10 U.S.C. § 2101 — Definitions
submitted 62 years ago by Pub. L. 88-647 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 178 words · no verdicts yet
This section defines “program,” “member of the program,” and “advanced training” for Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps programs.
In this chapter:
The term “program” means the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps of an armed force.
The term “member of the program” means a student who is enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps of an armed force.
The term “advanced training” means the training and instruction offered in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps to students enrolled in an advanced education program beyond the baccalaureate degree level or to students in the third and fourth years of a four-year Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps course, or the equivalent period of training in an approved two-year Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps course (except that, in the case of a student enrolled in an academic program which has been approved by the Secretary of the military department concerned and which requires more than four academic years for completion of baccalaureate degree requirements, including elective requirements of the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps course, such term includes a fifth academic year or a combination of a part of a fifth academic year and summer sessions).
Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 88–647, title II, § 201(1), Oct. 13, 1964, 78 Stat. 1064; amended Pub. L. 98–94, title X, § 1003(a)(1), title XII, § 1268(11), Sept. 24, 1983, 97 Stat. 656, 706; Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title XII, § 1231(17), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1161; Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title V, § 553(b), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2526.)
- 1964Enacted · Pub. L. 88-647 · 78 Stat. 1064
- 1983Amended · Pub. L. 98-94 · 97 Stat. 656, 706
- 1987Amended · Pub. L. 100-180 · 101 Stat. 1161
- 1996Amended · Pub. L. 104-201 · 110 Stat. 2526
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 88-647 on 1964-10-13.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case