optional accessory the first buyer chooses separately. (b) Granting Exemptions and Limitations — (1) A manufacturer may petition the Secretary of Transportation for an exemption from a section 33102 or 33103 standard for a line equipped as standard equipment with an anti-theft device the Secretary believes will work as well as the marking standard at deterring theft. (2) The Secretary may grant exemptions: (A) for model year 1987, up to 2 lines per manufacturer; (B) for each model year 1988–1996, up to 2 more lines; (C) for each model year 1997–2000, up to 1 more line; and (D) for model years after 2000, however many lines the Attorney General decides under section 33103(d)(3). (3) A later exemption granted under (2)(B) or (C) doesn't cancel an earlier one. (c) Petitioning Procedure — A petition must be filed at least 8 months before production starts for the first covered model year. It must include (1) a detailed description of the device; (2) the manufacturer's reasons for believing it will effectively deter theft; and (3) any other information the Secretary reasonably needs to decide. (d) Decisions and Approvals — The Secretary must decide on a petition within 120 days of filing. An approval must rest on substantial evidence. The Secretary may approve a petition in whole or part. If the Secretary misses the 120-day deadline, the petition is automatically approved, and the manufacturer is exempt for that line for the following model year. (e) Rescissions — The Secretary may cancel an exemption if the anti-theft device turns out not to work as well as the marking standard. A cancellation can only take effect (1) for a model year after the year it's decided, and (2) at least 6 months after the manufacturer gets written notice.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Definitions.—

In this section—

(1)

“anti-theft device” means a device to reduce or deter theft that—

(A)

is in addition to the theft-deterrent devices required by motor vehicle safety standard numbered 114 in section 571.114 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations;

(B)

the manufacturer believes will be effective in reducing or deterring theft of motor vehicles; and

(C)

does not use a signaling device reserved by State law for use on police, emergency, or official vehicles, or on schoolbuses.

(2)

“standard equipment” means equipment already installed in a motor vehicle when it is delivered from the manufacturer and not an accessory or other item that the first purchaser customarily has the option to have installed.

(b)Granting Exemptions and Limitations.—
(1)

A manufacturer may petition the Secretary of Transportation for an exemption from a requirement of a standard prescribed under section 33102 or 33103 of this title for a line of passenger motor vehicles equipped as standard equipment with an anti-theft device that the Secretary decides is likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the standard.

(2)

The Secretary may grant an exemption—

(A)

for model year 1987, for not more than 2 lines of a manufacturer;

(B)

for each of the model years 1988–1996, for not more than 2 additional lines of a manufacturer;

(C)

for each of the model years 1997–2000, for not more than one additional line of a manufacturer; and

(D)

for each of the model years after model year 2000, for the number of lines that the Attorney General decides under section 33103(d)(3) of this title.

(3)

An additional exemption granted under paragraph (2)(B) or (C) of this subsection does not affect an exemption previously granted.

(c)Petitioning Procedure.—

A petition must be filed not later than 8 months before the start of production for the first model year covered by the petition. The petition must include—

(1)

a detailed description of the device;

(2)

the reasons for the manufacturer’s conclusion that the device will be effective in reducing and deterring theft of motor vehicles; and

(3)

additional information the Secretary reasonably may require to make the decision described in subsection (b)(1) of this section.

(d)Decisions and Approvals.—

The Secretary shall make a decision about a petition filed under this section not later than 120 days after the date the petition is filed. A decision approving a petition must be based on substantial evidence. The Secretary may approve a petition in whole or in part. If the Secretary does not make a decision within the 120-day period, the petition shall be deemed to be approved and the manufacturer shall be exempt from the standard for the line covered by the petition for the subsequent model year.

(e)Rescissions.—

The Secretary may rescind an exemption if the Secretary decides that the anti-theft device has not been as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the standard. A rescission may be effective only—

(1)

for a model year after the model year in which the rescission occurs; and

(2)

at least 6 months after the manufacturer receives written notice of the rescission from the Secretary.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 103–272, § 1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1082; Pub. L. 103–429, § 6(45), Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4383.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1994Enacted · Pub. L. 103-272 · 108 Stat. 1082
  • 1994Amended · Pub. L. 103-429 · 108 Stat. 4383

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 103-272 on 1994-07-05.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case