ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

7 U.S.C. § 27dAdministration of the predominance test

submitted 26 years ago by Pub. L. 106-554 to r/title-7-AGRICULTURE · 609 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The CFTC can only regulate a hybrid banking instrument if it makes a rule finding this is necessary, matches the Commodity Exchange Act's goals, and shows the instrument fails the predominance test. Before making that rule, the CFTC must consult the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board, or any harmed party, can challenge the CFTC's rule in federal court.

(a) In general No part of the Commodity Exchange Act applies to a hybrid instrument, and the CFTC may not regulate it, unless the CFTC determines — by or under a rule issued under this section — that: (1) the action is necessary and appropriate in the public interest; (2) the action is consistent with the Commodity Exchange Act and its purposes; and (3) the instrument is not predominantly a banking product under the predominance test in section 27c(b) of this title. (b) Consultation Before starting a rulemaking or making a determination under sections 27 to 27f of this title, the CFTC must consult with and seek the agreement of the Federal Reserve Board's Board of Governors, about: (1) the nature of the hybrid instrument; and (2) the history, purpose, extent, and appropriateness of regulating it under the Commodity Exchange Act and under appropriate banking laws. (c) Objection to Commission regulation (1) The Federal Reserve Board's Board of Governors may seek review of any rule or determination under (a) in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, by filing a written petition within 60 days of the rule or determination's publication, asking the court to set it aside. The court must expedite any such challenge. (2) The court clerk transmits a copy of the petition to the CFTC. The CFTC must then file with the court the rule or determination under review, plus any documents it refers to, and other relevant materials the court prescribes. (3) Once the petition is filed, the court gets jurisdiction over the matter — which becomes exclusive once the CFTC files its materials — to affirm and enforce, or set aside, the rule or determination. (4) The court decides whether to affirm and enforce, or set aside, the rule or determination, based on: (A) whether the product is predominantly a banking product; and (B) whether applying the Commodity Exchange Act provisions at issue is appropriate given the history, purpose, and extent of regulation under that Act, these sections, and the appropriate banking laws — giving deference to neither the CFTC's nor the Federal Reserve Board's views. (5) Filing the Board's petition operates as a judicial stay — pausing the rule — until the court's determination is final, including any appeal. (6) Any other aggrieved party may also seek judicial review of a CFTC determination or rulemaking under this section, under section 6(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) In general

No provision of the Commodity Exchange Act [7 U.S.C. 1 et seq.] shall apply to, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission shall not regulate, a hybrid instrument, unless the Commission determines, by or under a rule issued in accordance with this section, that—

(1)

the action is necessary and appropriate in the public interest;

(2)

the action is consistent with the Commodity Exchange Act [7 U.S.C. 1 et seq.] and the purposes of the Commodity Exchange Act; and

(3)

the hybrid instrument is not predominantly a banking product under the predominance test set forth in section 27c(b) of this title.

(b) Consultation

Before commencing a rulemaking or making a determination pursuant to a rule issued under sections 27 to 27f of this title, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission shall consult with and seek the concurrence of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System concerning—

(1)

the nature of the hybrid instrument; and

(2)

the history, purpose, extent, and appropriateness of the regulation of the hybrid instrument under the Commodity Exchange Act [7 U.S.C. 1 et seq.] and under appropriate banking laws.

(c) Objection to Commission regulation
(1) Filing of petition for review

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System may obtain review of any rule or determination referred to in subsection (a) in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit by filing in the court, not later than 60 days after the date of publication of the rule or determination, a written petition requesting that the rule or determination be set aside. Any proceeding to challenge any such rule or determination shall be expedited by the court.

(2) Transmittal of petition and record

A copy of a petition described in paragraph (1) shall be transmitted as soon as possible by the Clerk of the court to an officer or employee of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission designated for that purpose. Upon receipt of the petition, the Commission shall file with the court the rule or determination under review and any documents referred to therein, and any other relevant materials prescribed by the court.

(3) Exclusive jurisdiction

On the date of the filing of a petition under paragraph (1), the court shall have jurisdiction, which shall become exclusive on the filing of the materials set forth in paragraph (2), to affirm and enforce or to set aside the rule or determination at issue.

(4) Standard of review

The court shall determine to affirm and enforce or set aside a rule or determination of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission under this section, based on the determination of the court as to whether—

(A)

the subject product is predominantly a banking product; and

(B)

making the provision or provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act [7 U.S.C. 1 et seq.] at issue applicable to the subject instrument is appropriate in light of the history, purpose, and extent of regulation under such Act, sections 27 to 27f of this title, and under the appropriate banking laws, giving deference neither to the views of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission nor the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

(5) Judicial stay

The filing of a petition by the Board pursuant to paragraph (1) shall operate as a judicial stay, until the date on which the determination of the court is final (including any appeal of the determination).

(6) Other authority to challenge

Any aggrieved party may seek judicial review pursuant to section 6(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act [7 U.S.C. 9] of a determination or rulemaking by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission under this section.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 106–554, § 1(a)(5) [title IV, § 406], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–459.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2000Enacted · Pub. L. 106-554 · 114 Stat. 2763, 2763

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 106-554 on 2000-12-21.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case