ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

7 U.S.C. § 608bMarketing agreements; exemption from anti-trust laws; inspection requirements for handlers not subject to agreements

submitted 93 years ago by ch. 25 to r/title-7-AGRICULTURE · 350 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Secretary of Agriculture may make marketing agreements for certain interstate or foreign commerce in agricultural commodities after notice and a hearing opportunity. Such agreements are lawful under antitrust laws, and special inspection, sale, and penalty rules apply to peanuts handled by people who did not sign an agreement.

(a) To carry out this chapter's policy, after proper notice and an opportunity for a hearing, the Secretary may enter marketing agreements with processors, producers, producer associations, and others handling an agricultural commodity or its product, but only for handling in interstate or foreign commerce or that directly burdens, obstructs, or affects such commerce. Making an agreement is not a violation of United States antitrust laws, and the agreement is lawful. However, it may not remain in force after this chapter ends. (b)(1) If a peanut agreement with the Secretary is in effect, (A) all peanuts handled by people who did not sign it must be inspected to the same extent and in the same way the agreement requires; (B) those peanuts may not be sold or otherwise disposed of for human consumption if they fail the agreement's quality requirements; and (C) every assessment under the agreement, except one indemnifying losses on rejected peanuts, (i) applies also to peanut handlers, as the Secretary defines that term, who did not sign the agreement, and (ii) must be paid to the Secretary. (2) A person who did not sign the agreement and violates this subsection must be assessed a penalty equal to 140 percent of the support price for quota peanuts multiplied by the quantity sold or disposed of in violation of (b)(1)(B), as determined under section 1445c-3 for the marketing year of the crop involved.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)

In order to effectuate the declared policy of this chapter, the Secretary of Agriculture shall have the power, after due notice and opportunity for hearing, to enter into marketing agreements with processors, producers, associations of producers, and others engaged in the handling of any agricultural commodity or product thereof, only with respect to such handling as is in the current of interstate or foreign commerce or which directly burdens, obstructs, or affects, interstate or foreign commerce in such commodity or product thereof. The making of any such agreement shall not be held to be in violation of any of the antitrust laws of the United States, and any such agreement shall be deemed to be lawful: Provided, That no such agreement shall remain in force after the termination of this chapter.

(b)
(1)

If an agreement with the Secretary is in effect with respect to peanuts pursuant to this section—

(A)

all peanuts handled by persons who have not entered into such an agreement with the Secretary shall be subject to inspection to the same extent and manner as is required by such agreement;

(B)

no such peanuts shall be sold or otherwise disposed of for human consumption if such peanuts fail to meet the quality requirements of such agreement; and

(C)

any assessment (except with respect to any assessment for the indemnification of losses on rejected peanuts) imposed under the agreement shall—

(i)

apply to peanut handlers (as defined by the Secretary) who have not entered into such an agreement with the Secretary in addition to those handlers who have entered into the agreement; and

(ii)

be paid to the Secretary.

(2)

Violation of this subsection by a person who has not entered into such an agreement shall result in the assessment by the Secretary of a penalty equal to 140 percent of the support price for quota peanuts multiplied by the quantity of peanuts sold or disposed of in violation of subsection (b)(1)(B), as determined under section 1445c–3 1 of this title, for the marketing year for the crop with respect to which such violation occurs.

Source credit: (May 12, 1933, ch. 25, title I, § 8b, formerly § 8(2), 48 Stat. 34; Apr. 7, 1934, ch. 103, § 7, 48 Stat. 528; renumbered and amended Aug. 24, 1935, ch. 641, § 4, 49 Stat. 753; June 3, 1937, ch. 296, § 1, 50 Stat. 246; June 30, 1947, ch. 166, title II, § 206(d), 61 Stat. 208; Pub. L. 101–220, § 4, Dec. 12, 1989, 103 Stat. 1878; Pub. L. 102–237, title I, § 115(1), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1840; Pub. L. 103–66, title I, § 1109(b), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 326.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1933Enacted · Act of May 12, 1933, ch. 25 · 48 Stat. 34
  • 1934Amended · Act of Apr. 7, 1934, ch. 103 · 48 Stat. 528
  • 1935Amended · Act of Aug. 24, 1935, ch. 641 · 49 Stat. 753
  • 1937Amended · Act of June 3, 1937, ch. 296 · 50 Stat. 246
  • 1947Amended · Act of June 30, 1947, ch. 166 · 61 Stat. 208
  • 1989Amended · Pub. L. 101-220 · 103 Stat. 1878
  • 1991Amended · Pub. L. 102-237 · 105 Stat. 1840
  • 1993Amended · Pub. L. 103-66 · 107 Stat. 326

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 25 on 1933-05-12.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case