ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

10 U.S.C. § 183aMilitary Aviation and Installation Assurance Clearinghouse for review of mission obstructions

submitted 9 years ago by Pub. L. 115-91 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 2,817 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Secretary of Defense must run a Clearinghouse that reviews proposed energy and antenna projects for risks to military operations, works with project developers and governors to fix problems, and can find a project poses an unacceptable risk to national security. The Secretary may accept voluntary funding from applicants to help pay for mitigation.

(a) Establishment. (1) The Secretary of Defense must set up a Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Siting Clearinghouse, called "the Clearinghouse." (2) The Clearinghouse works under an Assistant Secretary of Defense the Secretary picks, and gets whatever staff and resources the Secretary thinks it needs. (b) Functions. (1) The Clearinghouse coordinates the Department's review of energy-project and antenna-structure-project applications that come from the Secretary of Transportation under section 44718 of title 49, and it must make sure nearby military bases are consulted. (2) It speeds up building the planning tools needed to judge whether such projects are acceptable to the Department. (3) It does any other job the Secretary of Defense assigns. (c) Review of Proposed Actions. (1) Within 75 days of getting a proper application that might hurt military operations, the Clearinghouse must do a preliminary review that: (A) judges how big, how long, and how risky any harm to military readiness would be; and (B) identifies affordable fixes the Department, the developer, or others could make to reduce the risk while still letting the project go forward. (2)(A) If the Clearinghouse finds a likely adverse impact, it sends the applicant a "notice of presumed risk" explaining the Department's concerns and inviting talks about fixes. (B) After that notice, the parties should try to find affordable fixes together. (C) This notice is only a preliminary opinion, not a formal objection under (e) — talks afterward could resolve the concerns. (3) At the same time, the Clearinghouse sends the same notice to the state's governor and asks for comments; the governor gets at least 30 days to respond and must be given enough information to understand the risk. The Secretary of Defense must consider the governor's comments and include them with the finding sent to the Secretary of Transportation. (4) If the Secretary later decides the project won't actually hurt military readiness, the Clearinghouse must tell the applicant and governor in writing. (5) The Clearinghouse must build, with other federal agencies, a review process that gives timely notice about risky projects. (6) It must set up procedures — including guidance for every U.S. military base — for handling review requests from other agencies, states, tribes, local governments, landowners, or developers. (7) It must set up early-outreach procedures so parties planning risky projects near military training routes or certain radar systems file a project layout at least one year before construction begins, giving time to negotiate fixes; any material a filer marks as proprietary or sensitive must be kept from public release. (8) If the Clearinghouse finds no adverse impact, it must tell the Secretary of Transportation, in writing within five business days, "No Part 77 concerns, national security review ongoing." (d) Comprehensive Review. (1) The Secretary of Defense must build a broad strategy addressing how these projects affect the military. (2) In doing so, the Secretary must: (A) assess how much interference these projects cause; (B) — only to guide preliminary reviews and early outreach — identify specific geographic areas, including military training routes and areas near intercontinental ballistic missile facilities, where such projects could hurt readiness, and rank the risk in each area; (C) set up procedures to first identify those areas, including public notice and comment before finalizing them, with maps and explanations; (D) set up procedures to periodically review, update, and add to those areas, again with public notice and comment; (E) after the comment period, either make the final decision on an area itself or delegate that decision to the Deputy Secretary of Defense, an Under Secretary, a Deputy Under Secretary, or — for areas near missile facilities — the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment; and (F) identify specific long-term fixes for these problems, including: (i) research and development priorities; (ii) changes to military operations to accommodate projects; (iii) upgrades to existing systems or procedures; (iv) new systems the Department or other agencies could buy, and when; and (v) changes to the projects themselves, like size, location, or technology. (3) A state's governor may suggest more risk areas within that state, which then go through the same public notice and comment process. (4) The Clearinghouse must make the risk-area data available online. (e) Department of Defense Finding of Unacceptable Risk. (1)(A) The Secretary of Defense may only object to a project after fully considering possible fixes, and only if the Secretary decides the project — alone or combined with others — would create an unacceptable risk to national security. (B)(i) For any project with structures taller than 200 feet within two nautical miles of an active intercontinental ballistic missile facility, the Secretary must find unacceptable risk unless all such tall structures are removed from the project, once a notice of presumed risk has been sent. (ii) This rule doesn't apply to structures approved before the 2024 defense authorization law, or to structures rebuilt with updated technology in the same spot. (C) Any unacceptable-risk finding must be sent to the Secretary of Transportation for that agency's report. (2)(A) Within 30 days of finding unacceptable risk, the Secretary of Defense must report to the congressional defense committees and the Senate Commerce and House Transportation committees, explaining the operational impact, the fixes considered, and why they didn't work. The report can have a classified section; the unclassified part also goes to the project's sponsor, and the Secretary may publish notice of the finding in the Federal Register. (B) The Secretary must also notify the relevant state agency of the finding. (3) Only the Deputy Secretary of Defense, an Under Secretary, or a Deputy Under Secretary may be given the job of making this finding instead of the Secretary. (4) The Clearinghouse must develop — subject to public comment — procedures for making unacceptable-risk findings, including how to weigh combined effects of multiple projects. (f) Authority to Accept Contributions of Funds. The Secretary of Defense may ask for and accept voluntary money from a project applicant. That money stays available, with no spending deadline, to pay for fixing the project's impact on military operations or studying how to fix it. (g) Effect of Department of Defense Hazard Assessment. Nothing the Department does under this section replaces the Secretary of Transportation's own required review under section 44718 of title 49. (h) Definitions. (1) "Adverse impact on military operations and readiness" means any real, likely harm to flight operations, research and testing, or training that would weaken the armed forces' ability to fight. (2) "Antenna structure project" (A) means building a structure within two nautical miles of an active missile facility that transmits or supports antennas transmitting or receiving radio signals, and that must be reported to the FAA under existing law; (B) but does not include structures built before the 2024 defense law (even if later upgraded without becoming taller), or projects tied to, or approved for use on, the same base as a missile facility. (3) "Intercontinental ballistic missile launch facility or control center" means those at Francis E. Warren, Malmstrom, and Minot Air Force Bases and their missile fields. (4) "Energy project" means a project generating or transmitting electricity. (5) "Governor" means a state's chief executive. (6) "Landowner" means someone who owns the land where a project would sit. (7) "Military installation" has the meaning from section 2801(c)(4) of this title. (8) "Military readiness" includes combat-related training or operations, including testing and evaluation. (9) "Military training route" means a route in the Military Training Route Program, run jointly by the FAA and the Department of Defense for low-altitude, high-speed training. (10) "State" includes the states, D.C., Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and American Samoa. (11) "Unacceptable risk to national security" means a structure or landfill — built, altered, or proposed — that the Secretary can show would: (A) endanger air safety tied to Department of Defense activities; (B) interfere with efficient use of airspace tied to those activities; or (C) significantly weaken the Department's ability to train, research, test, evaluate, operate, or stay ready.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Establishment.—
(1)

The Secretary of Defense shall establish a Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Siting Clearinghouse (in this section referred to as the “Clearinghouse”).

(2)

The Clearinghouse shall be—

(A)

organized under the authority, direction, and control of an Assistant Secretary of Defense designated by the Secretary; and

(B)

assigned such personnel and resources as the Secretary considers appropriate to carry out this section.

(b)Functions.—
(1)

The Clearinghouse shall coordinate Department of Defense review of applications for energy projects or antenna structure projects filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to section 44718 of title 49 and received by the Department of Defense from the Secretary of Transportation. In performing such coordination, the Clearinghouse shall provide procedures to ensure affected local military installations are consulted.

(2)

The Clearinghouse shall accelerate the development of planning tools necessary to determine the acceptability to the Department of Defense of proposals included in an application for an energy project or antenna structure project submitted pursuant to such section.

(3)

The Clearinghouse shall perform such other functions as the Secretary of Defense assigns.

(c)Review of Proposed Actions.—
(1)

Not later than 75 days after receiving from the Secretary of Transportation a proper application for an energy project or antenna structure project under section 44718 of title 49 that may have an adverse impact on military operations and readiness, the Clearinghouse shall conduct a preliminary review of such application. The review shall—

(A)

assess the likely scope, duration, and level of risk of any adverse impact of such energy project or antenna structure project on military operations and readiness; and

(B)

identify any feasible and affordable actions that could be taken by the Department, the developer of such energy project or antenna structure project, or others to mitigate the adverse impact and to minimize risks to national security while allowing the energy project or antenna structure project to proceed with development.

(2)
(A)

If the Clearinghouse finds under paragraph (1) that an energy project or antenna structure project will have an adverse impact on military operations and readiness, the Clearinghouse shall issue to the applicant a notice of presumed risk that describes the concerns identified by the Department in the preliminary review and requests a discussion of possible mitigation actions.

(B)

After the Clearinghouse issues a notice under subparagraph (A) with respect to an energy project or antenna structure project, the parties should seek to identify feasible and affordable actions that can be taken by the Department, the developer of such energy project or antenna structure project, or others to mitigate any adverse impact on military operations and readiness.

(C)

A notice of presumed risk issued under subparagraph (A) is a preliminary assessment only and does not represent a formal objection pursuant to subsection (e). Discussions of possible mitigation actions under such subparagraph could favorably resolve any concerns identified in the notice of presumed risk.

(3)

At the same time that the Clearinghouse issues to the applicant a notice of presumed risk under paragraph (2), the Clearinghouse shall provide the same notice to the governor of the State in which the project is located and request that the governor provide the Clearinghouse any comments the governor believes of relevance to the application. The Clearinghouse shall ensure that a governor has at least 30 days after the date on which the governor receives the notice of presumed risk to provide any such comments and shall provide detailed information and other information necessary to ensure that the governor can fully understand the nature of the presumed risk. The Secretary of Defense shall consider the comments of the governor in the Secretary’s evaluation of whether the project presents an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States and shall include the comments with the finding provided to the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to section 44718(f) of title 49.

(4)

If, after issuing the notices of presumed risk required by paragraphs (2) and (3), the Secretary of Defense later concludes for any reason that the energy project or antenna structure project will not have an adverse impact on military readiness, the Clearinghouse shall notify the applicant and the governor in writing of that conclusion.

(5)

The Clearinghouse shall develop, in coordination with other departments and agencies of the Federal Government, an integrated review process to ensure timely notification and consideration of energy projects or antenna structure projects filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to section 44718 of title 49 that may have an adverse impact on military operations and readiness.

(6)

The Clearinghouse shall establish procedures for the Department of Defense for the coordinated consideration of and response to a request for a review received from another Federal agency, a State government, an Indian tribal government, a local government, a landowner, or the developer of an energy project or antenna structure project, including guidance to personnel at each military installation in the United States on how to initiate such procedures and ensure a coordinated Department response.

(7)

The Clearinghouse shall develop procedures for conducting early outreach to parties carrying out energy projects or antenna structure projects that could have an adverse impact on military operations and readiness and to clearly communicate to such parties actions being taken by the Department of Defense under this section. The procedures shall provide for filing by such parties of a project area and preliminary project layout at least one year before expected construction of any project proposed within a military training route or within line-of-sight of any air route surveillance radar, airport surveillance radar, or wide area surveillance over-the-horizon radar operated or used by the Department of Defense in order to provide adequate time for analysis and negotiation of mitigation options. Material marked as proprietary or competition sensitive by a party filing for this preliminary review shall be protected from public release by the Department of Defense.

(8)

If, in reviewing an application for an energy project or antenna structure project pursuant to paragraph (1), the Clearinghouse finds no adverse impact on military operations under section 44718(b)(1) of title 49, the Clearinghouse shall communicate to the Secretary of Transportation in writing, not later than five business days after making such finding, the following: “No Part 77 concerns, national security review ongoing.”

(d)Comprehensive Review.—
(1)

The Secretary of Defense shall develop a comprehensive strategy for addressing the impacts upon the military of projects filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to section 44718 of title 49.

(2)

In developing the strategy required by paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—

(A)

assess the magnitude of interference posed by projects filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to section 44718 of title 49;

(B)

solely for the purpose of informing preliminary reviews under subsection (c)(1) and early outreach efforts under subsection (c)(5), identify distinct geographic areas selected as proposed locations for projects filed, or for projects that are reasonably expected to be filed in the near future, with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to section 44718 of title 49 where the Secretary of Defense can demonstrate such projects could have an adverse impact on military operations and readiness, including military training routes or any active intercontinental ballistic missile launch facility or control center, and categorize the risk of adverse impact in such areas;

(C)

develop procedures for the initial identification of such geographic areas identified under subparagraph (B), to include a process to provide notice and seek public comment prior to making a final designation of the geographic areas, including maps of the area and the basis for identification;

(D)

develop procedures to periodically review and modify, consistent with the notice and public comment process under subparagraph (C), geographic areas identified under subparagraph (B) and to solicit and identify additional geographic areas as appropriate;

(E)

at the conclusion of the notice and public comment period conducted under subparagraph (C), make a final finding on the designation of a geographic area of concern or delegate the authority to make such finding to the Deputy Secretary of Defense, an Under Secretary of Defense, a Deputy Under Secretary of Defense, or, in the case of a geographic area of concern related to an active intercontinental ballistic missile launch facility or control center, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment; and

(F)

specifically identify feasible and affordable long-term actions that may be taken to mitigate adverse impacts of projects filed, or which may be filed in the future, with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to section 44718 of title 49, on military operations and readiness, including—

(i)

investment priorities of the Department of Defense with respect to research and development;

(ii)

modifications to military operations to accommodate applications for such projects;

(iii)

recommended upgrades or modifications to existing systems or procedures by the Department of Defense;

(iv)

acquisition of new systems by the Department and other departments and agencies of the Federal Government and timelines for fielding such new systems; and

(v)

modifications to the projects for which such applications are filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to section 44718 of title 49, including changes in size, location, or technology.

(3)

The governor of a State may recommend to the Secretary of Defense additional geographical areas of concern within that State. Any such recommendation shall be submitted for notice and comment pursuant to paragraph (2)(C).

(4)

The Clearinghouse shall make access to data reflecting geographic areas identified under subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) and reviewed and modified under subparagraph (C) of such paragraph available online.

(e)Department of Defense Finding of Unacceptable Risk.—
(1)
(A)

The Secretary of Defense may not object to an energy project or antenna structure project filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to section 44718 of title 49, except in a case in which the Secretary of Defense determines, after giving full consideration to mitigation actions identified pursuant to this section, that such project, in isolation or cumulatively with other projects, would result in an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States.

(B)
(i)

In the case of any energy project or antenna structure project with proposed structures more than 200 feet above ground level located within two nautical miles of the geographic center of an active intercontinental ballistic missile launch facility or control center, the Secretary of Defense shall issue a finding of unacceptable risk to national security for such project if the mitigation actions identified pursuant to this section do not include removal of all such proposed structures from such project after receiving notice of presumed risk from the Clearinghouse under subsection (c)(2).

(ii)

Clause (i) does not apply to structures approved before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 or to structures that are re-powered with updated technology in the same location as previously approved structures.

(C)

Any finding of unacceptable risk to national security by the Secretary of Defense under this paragraph shall be transmitted to the Secretary of Transportation for inclusion in the report required under section 44718(b)(2) of title 49.

(2)
(A)

Not later than 30 days after making a finding of unacceptable risk under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report on such finding and the basis for such finding. Such report shall include an explanation of the operational impact that led to the finding, a discussion of the mitigation options considered, and an explanation of why the mitigation options were not feasible or did not resolve the conflict. The report may include a classified annex. Unclassified reports shall also be provided to the project proponent. The Secretary of Defense may provide public notice through the Federal Register of the finding.

(B)

The Secretary of Defense shall notify the appropriate State agency of a finding made under paragraph (1).

(3)

The Secretary of Defense may only delegate the responsibility for making a finding of unacceptable risk under paragraph (1) to the Deputy Secretary of Defense, an Under Secretary of Defense, or a Deputy Under Secretary of Defense.

(4)

The Clearinghouse shall develop procedures for making a finding of unacceptable risk, including with respect to how to implement cumulative effects analysis. Such procedures shall be subject to public comment prior to finalization.

(f)Authority to Accept Contributions of Funds.—

The Secretary of Defense is authorized to request and accept a voluntary contribution of funds from an applicant for an energy project or antenna structure project. Amounts so accepted shall remain available until expended for the purpose of offsetting the cost of measures undertaken by the Secretary of Defense to mitigate adverse impacts of such a project on military operations and readiness or to conduct studies of potential measures to mitigate such impacts.

(g)Effect of Department of Defense Hazard Assessment.—

An action taken pursuant to this section shall not be considered to be a substitute for any assessment or determination required of the Secretary of Transportation under section 44718 of title 49.

(h)Definitions.—

In this section:

(1)

The term “adverse impact on military operations and readiness” means any adverse impact upon military operations and readiness, including flight operations, research, development, testing, and evaluation, and training, that is demonstrable and is likely to impair or degrade the ability of the armed forces to perform their warfighting missions.

(2)

The term “antenna structure project”—

(A)

means a project to construct a structure located within two nautical miles of the geographic center of any intercontinental ballistic missile launch facility or control center that—

(i)

is constructed or used to transmit radio energy or that is constructed or used for the primary purpose of supporting antennas to transmit or receive radio energy (or both), and any antennas and other appurtenances mounted on the structure, from the time construction of the supporting structure begins until such time as the supporting structure is dismantled; and

(ii)

for which notification is required to be made to the Federal Aviation Administration pursuant to processes already established by law; and

(B)

does not include—

(i)

any structure constructed before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, including any such structure which is upgraded, repaired, or otherwise modified after such date of enactment as long as such upgrade, repair, or modification has not increased the height of such structure; or

(ii)

any project in support of or required by an intercontinental ballistic missile launch facility or control center, or any other such project that has been approved by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of Defense’s designee for use on the same military installation at which such facility or control center is located.

(3)

The term “intercontinental ballistic missile launch facility or control center” means such facilities or control centers located at the Francis E. Warren Air Force Base, the Malmstrom Air Force Base, and the Minot Air Force Base, and their respective missile fields.

(4)

The term “energy project” means a project that provides for the generation or transmission of electrical energy.

(5)

The term “governor”, with respect to a State, means the chief executive officer of the State.

(6)

The term “landowner” means a person that owns a fee interest in real property on which a proposed energy project or antenna structure project is planned to be located.

(7)

The term “military installation” has the meaning given that term in section 2801(c)(4) of this title.

(8)

The term “military readiness” includes any training or operation that could be related to combat readiness, including testing and evaluation activities.

(9)

The term “military training route” means a training route developed as part of the Military Training Route Program, carried out jointly by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration and the Secretary of Defense, for use by the armed forces for the purpose of conducting low-altitude, high-speed military training.

(10)

The term “State” means the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, the United States Virgin Islands, and American Samoa.

(11)

The term “unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States” means the construction, alteration, establishment, or expansion, or the proposed construction, alteration, establishment, or expansion, of a structure or sanitary landfill, that the Secretary of Defense can demonstrate would—

(A)

endanger safety in air commerce directly related to the activities of the Department of Defense;

(B)

interfere with the efficient use of the navigable airspace directly related to the activities of the Department of Defense; or

(C)

significantly impair or degrade the capability of the Department of Defense to conduct training, research, development, testing, and evaluation, and operations or to maintain military readiness.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title III, § 311(a), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1343; amended Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title III, §§ 311, 312, 371, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1303, 1329; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title III, § 311, Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3513; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title III, § 371(b), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1663; Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title III, §§ 361, 362, Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 231; Pub. L. 118–159, div. A, title III, § 311, Dec. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 1851; Pub. L. 119–60, div. A, title XVII, § 1701(a)(5), Dec. 18, 2025, 139 Stat. 1208.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2017Enacted · Pub. L. 115-91 · 131 Stat. 1343
  • 2019Amended · Pub. L. 116-92 · 133 Stat. 1303, 1329
  • 2021Amended · Pub. L. 116-283 · 134 Stat. 3513
  • 2021Amended · Pub. L. 117-81 · 135 Stat. 1663
  • 2023Amended · Pub. L. 118-31 · 137 Stat. 231
  • 2024Amended · Pub. L. 118-159 · 138 Stat. 1851
  • 2025Amended · Pub. L. 119-60 · 139 Stat. 1208

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 115-91 on 2017-12-12.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case