ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

35 U.S.C. § 119Benefit of earlier filing date; right of priority

submitted 74 years ago by ch. 950 to r/title-35-PATENTS · 1,069 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A U.S. patent application can use the filing date of an earlier foreign application for the same invention. The U.S. filing must happen within 12 months of the foreign filing, with limited extensions. Similar priority rules apply to provisional applications, inventors' certificates, and plant breeder's rights.

(a) If a person (or their legal representative or assignee) first files a patent application for an invention in a foreign country, and later files for the same invention in the United States, the U.S. application gets treated as if it were filed on that earlier foreign filing date. This only works if the foreign country gives the same right to U.S. applicants or citizens, or is a WTO member country, and if the U.S. application is filed within 12 months of the foreign filing. The Director may allow this 12-month window to be extended by 2 more months, if a fee is paid and the delay in filing was unintentional. (b) (1) To get this right of priority, the applicant must file a claim identifying the foreign application's number, the country or authority it was filed in, and its filing date, within whatever time the Director requires during the application's pendency. (2) If the applicant misses that deadline, the Director may treat it as giving up the priority claim — but the Director may also set up a process, requiring a fee, to accept a claim that was unintentionally filed late. (3) The Director may also require a certified copy of the original foreign application, its specification and drawings, a translation if it isn't in English, and other information, all certified by the foreign patent authority and showing the filing dates involved. (c) The same priority right can instead be based on a later foreign application in the same country, rather than the first one filed — but only if the earlier foreign application was withdrawn, abandoned, or otherwise dropped before being made public, without leaving any rights outstanding, and was never used (before or since) as the basis for a priority claim. (d) If a foreign country lets applicants choose between filing for a patent or for an "inventor's certificate," an application for an inventor's certificate gets the same priority treatment as a patent application, under the same conditions — but only if the applicant qualifies for the benefits of the Stockholm Revision of the Paris Convention at the time of filing. (e) (1) A U.S. nonprovisional application (filed under section 111(a) or as an international application under section 363) gets the filing date of an earlier U.S. provisional application for the same invention, as long as the invention was properly disclosed in that provisional application, the inventors match, the nonprovisional is filed within 12 months of the provisional, and it contains (or is amended to contain) a specific reference to the provisional. As with foreign priority, the Director may allow a 2-month extension for unintentional delay, with a fee, and may accept a late-added reference to the provisional application if the delay in adding it was unintentional — otherwise, missing the deadline can mean losing this benefit. (2) A provisional application can't be relied on in any Patent and Trademark Office proceeding unless its filing fee has been paid. (3) If the 12-month deadline for a provisional application falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or D.C. federal holiday, it's pushed to the next business day. For international applications filed under section 363 somewhere other than the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the 12-month and 2-month periods are instead extended as the applicable treaty and its regulations provide. (f) Applications for plant breeder's rights filed in a WTO member country, or in a foreign country party to the UPOV Convention, get the same priority treatment described in subsections (a) through (c) as patent applications, under the same conditions. (g) Definitions: "WTO member country" has the meaning given in section 104(b)(2). "UPOV Contracting Party" means a member of the International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)

An application for patent for an invention filed in this country by any person who has, or whose legal representatives or assigns have, previously regularly filed an application for a patent for the same invention in a foreign country which affords similar privileges in the case of applications filed in the United States or to citizens of the United States, or in a WTO member country, shall have the same effect as the same application would have if filed in this country on the date on which the application for patent for the same invention was first filed in such foreign country, if the application in this country is filed within 12 months from the earliest date on which such foreign application was filed. The Director may prescribe regulations, including the requirement for payment of the fee specified in section 41(a)(7), pursuant to which the 12-month period set forth in this subsection may be extended by an additional 2 months if the delay in filing the application in this country within the 12-month period was unintentional.

(b)
(1)

No application for patent shall be entitled to this right of priority unless a claim is filed in the Patent and Trademark Office, identifying the foreign application by specifying the application number on that foreign application, the intellectual property authority or country in or for which the application was filed, and the date of filing the application, at such time during the pendency of the application as required by the Director.

(2)

The Director may consider the failure of the applicant to file a timely claim for priority as a waiver of any such claim. The Director may establish procedures, including the requirement for payment of the fee specified in section 41(a)(7), to accept an unintentionally delayed claim under this section.

(3)

The Director may require a certified copy of the original foreign application, specification, and drawings upon which it is based, a translation if not in the English language, and such other information as the Director considers necessary. Any such certification shall be made by the foreign intellectual property authority in which the foreign application was filed and show the date of the application and of the filing of the specification and other papers.

(c)

In like manner and subject to the same conditions and requirements, the right provided in this section may be based upon a subsequent regularly filed application in the same foreign country instead of the first filed foreign application, provided that any foreign application filed prior to such subsequent application has been withdrawn, abandoned, or otherwise disposed of, without having been laid open to public inspection and without leaving any rights outstanding, and has not served, nor thereafter shall serve, as a basis for claiming a right of priority.

(d)

Applications for inventors’ certificates filed in a foreign country in which applicants have a right to apply, at their discretion, either for a patent or for an inventor’s certificate shall be treated in this country in the same manner and have the same effect for purpose of the right of priority under this section as applications for patents, subject to the same conditions and requirements of this section as apply to applications for patents, provided such applicants are entitled to the benefits of the Stockholm Revision of the Paris Convention at the time of such filing.

(e)
(1)

An application for patent filed under section 111(a) or section 363 for an invention disclosed in the manner provided by section 112(a) (other than the requirement to disclose the best mode) in a provisional application filed under section 111(b), by an inventor or inventors named in the provisional application, shall have the same effect, as to such invention, as though filed on the date of the provisional application filed under section 111(b), if the application for patent filed under section 111(a) or section 363 is filed not later than 12 months after the date on which the provisional application was filed and if it contains or is amended to contain a specific reference to the provisional application. The Director may prescribe regulations, including the requirement for payment of the fee specified in section 41(a)(7), pursuant to which the 12-month period set forth in this subsection may be extended by an additional 2 months if the delay in filing the application under section 111(a) or section 363 within the 12-month period was unintentional. No application shall be entitled to the benefit of an earlier filed provisional application under this subsection unless an amendment containing the specific reference to the earlier filed provisional application is submitted at such time during the pendency of the application as required by the Director. The Director may consider the failure to submit such an amendment within that time period as a waiver of any benefit under this subsection. The Director may establish procedures, including the payment of the fee specified in section 41(a)(7), to accept an unintentionally delayed submission of an amendment under this subsection.

(2)

A provisional application filed under section 111(b) may not be relied upon in any proceeding in the Patent and Trademark Office unless the fee set forth in subparagraph (A) or (C) of section 41(a)(1) has been paid.

(3)

If the day that is 12 months after the filing date of a provisional application falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday within the District of Columbia, the period of pendency of the provisional application shall be extended to the next succeeding secular or business day. For an application for patent filed under section 363 in a Receiving Office other than the Patent and Trademark Office, the 12-month and additional 2-month period set forth in this subsection shall be extended as provided under the treaty and Regulations as defined in section 351.

(f)

Applications for plant breeder’s rights filed in a WTO member country (or in a foreign UPOV Contracting Party) shall have the same effect for the purpose of the right of priority under subsections (a) through (c) of this section as applications for patents, subject to the same conditions and requirements of this section as apply to applications for patents.

(g)

As used in this section—

(1)

the term “WTO member country” has the same meaning as the term is defined in section 104(b)(2); and

(2)

the term “UPOV Contracting Party” means a member of the International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants.

Source credit: (July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 800; Pub. L. 87–333, § 1, Oct. 3, 1961, 75 Stat. 748; Pub. L. 92–358, § 1, July 28, 1972, 86 Stat. 501; Pub. L. 93–596, § 1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949; Pub. L. 103–465, title V, § 532(b)(1), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4985; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §§ 4503(a), (b)(2), 4801(b), (c), 4802], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–563, 1501A–564, 1501A–588, 1501A–589; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13206(b)(2), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1906; Pub. L. 112–29, §§ 3(g)(6), 15(b), 20(j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 288, 328, 335; Pub. L. 112–211, title II, §§ 201(c)(1), 202(b)(2), Dec. 18, 2012, 126 Stat. 1534, 1536.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1952Enacted · Act of July 19, 1952, ch. 950 · 66 Stat. 800
  • 1961Amended · Pub. L. 87-333 · 75 Stat. 748
  • 1972Amended · Pub. L. 92-358 · 86 Stat. 501
  • 1975Amended · Pub. L. 93-596 · 88 Stat. 1949
  • 1994Amended · Pub. L. 103-465 · 108 Stat. 4985
  • 1999Amended · Pub. L. 106-113 · 113 Stat. 1536, 1501
  • 2002Amended · Pub. L. 107-273 · 116 Stat. 1906
  • 2011Amended · Pub. L. 112-29 · 125 Stat. 288, 328, 335
  • 2012Amended · Pub. L. 112-211 · 126 Stat. 1534, 1536

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 950 on 1952-07-19.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case