ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

33 U.S.C. § 2803Comprehensive Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Program

submitted 34 years ago by Pub. L. 92-532 to r/title-33-NAVIGATION-AND-NAVIGABLE-WATERS · 1,744 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Administrator and Under Secretary must jointly run a long-term program to collect and analyze data about the environmental quality of coastal ecosystems. The section sets monitoring elements, guidelines, intensive monitoring areas and programs, funding conditions, and an implementation strategy.

(a) The Administrator and Under Secretary, with other Federal, State, and local authorities, must jointly develop and implement a program for long-term collection, assimilation, and analysis of scientific data measuring the Nation’s coastal-ecosystem quality. Monitoring must be coordinated with relevant programs. EPA monitoring leadership must be at the Environmental Research Laboratory in Narragansett, Rhode Island. (b) The program must include: (1) identifying and analyzing coastal environmental quality, including (A) ambient water quality and contaminant levels compared with Federal Water Pollution Control Act criteria and standards, (B) benthic quality and sediment contaminants compared with those criteria and standards, and (C) living-resource health and quality; (2) identifying sources of degradation; (3) assessing the impact of governmental programs, management strategies, and measures designed to reduce or prevent degradation; (4) assessing floatable accumulation along shorelines; (5) analyzing expected short- and long-term quality trends; and (6) developing and implementing intensive programs under (d). (c)(1) Within 18 months after October 29, 1992, the two officials must issue joint monitoring guidelines. They must provide appropriate uniformity while preserving flexibility; scientifically valid methods to simplify surveys and assess water and ecological health, measure the seriousness of existing or expected selected-water problems, identify and measure pollution sources including point and nonpoint sources, and assess over time the effectiveness of pollution reduction; compatible data storage and sharing; and physical, chemical, and biological health indicators. (2) The guidelines must include protocols for statistically valid monitoring networks and surveys including floatables, sampling and analysis of physical, chemical, living-resource, and sediment factors, and quality control, assessment, consistency, and management. (3) The officials must periodically review effectiveness, continued usefulness, uniformity, local-condition treatment, and the need for new or changed guidelines. (4) EPA or a State permitting authority must ensure permit compliance monitoring for coastal discharges under section 402(a)(2) is consistent with the guidelines. Needed permit changes are minor modifications. This does not require monitoring beyond permit compliance monitoring. (d)(1) The program must include intensive programs developed here. (2) Within 24 months after October 29, 1992, and periodically later, the officials must jointly designate areas for intensive monitoring based on National Research Council recommendations. (3)(A) They must contract with the Council to identify suitable areas, considering representative ecosystems, nationwide status and trends, and local management needs. (B) The Council must consult Regional Research Boards under title IV of the Act. (C) Within 18 months, it must report suitable areas. (D) With other authorities, the officials must develop and implement multiyear programs for Massachusetts and Cape Cod Bays, the Gulf of Maine, Chesapeake Bay, the Hudson-Raritan Estuary, and each jointly designated area. (4) Each program must identify conditions and problems; state goals and their relationship to coastal-water objectives; identify water and biological parameters and their relationship to goals; describe networks, surveys, and activities using the guidelines when appropriate; survey existing Federal, State, and local coastal monitoring activities and private compliance-monitoring activities in or on the covered coastal waters, describe how the program relates to those other activities, and integrate them when appropriate; describe data management and quality control; state implementation requirements including lead authority, public and private implementers, schedule, Federal and State responsibilities, and needed program changes; estimate Federal, State, and participant costs; and describe periodic success assessments and possible modifications. (5) The Massachusetts and Cape Cod Bays program must additionally establish baseline environmental data, including bacterial quantity, indigenous-species quality, and swimmability, and determine ecological effects of major point-source discharges. (6) Before implementation, the officials must enter a Memorandum of Understanding, which may include other Federal agencies, identifying monitoring and reporting duties and encouraging coordination. (7)(A) The officials and each affected State Governor must ensure compliance. (B) They may provide financial assistance through cooperative agreements to non-Federal agencies and institutions, but Federal assistance requires at least 50 percent of their monitoring cost from non-Federal funds. (e)(1) Within one year after October 29, 1992, the officials must jointly submit to Congress a Comprehensive Implementation Strategy identifying current and planned implementation activities. (2) They must consult the National Academy of Sciences; Fish and Wildlife Service, Minerals Management Service, Coast Guard, Navy, and Agriculture officials; other relevant Federal or regional agencies; and coastal-State Governors. (3) At least three months before submission, they must publish a draft in the Federal Register and seek public comments. (4) Within one year after submitting the Strategy, they must enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with appropriate agencies to coordinate Federal coastal monitoring, identifying duties and encouraging coordination where possible.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Authority; joint implementation
(1)

The Administrator and the Under Secretary, in conjunction with other Federal, State, and local authorities, shall jointly develop and implement a program for the long-term collection, assimilation, and analysis of scientific data designed to measure the environmental quality of the Nation’s coastal ecosystems pursuant to this section. Monitoring conducted pursuant to this section shall be coordinated with relevant monitoring programs conducted by the Administrator, Under Secretary, and other Federal, State, and local authorities.

(2)

Primary leadership for the monitoring program activities conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to this section shall be located at the Environmental Research Laboratory in Narragansett, Rhode Island.

(b) Program elements

The Comprehensive Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Program shall include, but not be limited to—

(1)

identification and analysis of the status of environmental quality in the Nation’s coastal ecosystems, including but not limited to, assessment of—

(A)

ambient water quality, including contaminant levels in relation to criteria and standards issued pursuant to title III or 1 the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1311 et seq.);

(B)

benthic environmental quality, including analysis of contaminant levels in sediments in relation to criteria and standards issued pursuant to title III of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1311 et seq.); and

(C)

health and quality of living resources.2

(2)

identification of sources of environmental degradation affecting the Nation’s coastal ecosystems;

(3)

assessment of the impact of governmental programs and management strategies and measures designed to abate or prevent the environmental degradation of the Nation’s coastal ecosystems;

(4)

assessment of the accumulation of floatables along coastal shorelines;

(5)

analysis of expected short-term and long-term trends in the environmental quality of the Nation’s coastal ecosystems; and

(6)

the development and implementation of intensive coastal water quality monitoring programs in accordance with subsection (d).

(c) Monitoring guidelines and protocols
(1) Guidelines

Not later than 18 months after October 29, 1992, the Administrator and the Under Secretary shall jointly issue coastal water quality monitoring guidelines to assist in the development and implementation of coastal water quality monitoring programs. The guidelines shall—

(A)

provide an appropriate degree of uniformity among the coastal water quality monitoring methods and data while preserving the flexibility of monitoring programs to address specific needs;

(B)

establish scientifically valid monitoring methods that will—

(i)

provide simplified methods to survey and assess the water quality and ecological health of coastal waters;

(ii)

identify and quantify through more intensive efforts the severity of existing or anticipated problems in selected coastal waters;

(iii)

identify and quantify sources of pollution that cause or contribute to those problems, including point and nonpoint sources; and

(iv)

evaluate over time the effectiveness of efforts to reduce or eliminate pollution from those sources;

(C)

provide for data compatibility to enable data to be efficiently stored and shared by various users; and

(D)

identify appropriate physical, chemical, and biological indicators of the health and quality of coastal ecosystems.

(2) Technical protocols

Guidelines issued under paragraph (1) shall include protocols for—

(A)

designing statistically valid coastal water quality monitoring networks and monitoring surveys, including assessment of the accumulation of floatables.2

(B)

sampling and analysis, including appropriate physical and chemical parameters, living resource parameters, and sediment analysis techniques; and

(C)

quality control, quality assessment, and data consistency and management.

(3) Periodic review

The Administrator and the Under Secretary shall periodically review the guidelines and protocols issued under this subsection to evaluate their effectiveness, the degree to which they continue to answer program objectives and provide an appropriate degree of uniformity while taking local conditions into account, and any need to modify or supplement them with new guidelines and protocols, as needed.

(4) Discharge permit data

The Administrator or a State permitting authority shall ensure that compliance monitoring conducted pursuant to section 402(a)(2) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1342(a)(2)) for permits for discharges to coastal waters is consistent with the guidelines issued under this subsection. Any modifications of discharge permits necessary to implement this subsection shall be deemed to be minor modifications of such permit. Nothing in this subsection requires dischargers to conduct monitoring other than compliance monitoring pursuant to permits under section 402(a)(2) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1342(a)(2)).

(d) Intensive coastal water quality monitoring programs
(1) In general

The Comprehensive Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Program established pursuant to this section shall include intensive coastal water quality monitoring programs developed under this subsection.

(2) Designation of intensive monitoring areas

Not later than 24 months after October 29, 1992, and periodically thereafter, the Administrator and the Under Secretary shall, based on recommendations by the National Research Council, jointly designate coastal areas to be intensively monitored.

(3) Identification of suitable coastal areas
(A)

The Administrator and the Under Secretary shall contract with the National Research Council to conduct a study to identify coastal areas suitable for the establishment of intensive coastal monitoring programs. In identifying these coastal areas, the National Research Council shall consider areas that—

(i)

are representatives of coastal ecosystems throughout the United States;

(ii)

will provide information to assess the status and trends of coastal water quality nation-wide; and

(iii)

would benefit from intensive water quality monitoring because of local management needs.

(B)

In making recommendations under this paragraph, the National Research Council shall consult with Regional Research Boards established pursuant to title IV of this Act [16 U.S.C. 1447 et seq.].

(C)

The National Research Council shall, within 18 months of October 29, 1992, submit a report to the Administrator and the Under Secretary listing areas suitable for intensive monitoring.

(D)

The Administrator and the Under Secretary, in conjunction with other Federal, State, and local authorities, shall develop and implement multi-year programs of intensive monitoring for Massachusetts and Cape Cod Bays, the Gulf of Maine, the Chesapeake Bay, the Hudson-Raritan Estuary, and each area jointly designated by the Administrator and the Under Secretary pursuant to paragraph (2).

(4) Intensive coastal water quality monitoring programs

Each intensive coastal water quality monitoring program developed pursuant to this subsection shall—

(A)

identify water quality conditions and problems and provide information to assist in improving coastal water quality;

(B)

clearly state the goals and objectives of the monitoring program and their relationship to the water quality objectives for coastal waters covered by the program;

(C)

identify the water quality and biological parameters of the monitoring program and their relationship to these goals and objectives;

(D)

describe the types of monitoring networks, surveys and other activities to be used to achieve these goals and objectives, using where appropriate the guidelines issued under subsection (c);

(E)

survey existing Federal, State, and local coastal monitoring activities and private compliance monitoring activities in or on the coastal waters covered by the program, describe the relationship of the program to those other monitoring activities, and integrate them, as appropriate, into the intensive monitoring program;

(F)

describe the data management and quality control components of the program;

(G)

specify the implementation requirements for the program, including—

(i)

the lead Federal, State, or regional authority that will administer the program;

(ii)

the public and private parties that will implement the program;

(iii)

a detailed schedule for program implementation;

(iv)

all Federal and State responsibilities for implementing the program; and

(v)

the changes in Federal, State, and local monitoring programs necessary to implement the program;

(H)

estimate the costs to Federal and State governments, and other participants, of implementing the monitoring program; and

(I)

describe the methods to assess periodically the success of the monitoring program in meeting its goals and objectives, and the manner in which the program may be modified from time-to-time.

(5) Criteria for monitoring Massachusetts and Cape Cod Bays

In addition to the criteria listed in paragraph (4), the intensive monitoring program for Massachusetts and Cape Cod Bays shall establish baseline data on environmental phenomena (such as quantity of bacteria and quality of indigenous species, and swimmability) and determine the ecological impacts resulting from major point source discharges.

(6) Memorandum of Understanding

Prior to implementing any intensive coastal water quality monitoring program under this subsection, the Administrator and the Under Secretary shall enter into a Memorandum of Understanding to implement the intensive coastal water quality monitoring programs and may extend the memorandum 3 of Understanding to include other appropriate Federal agencies. The Memorandum of Understanding shall identify the monitoring and reporting responsibilities of each agency and shall encourage the coordination of monitoring activities.

(7) Implementation
(A)

The Administrator, the Under Secretary, and the Governor of each State having waters subject to an intensive coastal water quality monitoring program developed pursuant to this subsection shall ensure compliance with that program.

(B)

The Administrator and the Under Secretary are authorized to enter into cooperative agreements to provide financial assistance to non-Federal agencies and institutions to support implementation of intensive monitoring programs under this subsection. Federal financial assistance may only be provided on the condition that not less than fifty percent of the costs of the monitoring to be conducted by a non-Federal agency or institution is provided from non-Federal funds.

(e) Comprehensive Implementation Strategy
(1) In general

Within 1 year after October 29, 1992, the Administrator and the Under Secretary shall jointly submit to Congress a Comprehensive Implementation Strategy identifying the current and planned activities to implement the Comprehensive Coastal Monitoring Program pursuant to this section.

(2) Consultation

The Administrator and the Under Secretary shall consult with the National Academy of Sciences, the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the Director of the Minerals Management Service, the Commandant of the Coast Guard, the Secretary of the Navy, the Secretary of Agriculture, the heads of any other relevant Federal or regional agencies, and the Governors of coastal States in developing the Strategy.

(3) Public comment

Not less than 3 months before submitting the Strategy to Congress, the Administrator and the Under Secretary shall jointly publish a draft version of the Strategy in the Federal Register and shall solicit public comments regarding the Strategy.

(4) Memorandum of Understanding

Within 1 year after submission of the Strategy under paragraph (1), the Administrator and the Under Secretary shall enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with appropriate Federal agencies necessary to effect the coordination of Federal coastal monitoring programs. The Memorandum of Understanding shall identify the monitoring and reporting responsibilities of each agency and shall encourage the coordination of monitoring activities where possible.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 92–532, title V, § 503, as added Pub. L. 102–567, title V, § 501, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4294.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1992Enacted · Pub. L. 92-532 · 106 Stat. 4294

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 92-532 on 1992-10-29.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case