ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

5 U.S.C. § 5508 — Officer entitled to leave; effect on pay status

submitted 60 years ago by Pub. L. 89-554 to r/title-5-GOVERNMENT-ORGANIZATION-AND-EMPLOYEES · 44 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

An executive-branch or District of Columbia officer covered by the specified leave chapter is not entitled to office pay merely because the person is an officer.

An executive-branch officer, or District of Columbia government officer, to whom title 5, chapter 63, subchapter I applies is not entitled to the office’s pay solely because of officer status.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

An officer in the executive branch and an officer of the government of the District of Columbia to whom subchapter I of chapter 63 of this title applies are not entitled to the pay of their offices solely because of their status as officers.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 477.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1966Enacted · Pub. L. 89-554 · 80 Stat. 477

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 89-554 on 1966-09-06.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case