ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

18 U.S.C. § 1958Use of interstate commerce facilities in the commission of murder-for-hire

submitted 42 years ago by Pub. L. 98-473 to r/title-18-CRIMES-AND-CRIMINAL-PROCEDURE · 220 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section makes it a federal crime to use interstate travel, mail, or commerce to arrange a murder-for-hire. The punishment starts at up to ten years, and rises to twenty years if there's injury. It rises to death or life imprisonment if someone dies.

(a) This section makes it a federal crime to use interstate commerce to arrange a murder-for-hire. It applies to anyone who travels, or who causes another person (even the intended victim) to travel, across state or international lines. It also applies to anyone who uses, or causes another person to use, the mail or any interstate commerce facility. The person must intend for a murder to happen, in violation of state or federal law. The murder must be in exchange for money or something of value, whether already received or just promised. Conspiring to do this is also a crime. The punishment depends on the outcome. If no injury results, the punishment is a fine, up to ten years in prison, or both. If personal injury results, the punishment rises to a fine, up to twenty years, or both. If death results, the punishment is death, life imprisonment, or a fine of up to $250,000, or both a fine and imprisonment. (b) This subsection defines three terms used in this section and in section 1959. "Anything of pecuniary value" means money, a negotiable instrument, a business interest, or anything else whose main significance is economic gain. "Facility of interstate or foreign commerce" includes methods of transportation and communication. "State" includes any U.S. state, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States.

facts

- Located at 18 U.S.C. § 1958, titled "Use of interstate commerce facilities in the commission of murder-for-hire." - Enacted by Pub. L. 98–473, § 1002(a), on October 12, 1984 (originally codified as § 1952A, later renumbered § 1958). - The provision comprises 220 words across two subsections, (a) and (b). - Source credit reflects six subsequent amendments, most recently by Pub. L. 108–458, § 6704, enacted December 17, 2004.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)

Whoever travels in or causes another (including the intended victim) to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or uses or causes another (including the intended victim) to use the mail or any facility of interstate or foreign commerce, with intent that a murder be committed in violation of the laws of any State or the United States as consideration for the receipt of, or as consideration for a promise or agreement to pay, anything of pecuniary value, or who conspires to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than ten years, or both; and if personal injury results, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than twenty years, or both; and if death results, shall be punished by death or life imprisonment, or shall be fined not more than $250,000, or both.

(b)

As used in this section and section 1959

(1)

“anything of pecuniary value” means anything of value in the form of money, a negotiable instrument, a commercial interest, or anything else the primary significance of which is economic advantage;

(2)

“facility of interstate or foreign commerce” includes means of transportation and communication; and

(3)

“State” includes a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 1002(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2136, § 1952A; renumbered § 1958 and amended Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §§ 7053(a), 7058(b), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4402, 4403; Pub. L. 101–647, title XII, § 1205(k), title XXXV, § 3558, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4831, 4927; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60003(a)(11), title XIV, § 140007(b), title XXXII, § 320105, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), (N), (Q), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1969, 2033, 2111, 2147, 2148; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§ 601(g)(3), 605(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3500, 3509; Pub. L. 108–458, title VI, § 6704, Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3766.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1984Enacted · Pub. L. 98-473 · 98 Stat. 2136
  • 1988Amended · Pub. L. 100-690 · 102 Stat. 4402, 4403
  • 1990Amended · Pub. L. 101-647 · 104 Stat. 4831, 4927
  • 1994Amended · Pub. L. 103-322 · 108 Stat. 1969, 2033, 2111, 2147, 2148
  • 1996Amended · Pub. L. 104-294 · 110 Stat. 3500, 3509
  • 2004Amended · Pub. L. 108-458 · 118 Stat. 3766
The record shows that this section was added by Public Law 98–473, title II, § 1002(a), enacted October 12, 1984, and originally codified as 18 U.S.C. § 1952A. The source credit indicates it was renumbered as § 1958 and amended by Public Law 100–690 in 1988, and subsequently amended by Public Law 101–647 (1990), Public Law 103–322 (1994), Public Law 104–294 (1996), and Public Law 108–458 (2004). The source credit lists six amendment actions in total, spanning two decades, though it does not itself describe the substance of each change. Public Law 98–473 is the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, a broad federal crime bill enacted during a period of heightened congressional attention to organized crime, drug trafficking, and violent crime more generally. The Act is generally understood to have expanded federal criminal jurisdiction in several areas, including sentencing reform and new substantive offenses. The creation of a federal murder-for-hire offense tied to use of interstate commerce facilities is commonly understood to reflect a legislative judgment that contract killings arranged across state lines, or by means of interstate communication or travel, warranted a specific federal criminal remedy rather than reliance solely on state homicide law. Beyond this general understanding of the 1984 Act's era and purpose, the record does not establish the specific legislative intent behind this particular section, nor does it document the reasons for each subsequent amendment listed in the source credit.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case