7 U.S.C. § 3319a — Cost-reimbursable agreements
submitted 41 years ago by Pub. L. 95-113 to r/title-7-AGRICULTURE · 87 words · no verdicts yet
This section lets the Secretary of Agriculture enter cost-reimbursable agreements for agricultural research, extension, or teaching without competition requirements. Reimbursement may cover agreed direct costs and indirect costs up to 10 percent of direct costs.
Despite any other law, the Secretary* of Agriculture may enter into cost-reimbursable agreements with State cooperative institutions* or other colleges and universities without regard to any requirement for competition, for the acquisition of goods or services, including personal services, to carry out agricultural research*, extension*, or teaching* activities of mutual interest. Reimbursable costs under such agreements must include the actual direct costs of performance, as mutually agreed on by the parties, and the indirect costs of performance, not exceeding 10 percent of the direct cost.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary* of Agriculture may enter into cost-reimbursable agreements with State cooperative institutions* or other colleges and universities without regard to any requirement for competition, for the acquisition of goods or services, including personal services, to carry out agricultural research*, extension*, or teaching* activities of mutual interest. Reimbursable costs under such agreements shall include the actual direct costs of performance, as mutually agreed on by the parties, and the indirect costs of performance, not exceeding 10 percent of the direct cost.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, § 1473A, as added Pub. L. 99–198, title XIV, § 1426, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1553; amended Pub. L. 105–185, title II, § 231, June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 547.)
- 1985Enacted · Pub. L. 95-113 · 99 Stat. 1553
- 1998Amended · Pub. L. 105-185 · 112 Stat. 547
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 95-113 on 1985-12-23.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case