ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

10 U.S.C. § 2458Inventory management policies

submitted 36 years ago by Pub. L. 101-510 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 163 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A translation hasn’t been published for this section yet. The official text below is complete and authoritative.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Policy Required.—

The Secretary of Defense shall issue a single, uniform policy on the management of inventory items of the Department of Defense. Such policy shall—

(1)

establish maximum levels for inventory items sufficient to achieve and maintain only those levels for inventory items necessary for the national defense;

(2)

provide guidance to item managers and other appropriate officials on how effectively to eliminate wasteful practices in the acquisition and management of inventory items; and

(3)

set forth a uniform system for the valuation of inventory items by the military departments and Defense Agencies.

(b)Personnel Evaluations.—

The Secretary of Defense shall establish procedures to ensure that, with regard to item managers and other personnel responsible for the acquisition and management of inventory items of the Department of Defense, personnel appraisal systems for such personnel give appropriate consideration to efforts made by such personnel to eliminate wasteful practices and achieve cost savings in the acquisition and management of inventory items.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title III, § 323(a)(1), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1530; amended Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title III, § 347(a), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1347.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1990Enacted · Pub. L. 101-510 · 104 Stat. 1530
  • 1991Amended · Pub. L. 102-190 · 105 Stat. 1347

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 101-510 on 1990-11-05.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case