ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

7 U.S.C. § 8740 — Adjustments of loans

submitted 18 years ago by Pub. L. 110-234 to r/title-7-AGRICULTURE · 607 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Secretary may adjust loan rates for most commodities based on grade, quality, and location, keeping the national average level the same. Cotton has special mandatory and optional quality adjustments made after consulting the cotton industry. Rice loan rates can only be adjusted for grade and quality, including milling yield.

(a) Adjustment authority. Subject to subsection (e), the Secretary may make appropriate adjustments to the loan rates for any loan commodity except cotton, to account for differences in grade, type, quality, location, and other factors.

(b) Manner of adjustment. These adjustments must, as much as practical, be made so that the average loan level for the commodity — given how often each factor is expected to come up — equals the level of support set elsewhere in this subtitle and subtitles B through E.

(c) Adjustment on county basis. (1) In general. The Secretary may set loan rates for a crop by county, as long as the lowest county rate stays at least 95 percent of the national average loan rate, and as long as this does not increase total spending. (2) Prohibition. These county adjustments cannot raise the national average loan rate for the commodity in any year.

(d) Adjustment in loan rate for cotton. (1) In general. The Secretary may make appropriate adjustments to cotton's loan rate for quality differences. (2) Revisions to quality adjustments for upland cotton. (A) In general. Within 180 days of enactment, the Secretary must put in place revisions to how the upland cotton marketing loan program is run, to more accurately and efficiently reflect cotton's market value. (B) Mandatory revisions. These required revisions must: (i) eliminate differences in payment based on warehouse location; (ii) set premium or discount differences for the various quality factors and staple lengths, using a three-year weighted moving average from the designated regional spot markets; (iii) remove any artificial split in the premium or discount between cotton with a 32 and a 33 staple length caused by micronaire (fiber fineness); and (iv) make sure no premium or discount is set higher than the one tied to a leaf grade that is one step better than the matching color grade. (C) Discretionary revisions. These optional revisions may include: (i) using price data beyond just the spot markets, to make quality-based pricing more accurate; (ii) adjusting the premiums or discounts for cotton with a 33-or-higher staple length, tied to micronaire, to remove unnecessary artificial splits; and (iii) any other adjustments the Secretary decides are appropriate, after consulting as described in paragraph (3). (3) Consultation with private sector. (A) Prior to revision. Before adjusting cotton's loan rate (or reviewing past adjustments) under this subsection, the Secretary must consult with representatives of the U.S. cotton industry. (B) Inapplicability of chapter 10 of title 5. The usual federal advisory-committee rules in chapter 10 of title 5 do not apply to these consultations. (4) Review of adjustments. The Secretary may review how the upland cotton quality adjustments are working, and may make further revisions by revoking or revising actions taken under paragraph (2)(B) or (2)(C).

(e) Rice. The Secretary cannot adjust the loan rates for long grain rice and medium grain rice, except for differences in grade and quality — including milling yield.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Adjustment authority

Subject to subsection (e), the Secretary may make appropriate adjustments in the loan rates for any loan commodity (other than cotton) for differences in grade, type, quality, location, and other factors.

(b) Manner of adjustment

The adjustments under subsection (a) shall, to the maximum extent practicable, be made in such a manner that the average loan level for the commodity will, on the basis of the anticipated incidence of the factors, be equal to the level of support determined in accordance with this subtitle and subtitles B through E.1

(c) Adjustment on county basis
(1) In general

The Secretary may establish loan rates for a crop for producers in individual counties in a manner that results in the lowest loan rate being 95 percent of the national average loan rate, if those loan rates do not result in an increase in outlays.

(2) Prohibition

Adjustments under this subsection shall not result in an increase in the national average loan rate for any year.

(d) Adjustment in loan rate for cotton
(1) In general

The Secretary may make appropriate adjustments in the loan rate for cotton for differences in quality factors.

(2) Revisions to quality adjustments for upland cotton
(A) In general

Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall implement revisions in the administration of the marketing assistance loan program for upland cotton to more accurately and efficiently reflect market values for upland cotton.

(B) Mandatory revisions

Revisions under subparagraph (A) shall include—

(i)

the elimination of warehouse location differentials;

(ii)

the establishment of differentials for the various quality factors and staple lengths of cotton based on a 3-year, weighted moving average of the weighted designated spot market regions, as determined by regional production;

(iii)

the elimination of any artificial split in the premium or discount between upland cotton with a 32 or 33 staple length due to micronaire; and

(iv)

a mechanism to ensure that no premium or discount is established that exceeds the premium or discount associated with a leaf grade that is 1 better than the applicable color grade.

(C) Discretionary revisions

Revisions under subparagraph (A) may include—

(i)

the use of non-spot market price data, in addition to spot market price data, that would enhance the accuracy of the price information used in determining quality adjustments under this subsection;

(ii)

adjustments in the premiums or discounts associated with upland cotton with a staple length of 33 or above due to micronaire with the goal of eliminating any unnecessary artificial splits in the calculations of the premiums or discounts; and

(iii)

such other adjustments as the Secretary determines appropriate, after consultations conducted in accordance with paragraph (3).

(3) Consultation with private sector
(A) Prior to revision

In making adjustments to the loan rate for cotton (including any review of the adjustments) as provided in this subsection, the Secretary shall consult with representatives of the United States cotton industry.

(B) Inapplicability of chapter 10 of title 5

Chapter 10 of title 5 shall not apply to consultations under this subsection.

(4) Review of adjustments

The Secretary may review the operation of the upland cotton quality adjustments implemented pursuant to this subsection and may make further revisions to the administration of the loan program for upland cotton, by—

(A)

revoking or revising any actions taken under paragraph (2)(B); or

(B)

revoking or revising any actions taken or authorized to be taken under paragraph (2)(C).

(e) Rice

The Secretary shall not make adjustments in the loan rates for long grain rice and medium grain rice, except for differences in grade and quality (including milling yields).

Source credit: (Pub. L. 110–234, title I, § 1210, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 965; Pub. L. 110–246, § 4(a), title I, § 1210, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1693; Pub. L. 117–286, § 4(a)(42), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4310.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2008Enacted · Pub. L. 110-234 · 122 Stat. 965
  • 2008Amended · Pub. L. 110-246 · 122 Stat. 1664, 1693
  • 2022Amended · Pub. L. 117-286 · 136 Stat. 4310

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 110-234 on 2008-05-22.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case