ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

10 U.S.C. § 4204 — Milestone decision authority

submitted 5 years ago by Pub. L. 116-283 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 547 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

For a major defense acquisition program reaching Milestone A after October 1, 2016, the service acquisition executive normally makes milestone decisions. The Secretary of Defense may assign another official in listed circumstances, and the section sets rules for returning authority and certifying program risks and funding.

(a) Service Acquisition Executive. For a major defense acquisition program that reaches Milestone A after October 1, 2016, the milestone decision authority is the service acquisition executive of the military department managing the program, unless the Secretary of Defense designates another official under subsection (b).

(b) Designation of Alternate Milestone Decision Authority. The Secretary of Defense may designate another milestone decision authority for a program if:

(1) subject to subsection (f), the Secretary decides the program addresses a joint requirement;

(2) the Secretary decides a Defense Agency can manage the program best;

(3) the program’s unit cost has increased by more than the significant-cost threshold or critical-cost threshold under 10 U.S.C. §§ 4371–4375;

(4) the program is critical to a major interagency requirement or technology-development effort, or has substantial involvement by international partners; or

(5) the Secretary decides an alternate official would best help the program achieve its desired cost, schedule, and performance results.

(c) Return to the service acquisition executive

(1) After designating an alternate under subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may return milestone decision authority to the service acquisition executive if the Secretary of the relevant military department asks. The Secretary of Defense must decide the request within 180 days after receiving it.

(2) If the Secretary of Defense denies the request, the Secretary must report to the congressional defense committees why the Secretary decided that an alternate official would best help achieve the program’s desired cost, schedule, and performance results. Authority may not be returned after the program’s unit cost has exceeded the significant-cost or critical-cost threshold under 10 U.S.C. §§ 4371–4375, except in exceptional circumstances.

(d) Certifications about program requirements and funding. For each major defense acquisition program, the Secretary of the relevant military department and the Chief of the relevant armed force must, in each Selected Acquisition Report required by 10 U.S.C. § 4351:

(1) certify that program requirements are stable and funding is sufficient to meet the program’s cost, schedule, and performance objectives; and

(2) identify and report to the congressional defense committees any increased program risk since the previous report.

(e) Documentation and oversight. The Secretary of Defense must review the oversight process for major defense acquisition programs and must:

(1) keep outside documentation requirements to an absolute minimum for programs where the managing military department’s service acquisition executive is the milestone decision authority; and

(2) ensure that policies, procedures, and activities for oversight outside the military departments are carried out in a way that does not unnecessarily raise program costs or obstruct program schedules.

(f) This section refers to subsection (f), but the supplied text contains no subsection (f).

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Service Acquisition Executive.—

The milestone decision authority for a major defense acquisition program reaching Milestone A after October 1, 2016, shall be the service acquisition executive of the military department that is managing the program, unless the Secretary of Defense designates, under subsection (b), another official to serve as the milestone decision authority.

(b)Designation of Alternate Milestone Decision Authority.—

The Secretary of Defense may designate an alternate milestone decision authority for a program with respect to which any of the following applies:

(1)

Subject to subsection (f), the Secretary determines that the program is addressing a joint requirement.

(2)

The Secretary determines that the program is best managed by a Defense Agency.

(3)

The program has incurred a unit cost increase greater than the significant cost threshold or critical cost threshold under sections 4371 through 4375 of this title.

(4)

The program is critical to a major interagency requirement or technology development effort, or has significant international partner involvement.

(5)

The Secretary determines that an alternate official serving as the milestone decision authority will best provide for the program to achieve desired cost, schedule, and performance outcomes.

(c)Reversion to Service Acquisition Executive.—
(1)

After designating an alternate milestone decision authority under subsection (b) for a program, the Secretary of Defense may revert the position of milestone decision authority for the program back to the service acquisition executive upon request of the Secretary of the military department concerned. A decision on the request shall be made within 180 days after receipt of the request from the Secretary of the military department concerned.

(2)

If the Secretary of Defense denies the request for reversion of the milestone decision authority back to the service acquisition executive, the Secretary shall report to the congressional defense committees on the basis of the Secretary’s decision that an alternate official serving as milestone decision authority will best provide for the program to achieve desired cost, schedule, and performance outcomes. No such reversion is authorized after a program has incurred a unit cost increase greater than the significant cost threshold or critical cost threshold under sections 4371 through 4375 of this title, except in exceptional circumstances.

(d)Certifications relating to program requirements and funding.—

For each major defense acquisition program, the Secretary of the military department concerned and the Chief of the armed force concerned shall, in each Selected Acquisition Report required under section 4351 of this title—

(1)

certify that program requirements are stable and funding is adequate to meet cost, schedule, and performance objectives for the program; and

(2)

identify and report to the congressional defense committees on any increased risk to the program since the last report.

(e)Documentation and Oversight.—

The Secretary of Defense shall review the acquisition oversight process for major defense acquisition programs and shall—

(1)

limit outside requirements for documentation to an absolute minimum on those programs where the service acquisition executive of the military department that is managing the program is the milestone decision authority; and

(2)

ensure that any policies, procedures, and activities related to oversight efforts conducted outside of the military departments with regard to major defense acquisition programs shall be implemented in a manner that does not unnecessarily increase program costs or impede program schedules.

Source credit: (Added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1846(b), (f)(1)–(7), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4248, 4250, 4251; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, § 1701(b)(15)(A), (o)(6)(B)(i), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2134, 2147; Pub. L. 118–159, div. A, title VIII, § 811(c), Dec. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 1979.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2021Enacted · Pub. L. 116-283 · 134 Stat. 4248, 4250, 4251
  • 2021Amended · Pub. L. 117-81 · 135 Stat. 2134, 2147
  • 2024Amended · Pub. L. 118-159 · 138 Stat. 1979

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 116-283 on 2021-01-01.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case