ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

10 U.S.C. § 189Communications Security Review and Advisory Board

submitted 13 years ago by Pub. L. 113-66 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 332 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law creates a Defense Department board to review the military's communications security. The Board tracks cryptographic upgrades, spots risks, and advises the Secretary of Defense. It does not review programs funded by the National Intelligence Program.

(a) Establishment: The Department of Defense must have a Communications Security Review and Advisory Board ("the Board") to review and assess the Department's communications security, cryptographic modernization, and related key-management work, and to advise the Secretary about it. (b) Members: (1) The Secretary decides how many members the Board has. (2) The Department's Chief Information Officer chairs the Board. (3) The Secretary appoints officers in the grade of general or admiral, and senior civilian employees, to serve as members. (c) Responsibilities: The Board must — (1) monitor the Department's overall communications security, cryptographic modernization, and key-management work, including on major defense acquisition programs (as defined in 10 U.S.C. § 4201), by (A) requiring each military department's Chief Information Officer to report their communications security work to the Board, (B) tracking each military department's compliance with communications security modernization, and (C) validating lifecycle communications security modernization plans for major defense acquisition programs; (2) confirm the need to replace cryptographic equipment based on its expiration date, and weigh the risks of using it past that date; (3) hold in-depth program reviews for specific cryptographic modernization projects, to check requirements and spot risks; (4) build a long-term communications security roadmap to catch potential issues early and keep it in sync with major planning documents; and (5) advise the Secretary on the Department's cryptographic posture, including budget recommendations. (d) Exclusion of Certain Programs: The Board does not review programs funded under the National Intelligence Program, as defined in the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. § 3003(6)).
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Establishment.—

There shall be in the Department of Defense a Communications Security Review and Advisory Board (in this section referred to as the “Board”) to review and assess the communications security, cryptographic modernization, and related key management activities of the Department and provide advice to the Secretary with respect to such activities.

(b)Members.—
(1)

The Secretary shall determine the number of members of the Board.

(2)

The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall serve as chairman of the Board.

(3)

The Secretary shall appoint officers in the grade of general or admiral and civilian employees of the Department of Defense in the Senior Executive Service to serve as members of the Board.

(c)Responsibilities.—

The Board shall—

(1)

monitor the overall communications security, cryptographic modernization, and key management efforts of the Department, including activities under major defense acquisition programs (as defined in section 4201 of this title), by—

(A)

requiring each Chief Information Officer of each military department to report the communications security activities of the military department to the Board;

(B)

tracking compliance of each military department with respect to communications security modernization efforts;

(C)

validating lifecycle communications security modernization plans for major defense acquisition programs;

(2)

validate the need to replace cryptographic equipment based on the expiration dates of the equipment and evaluate the risks of continuing to use cryptographic equipment after such expiration dates;

(3)

convene in-depth program reviews for specific cryptographic modernization developments with respect to validating requirements and identifying programmatic risks;

(4)

develop a long-term roadmap for communications security to identify potential issues and ensure synchronization with major planning documents; and

(5)

advise the Secretary on the cryptographic posture of the Department, including budgetary recommendations.

(d)Exclusion of Certain Programs.—

The Board shall not include the consideration of programs funded under the National Intelligence Program (as defined in section 3(6) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(6))) in carrying out this section.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title II, § 261(a), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 724; amended Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, § 1071(f)(4), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3510; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1846(i)(2), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4252.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2013Enacted · Pub. L. 113-66 · 127 Stat. 724
  • 2014Amended · Pub. L. 113-291 · 128 Stat. 3510
  • 2021Amended · Pub. L. 116-283 · 134 Stat. 4252

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 113-66 on 2013-12-26.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case