ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

7 U.S.C. § 62Definitions

submitted 103 years ago by ch. 288 to r/title-7-AGRICULTURE · 99 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law defines three words used in this chapter: "person," "commerce," and "cotton." Commerce means trade crossing state or district lines, and cotton means any variety grown in the continental United States, including linters.

This section defines three words for this chapter: (a) "Person" can mean one person or several, and includes an individual, a partnership, a corporation, or two or more people who share a joint or common interest. (b) "Commerce" means commerce between a state or the District of Columbia and somewhere outside it, or between points in the same state or the District of Columbia that passes through somewhere outside it, or within the District of Columbia. (c) "Cotton" means cotton of any variety grown within the continental United States, including linters.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Wherever used in this chapter, (a) the word “person” imports the plural or the singular, as the case demands, and includes an individual, a partnership, a corporation, or two or more persons having a joint or common interest; (b) the word “commerce” means commerce between any State or the District of Columbia and any place outside thereof, or between points within the same State or the District of Columbia but through any place outside thereof, or within the District of Columbia; and (c) the word “cotton” means cotton of any variety produced within the continental United States, including linters.

Source credit: (Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 288, § 11, 42 Stat. 1519.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1923Enacted · Act of Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 288 · 42 Stat. 1519

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 288 on 1923-03-04.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case