ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

10 U.S.C. § 3102 — Objectives of the defense acquisition system

submitted 11 years ago by Pub. L. 114-92 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 304 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Secretary of Defense must ensure that the defense acquisition system quickly gives the armed forces the capabilities needed for effective operations, changing threats, and continued United States military advantage. The Secretary must issue guidance that centers end users and requires specified leadership, staffing, resource, engineering, innovation, and training practices.

(a) In general. The Secretary of Defense must ensure that the defense acquisition system quickly provides the armed forces the capabilities needed to operate effectively, address changing threats, and sustain the United States military advantage as cost-effectively as practicable. (b) Guidance. The Secretary must issue guidance to carry out subsection (a). The guidance must prioritize end users and be validated through direct engagement, experimentation, and iteration. It must require: (1) every acquisition-system activity to help deliver capabilities quickly, improve the armed forces’ operational readiness, and enable Defense Department missions; (2) a leadership culture and organizational structure that empowers acquisition-system managers and encourages suitable delegation, collaboration, and mission-focused risk-taking; (3) enough acquisition-workforce members, properly trained and assigned; (4) resource decisions that prioritize best value and balance life-cycle cost, schedule, performance, and quantity through continuing tradeoff analysis informed by prototypes and direct end-user feedback; (5) adoption and integration of advanced digital engineering, model-based engineering, and simulation environments for rapid iterative design and technology insertion that maximize mission results; (6) active pursuit of innovative solutions, including acquiring and integrating commercial products and services, to improve effectiveness and responsiveness to emerging threats; and (7) workforce training and development that gives equal weight to functional and technical skills and to cross-functional integration, critical thinking, and innovative approaches that best solve operational problems.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)In General.—

The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the defense acquisition system expeditiously provides the armed forces with the capabilities necessary to operate effectively, to address evolving threats, and to sustain the military advantage of the United States in the most cost-effective manner practicable.

(b)Guidance.—

The Secretary of Defense shall issue guidance to carry out subsection (a) and shall ensure that the defense acquisition system prioritizes the needs of end users and is validated by direct engagement, experimentation, and iteration. Such guidance shall require the following:

(1)

All activities of the defense acquisition system contribute to the expeditious delivery of capabilities to enhance the operational readiness of the armed forces and enable the missions of the Department of Defense.

(2)

A leadership culture and organizational structure that empowers individuals in the management of the defense acquisition system and encourages appropriate delegation authority, collaboration, and mission-focused risk-taking.

(3)

Sufficient numbers of members of the acquisition workforce to support the defense acquisition system, and that such members are properly trained and assigned.

(4)

Resource decisions for the defense acquisition system to prioritize best value and seek to balance life-cycle costs, schedule, performance, and quantity through continuous trade-off analysis informed by prototyping and direct feedback from end users.

(5)

Adoption and integration in the defense acquisition system of advanced approaches in digital engineering, model-based engineering, and simulation environments to enable rapid, iterative designs and technology insertion to maximize mission outcomes.

(6)

Active pursuit of innovative solutions to enhance effectiveness of the armed forces and responsiveness to emerging threats, including the acquisition and integration of commercial products and commercial services.

(7)

Approaches to workforce training and development that equally balance emphasis on functional and technical skills with skills in cross-functional integration, critical thinking, and innovative approaches that best deliver solutions to operational problems.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title VIII, § 802(a)(1), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 878, § 2546a; renumbered § 3102 and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1808(a)(2), (3)(A), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4159; Pub. L. 119–60, div. A, title XVIII, § 1801(a)(1), Dec. 18, 2025, 139 Stat. 1221.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2015Enacted · Pub. L. 114-92 · 129 Stat. 878
  • 2021Amended · Pub. L. 116-283 · 134 Stat. 4159
  • 2025Amended · Pub. L. 119-60 · 139 Stat. 1221

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 114-92 on 2015-11-25.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case