10 U.S.C. § 2631a — Contingency planning: sealift and related intermodal transportation requirements
submitted 33 years ago by Pub. L. 103-160 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 104 words · no verdicts yet
This section sets rules about contingency planning: sealift and related intermodal transportation requirements. It states the duties, permissions, limits, or procedures described in the section.
(a) Consideration of Private Capabilities .— The Secretary of Defense must ensure that all studies and reports of the Department of Defense, and all actions taken in the Department of Defense, concerning sealift and related intermodal transportation requirements take into consideration the full range of the transportation and distribution capabilities that are available from operators of privately owned United States flag merchant vessels.
(b) Private Capacities Presentations .— The Secretary must afford each operator of a vessel referred to in subsection (a), not less often than annually, an opportunity to present to the Department of Defense information on its port-to-port and intermodal transportation capacities.
The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that all studies and reports of the Department of Defense, and all actions taken in the Department of Defense, concerning sealift and related intermodal transportation requirements take into consideration the full range of the transportation and distribution capabilities that are available from operators of privately owned United States flag merchant vessels.
The Secretary shall afford each operator of a vessel referred to in subsection (a), not less often than annually, an opportunity to present to the Department of Defense information on its port-to-port and intermodal transportation capacities.
Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title XI, § 1173(a), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1767.)
- 1993Enacted · Pub. L. 103-160 · 107 Stat. 1767
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 103-160 on 1993-11-30.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case