ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

6 U.S.C. § 194Enhancement of public safety communications interoperability

submitted 22 years ago by Pub. L. 108-458 to r/title-6-DOMESTIC-SECURITY · 1,399 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law creates a federal program to help responders talk to each other in emergencies. It funds standards, research, and grants for compatible communication systems. It also lets the government make multi-year funding commitments for these projects.

(a) Coordination of public safety interoperable communications programs. (1) Program. The Secretary of Homeland Security, working with the Secretary of Commerce and the Chairman of the FCC, must set up a program to improve how public safety agencies at every level of government can communicate with each other ("interoperable communications"). This program must: (A) build one comprehensive national approach to achieving interoperable communications; (B) coordinate with other federal agencies on that approach; (C) work with other federal agencies and state and local authorities to set minimum interoperability requirements for federal, state, and local public safety agencies; (D) speed up — working with agencies like the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the private sector, and standards organizations — the creation of national voluntary standards for interoperable communications. This must account for: (i) the value, lifespan, and technical abilities of current communications equipment; (ii) the need for interoperability across state and national borders; (iii) the special needs of small, rural communities; and (iv) interoperability needs for both everyday work and disasters; (E) encourage flexible, open communications systems — using currently available technology where possible, with proper security — for both short-term and long-term interoperability solutions; (F) help other federal agencies set research and testing priorities for interoperable communications; (G) set the Department of Homeland Security's own research and testing priorities for interoperable communications; (H) create coordinated guidance for federal grant programs on interoperable communications; (I) give technical help to state and local public safety agencies on planning, buying strategies, system architecture, and training; (J) develop and share best practices for improving interoperability; and (K) set performance measures and milestones — including the development of voluntary national standards — to track the nation's progress. (2) Office for Interoperability and Compatibility. The Secretary may create this office inside the Science and Technology Directorate to carry out subsection (a). If created, the office must: (i) carry out the Department's responsibilities for the SAFECOM Program, and (ii) carry out section 510 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (added by subsection (d)). (3) Authorization of appropriations. Congress may give the Secretary this much money to carry out this subsection: $22,105,000 for 2005; $22,768,000 for 2006; $23,451,000 for 2007; $24,155,000 for 2008; and $24,879,000 for 2009. (b) Report. Within 120 days after December 17, 2004, the Secretary must report to Congress on the Department's plans, schedule, and progress for developing national voluntary standards for interoperable communications. (c) International interoperability. Within 18 months after December 17, 2004, the President must set up a way to coordinate cross-border communications issues between the United States and Canada, and between the United States and Mexico. (d) [Omitted from this title.] (e) Multiyear interoperability grants. (1) Multiyear commitments. When awarding grants to a state, region, local government, or Indian tribe to improve emergency responders' interoperable communications, the Secretary may commit to give federal money beyond the current fiscal year, subject to the limits below. (2) Restrictions. (A) No multiyear commitment can last more than 3 years. (B) The total amount the Secretary commits to future fiscal years under paragraph (1) cannot exceed $150,000,000. (3) Letters of intent. (A) The Secretary may send an applicant a letter of intent promising to pay, from future budget money, an amount — no more than the federal government's share — for an interoperability project, including interest and planning costs. (B) That letter must set a schedule for repaying the applicant's share of costs as money becomes available, if the applicant starts the project after getting the letter but before getting an actual grant. (C) An applicant who gets a letter of intent must tell the Secretary before starting the project. (D) The Secretary must notify Congress in writing at least 3 days before sending out a letter of intent. (E) A letter of intent is not a government obligation under section 1501 of title 31, and is not treated as a binding commitment to pay — an actual obligation can only happen once Congress provides the money through authorization and appropriations laws. (F) Nothing in this subsection stops money from being obligated under a letter of intent in the same fiscal year the letter is issued, or applies to other interoperable-communications funding given outside this subsection. (f) Interoperable communications plans. Anyone applying to the Secretary for interoperable communications funding must first submit an Interoperable Communications Plan for approval. That plan must: (1) describe the current state of interoperability among federal, state, and local responders and other relevant resources in the area; (2) describe the public safety spectrum and resources available and planned for interoperable use; (3) explain how that planned use fits with the interoperability plans of nearby governments, military bases, foreign governments, and critical infrastructure; (4) include a 5-year plan to build a consistent, secure, effective interoperable system — covering planning, design, testing, buying, installing, training, and maintenance; (5) explain how that 5-year plan meets or exceeds the Secretary's standards and grant requirements; (6) describe who helped create the plan and over what time frame; and (7) explain how input was gathered from every part of the jurisdiction, including high-threat urban areas, and how that input will keep being gathered. (g) Definitions. (1) "Interoperable communications" means the ability of emergency responders and relevant government agencies to talk to each other as needed, using a dedicated public safety network, and to exchange voice, data, and video on demand and in real time. (2) "Emergency response providers" has the same meaning given in section 101 of this title. (h) [Omitted from this title.] (i) Sense of Congress regarding interoperable communications. (1) Congress finds that many first responders — within the same jurisdiction or across different ones — cannot effectively communicate with each other, and that this threatens public safety and can needlessly cost lives and property. (2) It is Congress's view that interoperable emergency communication systems and radios should keep being rolled out as soon as practical for first responders, and that new and upgraded digital systems and radios must meet the leading national voluntary standards for interoperability.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Coordination of public safety interoperable communications programs
(1) Program

The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce and the Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, shall establish a program to enhance public safety interoperable communications at all levels of government. Such program shall—

(A)

establish a comprehensive national approach to achieving public safety interoperable communications;

(B)

coordinate with other Federal agencies in carrying out subparagraph (A);

(C)

develop, in consultation with other appropriate Federal agencies and State and local authorities, appropriate minimum capabilities for communications interoperability for Federal, State, and local public safety agencies;

(D)

accelerate, in consultation with other Federal agencies, including the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the private sector, and nationally recognized standards organizations as appropriate, the development of national voluntary consensus standards for public safety interoperable communications, recognizing—

(i)

the value, life cycle, and technical capabilities of existing communications infrastructure;

(ii)

the need for cross-border interoperability between States and nations;

(iii)

the unique needs of small, rural communities; and

(iv)

the interoperability needs for daily operations and catastrophic events;

(E)

encourage the development and implementation of flexible and open architectures incorporating, where possible, technologies that currently are commercially available, with appropriate levels of security, for short-term and long-term solutions to public safety communications interoperability;

(F)

assist other Federal agencies in identifying priorities for research, development, and testing and evaluation with regard to public safety interoperable communications;

(G)

identify priorities within the Department of Homeland Security for research, development, and testing and evaluation with regard to public safety interoperable communications;

(H)

establish coordinated guidance for Federal grant programs for public safety interoperable communications;

(I)

provide technical assistance to State and local public safety agencies regarding planning, acquisition strategies, interoperability architectures, training, and other functions necessary to achieve public safety communications interoperability;

(J)

develop and disseminate best practices to improve public safety communications interoperability; and

(K)

develop appropriate performance measures and milestones to systematically measure the Nation’s progress toward achieving public safety communications interoperability, including the development of national voluntary consensus standards.

(2) Office for Interoperability and Compatibility
(A) Establishment of Office

The Secretary may establish an Office for Interoperability and Compatibility within the Directorate of Science and Technology to carry out this subsection.

(B) Functions

If the Secretary establishes such office, the Secretary shall, through such office—

(i)

carry out Department of Homeland Security responsibilities and authorities relating to the SAFECOM Program; and

(ii)

carry out section 510 1 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, as added by subsection (d).

(3) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this subsection—

(A)

$22,105,000 for fiscal year 2005;

(B)

$22,768,000 for fiscal year 2006;

(C)

$23,451,000 for fiscal year 2007;

(D)

$24,155,000 for fiscal year 2008; and

(E)

$24,879,000 for fiscal year 2009.

(b) Report

Not later than 120 days after December 17, 2004, the Secretary shall report to the Congress on Department of Homeland Security plans for accelerating the development of national voluntary consensus standards for public safety interoperable communications, a schedule of milestones for such development, and achievements of such development.

(c) International interoperability

Not later than 18 months after December 17, 2004, the President shall establish a mechanism for coordinating cross-border interoperability issues between—

(1)

the United States and Canada; and

(2)

the United States and Mexico.

(d) Omitted

(e) Multiyear interoperability grants
(1) Multiyear commitments

In awarding grants to any State, region, local government, or Indian tribe for the purposes of enhancing interoperable communications capabilities for emergency response providers, the Secretary may commit to obligate Federal assistance beyond the current fiscal year, subject to the limitations and restrictions in this subsection.

(2) Restrictions
(A) Time limit

No multiyear interoperability commitment may exceed 3 years in duration.

(B) Amount of committed funds

The total amount of assistance the Secretary has committed to obligate for any future fiscal year under paragraph (1) may not exceed $150,000,000.

(3) Letters of intent
(A) Issuance

Pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary may issue a letter of intent to an applicant committing to obligate from future budget authority an amount, not more than the Federal Government’s share of the project’s cost, for an interoperability communications project (including interest costs and costs of formulating the project).

(B) Schedule

A letter of intent under this paragraph shall establish a schedule under which the Secretary will reimburse the applicant for the Federal Government’s share of the project’s costs, as amounts become available, if the applicant, after the Secretary issues the letter, carries out the project before receiving amounts under a grant issued by the Secretary.

(C) Notice to Secretary

An applicant that is issued a letter of intent under this subsection shall notify the Secretary of the applicant’s intent to carry out a project pursuant to the letter before the project begins.

(D) Notice to Congress

The Secretary shall transmit a written notification to the Congress no later than 3 days before the issuance of a letter of intent under this section.

(E) Limitations

A letter of intent issued under this section is not an obligation of the Government under section 1501 of title 31 and is not deemed to be an administrative commitment for financing. An obligation or administrative commitment may be made only as amounts are provided in authorization and appropriations laws.

(F) Statutory construction

Nothing in this subsection shall be construed—

(i)

to prohibit the obligation of amounts pursuant to a letter of intent under this subsection in the same fiscal year as the letter of intent is issued; or

(ii)

to apply to, or replace, Federal assistance intended for interoperable communications that is not provided pursuant to a commitment under this subsection.

(f) Interoperable communications plans

Any applicant requesting funding assistance from the Secretary for interoperable communications for emergency response providers shall submit an Interoperable Communications Plan to the Secretary for approval. Such a plan shall—

(1)

describe the current state of communications interoperability in the applicable jurisdictions among Federal, State, and local emergency response providers and other relevant private resources;

(2)

describe the available and planned use of public safety frequency spectrum and resources for interoperable communications within such jurisdictions;

(3)

describe how the planned use of spectrum and resources for interoperable communications is compatible with surrounding capabilities and interoperable communications plans of Federal, State, and local governmental entities, military installations, foreign governments, critical infrastructure, and other relevant entities;

(4)

include a 5-year plan for the dedication of Federal, State, and local government and private resources to achieve a consistent, secure, and effective interoperable communications system, including planning, system design and engineering, testing and technology development, procurement and installation, training, and operations and maintenance;

(5)

describe how such 5-year plan meets or exceeds any applicable standards and grant requirements established by the Secretary;

(6)

include information on the governance structure used to develop the plan, including such information about all agencies and organizations that participated in developing the plan and the scope and timeframe of the plan; and

(7)

describe the method by which multi-jurisdictional, multidisciplinary input is provided from all regions of the jurisdiction, including any high-threat urban areas located in the jurisdiction, and the process for continuing to incorporate such input.

(g) Definitions

In this section:

(1) Interoperable communications

The term “interoperable communications” means the ability of emergency response providers and relevant Federal, State, and local government agencies to communicate with each other as necessary, through a dedicated public safety network utilizing information technology systems and radio communications systems, and to exchange voice, data, and video with one another on demand, in real time, as necessary.

(2) Emergency response providers

The term “emergency response providers” has the meaning that term has under section 101 of this title.

(h) Omitted

(i) Sense of Congress regarding interoperable communications
(1) Finding

The Congress finds that—

(A)

many first responders working in the same jurisdiction or in different jurisdictions cannot effectively and efficiently communicate with one another; and

(B)

their inability to do so threatens the public’s safety and may result in unnecessary loss of lives and property.

(2) Sense of Congress

It is the sense of Congress that interoperable emergency communications systems and radios should continue to be deployed as soon as practicable for use by the first responder community, and that upgraded and new digital communications systems and new digital radios must meet prevailing national, voluntary consensus standards for interoperability.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 108–458, title VII, § 7303, Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3843; Pub. L. 110–53, title III, § 301(c), Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 299.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2004Enacted · Pub. L. 108-458 · 118 Stat. 3843
  • 2007Amended · Pub. L. 110-53 · 121 Stat. 299

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 108-458 on 2004-12-17.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case