ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

7 U.S.C. § 52Use of nonofficial standards prohibited; sales by sample excepted

submitted 103 years ago by ch. 288 to r/title-7-AGRICULTURE · 162 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Cotton cannot legally be marked, described, sold, or shipped under any grade or classification standard other than the official U.S. cotton standards. This ban does not apply to cotton sold strictly by an actual physical sample.

It is unlawful to mark, describe, sell, or ship cotton in interstate or foreign commerce using any classification, grade, or standard other than the official standards established under this chapter — except when the cotton is sold strictly by reference to an actual physical sample, rather than by a named grade.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

It shall be unlawful (a) in or in connection with any transaction or shipment in commerce made after August 1, 1923, or (b) in any publication of a price or quotation determined in or in connection with any transaction or shipment in commerce after August 1, 1923, or (c) in any classification for the purposes of or in connection with a transaction or shipment in commerce after August 1, 1923, for any person to indicate for any cotton a grade or other class which is of or within the official cotton standards of the United States then in effect under this chapter by a name, description, or designation, or any system of names, description, or designation not used in said standards: Provided, That nothing herein shall prevent a transaction otherwise lawful by actual sample or on the basis of a private type which is used in good faith and not in evasion of or substitution for said standards.

Source credit: (Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 288, § 2, 42 Stat. 1517.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1923Enacted · Act of Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 288 · 42 Stat. 1517

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 288 on 1923-03-04.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case