42 U.S.C. § 289a — Peer review requirements
submitted 82 years ago by Pub. L. 99-158 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 388 words · no verdicts yet
NIH grant, contract, and cooperative-agreement applications for biomedical and behavioral research must go through technical and scientific peer review, following rules the Secretary sets, generally keeping the review system and review groups that were already in place as of November 20, 1985. NIH's own in-house research must also go through periodic peer review, with a written description of the research shared with reviewers and results shared with the relevant advisory council. When reviewing clinical research proposals, reviewers must also check whether the proposal follows the separate rules on including women and minorities as subjects, unless that requirement doesn't apply to this particular proposal.
The Secretary*, acting through the Director of NIH*, shall by regulation require appropriate technical and scientific peer review of—
applications made for grants and cooperative agreements under this chapter for biomedical and behavioral research; and
applications made for biomedical and behavioral research and development contracts to be administered through the National Institutes of Health.
Regulations promulgated under paragraph (1) shall require that the review of applications made for grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements required by the regulations be conducted—
to the extent practical, in a manner consistent with the system for technical and scientific peer review applicable on November 20, 1985, to grants under this chapter for biomedical and behavioral research, and
to the extent practical, by technical and scientific peer review groups performing such review on or before November 20, 1985,
and shall authorize such review to be conducted by groups appointed under sections 282(b)(16) and 284(c)(3) of this title.
The Director* of NIH shall establish procedures for periodic technical and scientific peer review of research at the National Institutes of Health. Such procedures shall require that—
the reviewing entity be provided a written description of the research to be reviewed, and
the reviewing entity provide the advisory council of the national research institute* involved with such description and the results of the review by the entity,
and shall authorize such review to be conducted by groups appointed under sections 282(b)(6) 1 and 284(c)(3) of this title.
In technical and scientific peer review under this section of proposals for clinical research, the consideration of any such proposal (including the initial consideration) shall, except as provided in paragraph (2), include an evaluation of the technical and scientific merit of the proposal regarding compliance with section 289a–2 of this title.
Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any proposal for clinical research that, pursuant to subsection (b) of section 289a–2 of this title, is not subject to the requirement of subsection (a) of such section regarding the inclusion of women and members of minority groups as subjects in clinical research.
Source credit: (July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, § 492, as added Pub. L. 99–158, § 2, Nov. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 874; amended Pub. L. 103–43, title I, § 132, June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 135; Pub. L. 109–482, title I, § 102(f)(1)(B), Jan. 15, 2007, 120 Stat. 3685.)
- 1944Enacted · Pub. L. 99-158 · 99 Stat. 874
- 1993Amended · Pub. L. 103-43 · 107 Stat. 135
- 2007Amended · Pub. L. 109-482 · 120 Stat. 3685
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 99-158 on 1944-07-01.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case