ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

10 U.S.C. § 223aBallistic missile defense programs: procurement

submitted 23 years ago by Pub. L. 108-136 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 234 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Secretary of Defense must include specific facts about each ballistic missile defense system element in its yearly budget materials to Congress, such as production capacity and fielding dates. The Secretary must also estimate procurement costs in the future-years defense program. The Missile Defense Agency's Director must describe how well each development phase counters foreign threats.

(a) Budget Justification Materials. Each year, when the Secretary of Defense submits budget materials to Congress for the Department of Defense (as part of the President's budget), the Secretary must give specific information for every ballistic missile defense system element that the Missile Defense Agency is planning to produce and field. For each element, the Secretary must state: (1) how much the planned production facilities can actually produce; (2) when that element could first be ready for use; and (3) when responsibility for buying that element is expected to move from the Missile Defense Agency's Director to the Secretary of a military department. (b) Future-Years Defense Program. Every year, the Secretary of Defense must include, in the future-years defense program sent to Congress under section 221, an estimate of how much money is needed to procure each ballistic missile defense system element, plus an explanation of the reasoning behind that estimate. (c) Performance Criteria. The Director of the Missile Defense Agency must include, in the performance criteria set for each planned phase of developing the missile defense system and its parts, a description of how effective that phase is meant to be against the capabilities of foreign adversaries.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Budget Justification Materials.—

In the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Defense budget for any fiscal year (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31), the Secretary of Defense shall specify, for each ballistic missile defense system element for which the Missile Defense Agency is engaged in planning for production and initial fielding, the following information:

(1)

The production rate capabilities of the production facilities planned to be used for production of that element.

(2)

The potential date of availability of that element for initial fielding.

(3)

The estimated date on which the administration of the acquisition of that element is to be transferred from the Director of the Missile Defense Agency to the Secretary of a military department.

(b)Future-Years Defense Program.—

The Secretary of Defense shall include in the future-years defense program submitted to Congress each year under section 221 of this title an estimate of the amount necessary for procurement for each ballistic missile defense system element, together with a discussion of the underlying factors and reasoning justifying the estimate.

(c)Performance Criteria.—

The Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall include in the performance criteria prescribed for planned development phases of the ballistic missile defense system and its elements a description of the intended effectiveness of each such phase against foreign adversary capabilities.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title II, § 223(a)(1), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1420; amended Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, § 1060(a)(1), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3502.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2003Enacted · Pub. L. 108-136 · 117 Stat. 1420
  • 2014Amended · Pub. L. 113-291 · 128 Stat. 3502

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 108-136 on 2003-11-24.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case