ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

10 U.S.C. § 118Materiel readiness metrics and materiel readiness objectives for major weapon systems

submitted 7 years ago by Pub. L. 116-92 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 677 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law requires the Defense Department to track how ready its major weapon systems are. Each department head must create metrics measuring availability, capability, and reliability of weapons. The Secretary of Defense and a cost office must also report yearly on readiness gaps and funding.

(a) Materiel Readiness Metrics. Each head of a Department element listed in section 111(b)(1)-(10) must create and maintain metrics for how ready the military's equipment is. These metrics must let the Department check whether service members can carry out the strategic framework required by section 113(g)(1)(B)(vii), and follow the guidance the Secretary of Defense issues under section 113(g)(1)(B). (b) Required Metrics. At minimum, these metrics must include a set procedure and a way of calculating four things for each major weapon system - broken down by mission, design series, variant, or class: materiel availability, operational availability, operational capability, and materiel reliability. (c) Materiel Readiness Objectives. Within one year of this subsection becoming law, each element head described in (a) must set materiel readiness objectives - target levels - for each major weapon system. Each year after that, they must review and update these objectives, and include any changes in the materials sent to Congress supporting the President's budget under section 1105 of title 31. (d) Budget Justification. Within five days of the Secretary of Defense sending Congress the President's budget materials, the Secretary must send the House and Senate defense committees an annual report on major weapons systems sustainment covering the future years defense program under section 221. This report must include: an assessment of materiel availability, operational availability, and materiel reliability for each major weapon system; and a detailed explanation of anything - like infrastructure, workforce, or supply chain issues - that could stop the Department or a military department from meeting its readiness objectives. (e) Funding Estimates. Within the same five-day window, the Director of Cost Assessment and Performance Evaluation must send the defense committees a full estimate of the funds needed to meet the readiness objectives from (c), covering the future-years defense program. For each major weapon system, by mission, design, variant, or class, this estimate must show: funds already obligated in operation and maintenance accounts for the second fiscal year before the budget year; funds the Director expects will be obligated in those accounts by the end of the year before the budget year; and funds budgeted and planned across the future years defense program in those accounts. (f) Definitions. "Major weapon system" has the meaning from section 101(a). "Materiel availability" means the percentage of a weapon system's total inventory that can currently perform its assigned mission. "Materiel readiness objective" means the minimum availability level needed to meet the strategic framework and guidance from subsection (a). "Materiel reliability" means the probability a weapon system will work without failing over a set period. "Operational availability" means the percentage of time a weapon system is capable of operating. "Operationally capable" means the system can perform its mission and has no problems with any of its subsystems.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Materiel Readiness Metrics.—

Each head of an element of the Department specified in paragraphs (1) through (10) of section 111(b) of this title shall establish and maintain materiel readiness metrics to enable assessment of the readiness of members of the armed forces to carry out—

(1)

the strategic framework required by section 113(g)(1)(B)(vii) 1 of this title; and

(2)

guidance issued by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to section 113(g)(1)(B) of this title.

(b)Required Metrics.—

At a minimum, the materiel readiness metrics required by subsection (a) shall establish procedures and a computation methodology to determine the materiel availability, operational availability, operational capability, and materiel reliability of each major weapon system by designated mission, design series, variant, or class.

(c)Materiel Readiness Objectives.—
(1)

Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this subsection, each head of an element described in subsection (a) shall establish materiel readiness objectives for each major weapon system.

(2)

Annually, each head of an element described in subsection (a) shall review and revise such materiel readiness objectives and include any such revisions in the materials submitted to Congress in support of the budget of the President under section 1105 of title 31.

(d)Budget Justification.—

Not later than five days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress the materials in support of the budget of the President for a fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an annual report on major weapons systems sustainment for the period covered by the future years defense program specified by section 221 of this title. Such report shall include—

(1)

an assessment of the materiel availability, operational availability, and materiel reliability for each major weapon system; and

(2)

a detailed explanation of any factors that could preclude the Department of Defense or any of the military departments from meeting applicable materiel readiness objectives, such as infrastructure, workforce, or supply chain considerations.

(e)Funding Estimates.—

Not later than five days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress the materials in support of the budget of the President for a fiscal year, the Director of Cost Assessment and Performance Evaluation shall submit to the congressional defense committees a comprehensive estimate of the funds necessary to meet the materiel readiness objectives required by subsection (c) through the period covered by the most recent future-years defense program. At a minimum, the Director shall provide, for each major weapon system, by designated mission, design series, variant, or class, a comprehensive estimate of the funds necessary to meet such objectives that—

(1)

have been obligated by subactivity group within the operation and maintenance accounts for the second fiscal year preceding the budget year;

(2)

the Director estimates will have been obligated by subactivity group within the operation and maintenance accounts by the end of the fiscal year preceding the budget year; and

(3)

have been budgeted and programmed across the future years defense program within the operation and maintenance accounts by subactivity group.

(f)Definitions.—

In this section:

(1)

The term “major weapon system” has the meaning given in section 101(a) of this title.

(2)

The term “materiel availability” means a measure of the percentage of the total inventory of a major weapon system that is operationally capable of performing an assigned mission.

(3)

The term “materiel readiness objective” means the minimum required availability of each covered system that is necessary to fulfill the requirements of the strategic framework and guidance referred to in subsection (a).

(4)

The term “materiel reliability” means the probability that a major weapon system will perform without failure over a specified interval.

(5)

The term “operational availability” means a measure of the percentage of time a major weapon system is operationally capable.

(6)

The term “operationally capable” means a materiel condition indicating that a major weapon system is capable of performing its assigned mission and has no discrepancies with a subsystem of a major weapon system.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title III, § 351(a)(1), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1319; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title III, § 347(a), title X, § 1081(a)(6), title XVIII, § 1883(b)(2), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3540, 3871, 4294; Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title III, § 351(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2532; Pub. L. 119–60, div. A, title VIII, § 811(c)(2)(A), title XVIII, § 1803(d), Dec. 18, 2025, 139 Stat. 950, 1233.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2019Enacted · Pub. L. 116-92 · 133 Stat. 1319
  • 2021Amended · Pub. L. 116-283 · 134 Stat. 3540, 3871, 4294
  • 2022Amended · Pub. L. 117-263 · 136 Stat. 2532
  • 2025Amended · Pub. L. 119-60 · 139 Stat. 950, 1233

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 116-92 on 2019-12-20.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case