ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

50 U.S.C. § 206 — Suspension of commercial intercourse with part of State in insurrection

submitted date unrecorded by Congress to r/title-50-WAR-AND-NATIONAL-DEFENSE · 79 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

If part of a state isn't officially declared to be in insurrection but is controlled by insurgents, or is close to insurgent-controlled areas, trade there gets restricted. That trade becomes subject to the same limits section 205 sets, for as long as needed to protect the public. The Secretary of the Treasury directs this, with the President's approval.

If part of a state has not been officially declared to be in insurrection, but insurgents actually control it, or it sits dangerously close to insurgent-controlled territory, all trade in and with that area becomes subject to the same restrictions and conditions that section 205 of this title sets. This restriction lasts as long, and reaches as far, as needed to protect the public interest. The Secretary of the Treasury directs how this works, and needs the President's approval to do so.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Whenever any part of a State not declared to be in insurrection is under the control of insurgents, or is in dangerous proximity to places under their control, all commercial intercourse therein and therewith shall be subject to the prohibitions and conditions of section 205 of this title for such time and to such extent as shall become necessary to protect the public interests, and be directed by the Secretary of the Treasury, with the approval of the President.

Source credit: (R.S. § 5302.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit

A history note hasn’t been published yet.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case